Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!

3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Give Thanks. There is more to this prayer here

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Showing posts with label bans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bans. Show all posts

Friday, 27 March 2026

Social media companies getting large fines for treatment of children and teens; UK House of Lords votes for kid's ban on social media again

 

Meta and Google fined for causing child addiction


The verdict comes after Facebook’s parent company was ordered to pay $375 million for profiting from exposing youngsters to online abuse

Published 26 Mar, 2026 15:45 | Updated 26 Mar, 2026 16:50

Meta and Google fined for causing child addiction











A jury in California found Alphabet’s Google and Meta liable for $6 million in damages on Wednesday in a landmark lawsuit in which the social media giants were accused of being legally responsible for the addictive design of their platforms.

Major US tech companies have faced increasing scrutiny over child and teen safety over the past decade, a debate that has now moved into courts and state legislatures. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, an organization that tracks state laws, at least 20 states enacted laws on social media usage and children in 2025.

A jury ordered Meta to pay $4.2 million and Google $1.8 million in a lawsuit by a 20-year-old woman identified as Kaley, who said she became addicted to YouTube and Instagram as a minor due to features – such as infinite scrolling – which encourage prolonged engagement. Of the total award, about $3 million is compensation to the plaintiff, while the remainder represents punitive damages.

Both tech giants said they disagree with the ruling, and announced plans to appeal. TikTok and Snap were also named as defendants in the case, but managed to settle before the trial began.

On Tuesday, a jury in New Mexico ordered Meta Platforms, which runs Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads, to pay $375 million for knowingly harming children’s mental health and concealing evidence of child sexual exploitation, saying its personalized algorithms could also aid pedophiles.

A separate social media addiction case brought by several states and school districts against major technology companies is expected to go to trial this summer in federal court in Oakland, California. Another state trial is scheduled to begin in July in Los Angeles and will involve Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat.

Globally, Meta Platforms faces growing regulatory pressure, having been labeled an “extremist organization” in Russia in 2022 and targeted by multiple European Union actions, including a €797 million ($940 million) antitrust fine and other copyright, data-protection and advertising cases across Europe.

Amid growing concerns over child safety online, countries including Australia, Denmark, France, Spain, Italy, Slovenia, the UK, Indonesia, and Malaysia are restricting or considering limits on social media access for children and teens.

=====================================================================================



Britain's House of Lords votes for under-16s social media ban again

   
Britain's House of Lords voted Thursday to try to force through a social media ban for children only two weeks after lawmakers in the lower house overturned a previous attempt. Photo by Pixelkult/Pixabay
Britain's House of Lords voted Thursday to try to force through a social media ban for children only two weeks after lawmakers in the lower house overturned a previous attempt. Photo by Pixelkult/Pixabay

March 26 (UPI) -- Britain's House of Lords revived an effort to ban children younger than 16 from using social media, only two weeks after the House of Commons voted to override a previous bid by the upper chamber of Parliament.

In a 266-141 vote early Thursday, peers backed former Conservative education minister Lord John Nash's amendment to the Labour government's Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill for a second time after MPs defeated it in favor of a 3-month public consultation and bounced the legislation back to the Lords.

"Delay has consequences," Nash said in a statement after the vote.

"Tonight the House of Lords sent for the second time an unambiguous message to the government: hollow promises and half-measures are not enough. That they voted in even greater numbers than before sends a very clear message to the government that they must act now to raise the age limit for access to harmful social media sites to 16," he added.

==================================================

Monday, 20 May 2024

When you take Social Media out of school, it puts the Social back into school > Amazing results for banning smartphones

 

This Is What Happened After Several Schools

Banned Cellphones

Researchers of a 73-page paper followed data from recent decades, mainly focusing on 2010 to 2018.

The Epoch Times, Health


5/6/2024
Updated:
5/14/2024


Banning cellphones in schools improved academics, reduced bullying, and reduced students’ need for counseling, a 73-page Norwegian paper has found.

Girls benefited the most from the policies.

“Banning smartphones significantly decreases the health care take-up for psychological symptoms and diseases among girls,” Sara Sofie Abrahamsson, a postdoctoral researcher and the paper’s sole author, wrote in the abstract. “Post-ban bullying among both genders decreases.

The paper followed data from recent decades, mainly focusing on 2010 to 2018.

The researcher observed no negative impact from introducing such a policy.

“The phones are an absolute distraction. Even if a kid has the phone in their pocket during class, if the phone is on vibrate every time it vibrates, which is constantly, their mind automatically shifts away from what the teacher is teaching to the phone,” Tom Kersting, a psychotherapist who was a school counselor for 25 years, told The Epoch Times in agreement with the report’s findings.

As a proponent of banning phones in schools, Mr. Kersting suspected that Norway would see improvements in students’ academics, mental health, and social and emotional skills.

Major Findings

There are no national guidelines on smartphone use in Norway. Instead, schools make their own decisions on whether to allow smartphones.

Therefore, Ms. Abrahamsson used a survey to collect data from Norwegian middle schools on smartphone use and whether and when they had introduced any smartphone regulations.

These data were then matched to a school’s data, including student grades set by teachers and external exams, student GPAs, student visits to psychologists and general practitioners, and measurements for bullying.

Ms. Abrahamsson’s four major findings were as follows:
  1. The number of psychological consultations was reduced by 60 percent in female students.
  2. The incidence of bullying for both girls and boys lowered.
  3. Girls made gains in GPA and externally graded mathematics tests.
  4. Girls were more likely to attend an academic high school track.

The first finding is far more important than we might realize. If Ms Abrahamsson continues her research, I'm sure that she will find there will be a drop in the number of girls inquiring about transgendering. Social media is a big factor in the astonishing growth in the number of girls wanting to experiment with being a boy.

The author found that the stricter the smartphone policy, the greater the improvement among female students. Stricter schools forbade students from bringing phones to school or required students to hand in their phones before the start of class.

Girls from low socioeconomic backgrounds showed the most improvement.

However, smartphone bans did not affect boys’ mental health and GPA.

“These findings are consistent with other research that has shown associations between smartphone use—specifically social media use and this type of outcome,” Kate Blocker, a social psychologist with a doctorate in experimental psychology and the director of research at Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development, told The Epoch Times.
However, she said it isn’t guaranteed that the Norwegian findings are generalizable to other Western countries.

Smartphone Bans in the United States

A 2024 survey by America’s National Parents Union found that only 32 percent of parents support schools banning students from using their phones, though 43 percent reported that their child’s school had such a policy.
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, during the 2019–2020 school year, more than 76 percent of schools prohibited the nonacademic use of cellphones or smartphones during school hours.

Several school districts have introduced more stringent phone policies that have received growing support from teachers, students, and parents alike.

Bill Wilson, superintendent of Brush School District in Colorado, who has a doctorate in education, introduced a change to the district’s cellphone policy in 2021.

While the district always had a policy prohibiting cellphone use during school hours, there were no consequences for violating this policy. So in 2021, a policy was implemented: Unexempted students caught using phones would have to get their parents to come to the school to remove the phone.

Mr. Wilson told The Epoch Times that when a phone-banning policy was first suggested, many parents came to hearings with the fear that schools wanted “to control their kid and take away their kid’s ability to contact them if something happened in the school day,“ implying that ”the schools are doing something inappropriate by not giving their kids their rights.”

The school policy was later amended so students could have their phones, but they had to be in their backpacks. Furthermore, students with medical conditions or certain obligations that required smartphone monitoring could check their phones in the school office.

Gradually, parents warmed up to such a policy.

“The more conversations we have, even with those who are vehemently opposