So far in the 21st century nearly a third of a billion children have been sexually abused, most of them multiple times, some thousands of times. 6 out of 7 are girls. Anything you can do to get this message to as many people as possible will help save abused children all over the world, and maybe even some of the abusers. Please read "Save A Child from Sexual Abuse by 3:15 PM" under "First Time Visitor?" May God bless you and anoint this ministry.
Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!
3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Just as the world cautiously tiptoes into the edge of the sea of filth of social media, France's courts have decided children need more freedom to find ways to get themselves raped, abused, trafficked, and convinced they are of the opposite sex. Unbelievably stupid and irresponsible!
France's top court has struck down the country's under-15 social media ban as unconstitutional on freedom of expression and privacy grounds. The court ruled that a blanket ban was a disproportionate limit on expression and that it forces everyone, including adults, to verify their age, thereby violating privacy without legislated safeguards. These are exactly the concerns I raised in my post arguing that Canada's social media ban is unconstitutional.
https://reuters.com/world/frances-top-court-rules-social-media-ban-curtails-freedom-expression-2026-08-14/
Spectacular jump in reported rapes in the UK in the 2020s
Diana Alastair
appholives83
Click to Subscribe to sappholives83
In 2000, less than 8k rapes were reported in the UK. Last year, there were 75,000. Multiculturalism in action, everyone.
Photo: Greater Manchester Police, Hullian111, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
The UK must be approaching the world's highest rape rates, if they haven't already blown them away.
4:07 AM · Aug 14, 2026 11.3K Views
According to Grok:
Recorded rape offences in England and Wales rose from around 8,500 in 2000 to roughly 71,000-75,000 by 2024/25, confirming the post's core numerical claim.
According to my calculations, that's almost a 9,000% increase. That's astonishing! How is it that there is no Royal Commission looking into this?
If anyone had queried Mohammad Hassan’s being hired as a trainee for any valid reason, he or she would have been called “Islamophobic.” The high incidence of Muslims raping girls and women in Britain does not, of course, warrant suspecting every Muslim, but it does warrant questions about the high rates of rape among this demographic, and calls for the prudent exercise of caution for the sake of the wellbeing of innocent people. But even the mention of such caution earns one the label of “racist” or “Islamophobe.” In Britain, Muslims raping women is more acceptable than asking questions that may offend Muslims; for instance, questions relating to what Islam teaches. In Islam, women are inferiors, and fair game to be assaulted if not fully covered, while infidel women are free to be taken. See more HERE.
It’s no coincidence that sex assaults by Muslim men in the UK are so high, given the migrant invasion from Africa and the Middle East, despite the fact that Mohammad Hassan was not himself an illegal migrant. He is described as “being of Asian-Pakistani ethnicity.” The Muslim rape gangs were overwhelmingly described as “Asian,” with the term “Asian” used instead of “Pakistani” in order to obscure the identity of the perpetrators and not offend Muslims. It was somehow deemed acceptable to offend Asians, who were not involved in this wave of assaults.
Trainee Police Officer Mohammad Hassan Charged with Rape and Kidnap After Highway Chase Arrest
by Oliver JJ Lane, Breitbart, August 22, 2026:Trainee police officer Mohammad Hassan has been suspended by Greater Manchester Police over being charged in relation to the alleged kidnap and rape of a woman in her 20s while he was off duty over the weekend.
Greater Manchester Police said they have brought charges against a student officer in relation to the “rape and kidnap of a woman in Manchester while off-duty over the weekend”. The 23-year-old trainee, Mohammad Hassan, who was described by the force as being “of Asian-Pakistani ethnicity” has been suspended from the police.
Being Pakistani, would he even know that raping a woman was against the law? It's certainly not against Sharia. She was in his car, ie., in his right hand.
The BBC reports police responded to an emergency 999 call on Saturday night, in which a woman could be heard in distress inside a moving vehicle, Hassan was subsequently arrested in West Yorkshire after a police pursuit on the M62 motorway.
A woman in her 20s was assisted by officers at the scene. The Daily Telegraph states the suspect was allegedly driving his personal vehicle during the pursuit, not a police car…
There is, of course, domestic violence in all cultures. So to post this is just “Islamophobic,” right? Wrong: there is domestic violence in all cultures, but only in one does it have divine sanction. Islam doesn’t teach that man may kill his wife, but once you’ve allowed him to beat her, accidents will happen.
The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”:“Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Another possibility is that he was pressuring her to convert to Islam and she refused. Muslim women are forbidden to marry Hindu men. The Qur’an says: “Do not marry idolatresses until they believe, for indeed, a believing slave woman is better than an idolatress, even though she pleases you. And do not give your daughters in marriage to idolaters until they believe, for indeed, a believing slave is better than an idolater, even though he pleases you. These people invite you to the fire, and Allah invites you to the garden, and to forgiveness by his grace, and explains his signs to mankind so that perhaps they will remember.” (Qur’an 2:221)
Abdul Ghafoori, Toronto Police
Toronto man accused of killing intimate partner returns to Canada to face murder charge
by Spiro Papuckoski, Toronto Sun, August 8, 2026 (thanks to Ray):
A Toronto man who vanished after the body of his intimate partner was found inside a residence has been arrested and charged with her murder after he returned to Canada more than seven months on the run….
On Dec. 22, police identified the victim as 30-year-old Himanshi Khurana of Toronto….
“We are deeply saddened and shocked by the murder of Ms. Himanshi Khurana, a young Indian national, in Toronto,” India’s Toronto-based Consulate General wrote in a statement on social media on Dec. 23….
On Saturday, police announced the suspect returned to Canada and was located and arrested Friday after members of the Fugitive Squad and Homicide and Missing Persons Unit worked with national and international policing partners to facilitate the accused’s return to Canada.
Abdul Ghafoori, 32, has been charged with first-degree murder…
Alberta music star Paul Brandt has a message for Canada: 'We're dropping the ball'
'The cowboy hat gets me into a lot of rooms,' says the artist. He's using that leverage to fight for tougher justice for child predators.
CALGARY — In his signature Smithbilt hat, buckle and boots, Alberta country and western music star Paul Brandt strolls into a boardroom at Calgary International Airport, $12,000 guitar in tow.
Article content
While he certainly looks the part of a multi-platinum recording artist, he’s not here to talk about his latest album, upcoming tour or anything to do with his music.
The one thing on his mind is how, he says, Canada is failing its most vulnerable with lax enforcement against child sexual abuse and exploitation.
Article content
Advertisement 1
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision last fall to strike down mandatory one-year sentences for accessing child sexual abuse material, and the lack of a swift response from the federal government, has been consuming him.
Article content
Article content
He sees the decision as an affront to everything Canada should stand for.
Article content
“If there’s ever a time for us to come together as Canadians, it’s by standing up for protecting kids. And, right now, we’re dropping the ball,” says Brandt, frustration slipping through his familiar baritone voice.
Article content
Brandt says the decision, coupled with a general lack of consequences for high-risk sex offenders, sends a signal to child sexual predators around the world that Canada is open for business.
Article content
“Child sexual abuse materials are the marketing department of human trafficking,” says Brandt. “So, if you wanted to advertise to pedophiles that there’s a great place where you can go, Canada’s looking pretty good right now.”
Article content
Canada’s lax enforcement and general lack of consequences for high-risk sex offenders sends a signal to child predators around the world, says country and western star Paul Brandt.Photo by Christina Ryan/National Post
Article content
He’s not embellishing. In July, Quebec’s top appeals court struck down mandatory one-year sentences for distributing child sexual abuse material, citing the Supreme Court decision as precedent.
Brandt, the most awarded male Canadian country artist of all time, and a 2017 inductee into the Canadian Country Music Hall of Fame, isn’t your typical celebrity on a soapbox. He’s spent two decades advocating against human trafficking, logging countless hours with survivors, law enforcement officials and experts on the issue.
Article content
If you wanted to advertise to pedophiles that there’s a great place where you can go, Canada’s looking pretty good right now
Paul Brandt
Article content
It’s a passion that has grown, over time, into a busy second job. Brandt was appointed in 2020 to lead Alberta’s first human trafficking task force and now serves as co-chair of the Alberta Centre to End Trafficking in Persons. He balances these duties with running his own anti-trafficking charity, Not In My City, alongside his wife Liz.
Article content
And it’s a cause that has also led to some unwelcome attention, including his first experience, earlier this year, with being cancelled.
Article content
“Independence in my veins”
Article content
It was a Jan. 24 social media post that thrust Brandt into the middle of an emotional debate over Alberta’s future in Canada.
The post showed Brandt walking across a crosswalk with lyrics from his 2005 single Alberta Bound in the foreground. A highlighted line in the middle of the frame reads, “Yeah, I’ve got independence in my veins.”
Article content
The song had previously been tied to the early 2022 anti-COVID measures protests at the Coutts-Sweet Grass border crossing in southern Alberta. One line in the song references crossing the border at the “Sweet Grass sign”.
Article content
But Brandt’s January social media post, coming amidst a drive for an independence referendum, fuelled speculation that he was sending a coded message of support to the separatist side.
Article content
Brandt dodged questions about the post’s subtext but said in a follow-up post that he wished “that people cared as much about the fight against child exploitation in (Canada) as they do about a song lyric that was written in 2004.”
Article content
Two weeks later, Brandt was conspicuously removed as a speaker at an Edmonton teachers’ convention. He says he was originally invited to the Alberta Teachers’ Association-sponsored event to discuss a human trafficking awareness and prevention course he runs through Not In My City.
Organizers declined to say why Brandt was taken off the speakers’ list, but the timing of the move drew suspicion — and condemnation.
Article content
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who four months earlier had used the notwithstanding clause to put down a teachers’ strike led by the union, was quick to call out the snub.
Article content
Smith said in a social media post that she was “immensely disappointed” with Brandt’s dis-inviting, accusing the union of politicizing his non-partisan work of “standing up for the victims of sex trafficking.”
Article content
Brandt says the blowback to the social media post came as a “total surprise” to him. Now, having had months to reflect on the blowup, he admits that Alberta separatism is a much “hotter discussion point” than he’d understood at the time.
Article content
Alberta’s Paul Brandt says the controversy over his ‘Independence in my veins’ post at the beginning of 2026 came as a total surprise to him. ‘I love this country. I love it deeply.’
Article content
Edmonton talk show host Ryan Jespersen, who interviewed Brandt at the height of the controversy, says that he was visibly uneasy with the media scrutiny.
Article content
“I asked him, when he came by the studio, if he was uncomfortable to see his name in the headlines like this, and he sort of chuckled and laughed and said any attention is good attention,” recalls Jespersen. “But it sort of felt like he didn’t really believe what he said at that time. Like it clearly did make him uncomfortable.”
Article content
Jespersen said that being swept up in a debate over Alberta’s future in Canada clashed with Brandt’s longstanding “nice guy” image.
Article content
“For everything (Brandt’s) been, or people see him as, he’s never been seen as, like, a jerk, or someone who uses his platform to divide people. So, I think it came as a shock for him to be at the heart of such a polarized and partisan thing,” said Jespersen.
Article content
On the matter of national unity, Brandt says that his activism is ultimately an expression of his Canadian patriotism.
Article content
“You know, I love this country. I love it deeply. And I want to see it unite in a way that is impacting and protecting children in a way that they need to be protected,” says Brandt.
Article content
Brandt takes on Ottawa
Article content
Brandt got far less media coverage last November, when he met with federal Justice Minister Sean Fraser to voice his concerns about what he saw as weak deterrence and insufficient criminal penalties for sexual predators who target children.
Article content
The 45-minute virtual meeting took place just days after the Supreme Court issued a controversial 5-4 decision striking down mandatory minimum one-year prison terms for accessing child sexual abuse material.
In her majority opinion, Justice Mary Moreau relied on a hypothetical scenario: an 18-year-old being forwarded a single “sext” originally sent by his friend’s 17-year-old girlfriend. This example overlooked the far more serious facts of the two actual cases before the Court, both involving abuses of children under the age of 10.
Article content
Brandt hoped to persuade Fraser to use the notwithstanding clause to reinstate the mandatory sentences but says the justice minister was unreceptive to the idea. In fact, he recalls not seeing eye-to-eye with Fraser at all during the call.
Article content
it came as a shock for him to be at the heart of such a polarized and partisan thing
Ryan Jespersen
Article content
“There’s nothing that (Fraser) said to me where I went ‘yea, that makes sense,’” says Brandt. “I think that we are completely opposed on the direction we need to be taking.”
Article content
Brandt still believes that the notwithstanding clause, which allows legislatures to temporarily override parts of the Charter for up to five years, should have been used right away to protect children while new legislation was being drafted.
Article content
The federal government has never used the notwithstanding clause, although several provinces have.
Article content
Advertisement 5
A senior Liberal source, who did not want to be named, said that it would look awkward for Fraser to invoke the notwithstanding clause to restore penalties for child sexual abuse material while leading a court challenge of Quebec’s use of the clause in its secularism law.
Article content
The Liberal government’s Bill C-16, which partially restores the one-year minimums while giving individual judges a “safety valve” to hand down lesser sentences, was passed into law in mid-June.
Article content
However, it could be months or longer before the new law is applied to sentencing, as courts will need to be trained on how to use it.
Article content
Justice Canada spokesperson Katelyn Moores said that the revived mandatory minimum penalties will apply to all offences committed after August 18, but didn’t give an estimate of when it would be used in sentencing.
Article content
Peter Copeland, acting director of domestic policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said it’s hard to know how the new law will ultimately impact sentencing.
Article content
“It could be that there are very few instances where (the safety valve) is applied or it could be relied upon often to lower sentences,” said Copeland.
Article content
Advertisement 6
Article content
“There is reason to think that it may be the latter, as courts have shown themselves willing to use race, sex, migration status and other factors to lessen sentencing outcomes,” he added.
Which is all part of Canada's pathetic justice system. They bend over backwards to go easy on criminals while completely ignoring the suffering of victims and potential victims.
He choked back tears partway through his opening statement when referencing the case of Skye Atoa, an accused Lethbridge, Alta., child sex trafficker who was caught breaking the terms of his release less than 30 minutes after making bail in mid-January.
Article content
Atoa, then 50, was supposed to report to a halfway house, but police found him in the perfume aisle of a nearby store, in close proximity to a young female shopper.
Article content
Atoa had been originally charged with drugging, sexually assaulting and trafficking a 14-year-old girl and confining two other girls — aged 15 and 16 — in his apartment.
Article content
He was also charged in connection with a separate incident where a 24-year-old vulnerable female was sexually assaulted at his residence.
Brandt told the Senate committee that fixing Canada’s broken bail system is necessary for the “health and safety of Canadian society as a whole.”
Article content
He recommended that Parliament strengthen the bill by expanding the onus on those seeking bail to demonstrate they aren’t a threat to children and codifying all forms of human trafficking and child sexual exploitation as violent crimes for the purpose of sentencing.
Article content
His recommendations didn’t make it into the final draft of Bill C-14, also passed in mid-June.
Article content
With both Liberal crime bills now in the books, Brandt says he’s baffled that politicians and courts struggle to grasp what most Canadians understand intuitively. “If there was ever an opportunity to unify Canada, it’s by abandoning the half-measure approach these bills represent. Listening to victims, survivors and the public, and demanding restorative accountability is key.”
Article content
Country and western artist Paul Brandt at the Calgary Airport in May with a sign for his anti-human trafficking organization Not In My City in the background.Photo by Christina Ryan/National Post
Article content
For proof the current approach isn’t working, Brandt points to the 204 per cent increase in police-reported human trafficking incidents over the past decade. Online child sexual exploitation has gone up by 347 per cent over the same period.
Article content
Advertisement 7
Article content
Line in the Cambodian sand
Article content
It was a visit to Cambodia in late 2004 that first opened Brandt’s eyes to the brutal realities of human trafficking and organized child sexual exploitation.
Article content
He and wife Liz had been invited to take a tour of the Southeast Asian country by a humanitarian organization. What they saw there changed both of their lives forever.
Article content
Brandt vividly remembers an encounter he had with a five-year-old girl who’d been sold into sexual slavery.
Article content
“She was being sold six to eight times a night to adult men,” recalls Brandt. “And when I met her, (human trafficking) went from this issue making a dent in my life to there now being a sense of personal responsibility.”
Article content
Liz, who’d been sexually assaulted at the age of seven, suffered a breakdown and episode of PTSD while in Cambodia. She needed to be medicated to fly back to North America.
Article content
Upon returning home, Brandt set out to educate himself about the prevalence of sex trafficking and child exploitation in Canada, and how to support survivors and potential victims.
Article content
“The cowboy hat gets me into a lot of rooms, so I started meeting politicians, thought leaders and changemakers in this space,” Brandt says.
Article content
Advertisement 8
Article content
But seeing how normalized child sexual exploitation was in Cambodia gave Brandt “a bit of a premonition” of the direction things go when people turn a blind eye to such heinous activities.
Article content
He and Liz both vowed to speak up if they ever saw Canada sliding down the same path.
Article content
“Our line, I think, was drawn in the Cambodian sand, when we saw a culture where routine child sexual abuse had become normalized almost to the point of invisibility,” said Brandt.
Article content
In an interview over the phone, Liz says that as a survivor of child sexual assault, she felt “personally insulted” when the Supreme Court struck down mandatory minimum penalties for accessing child sexual abuse materials.
Article content
“Decades after I was assaulted, I was still dealing with some of the after-effects of trauma. And for judges to think that a year is too harsh a penalty for the criminals who drive the demand for children to be victimized and revictimized? It’s just insulting.”
Article content
Please continue reading this lengthy article in the National Post at: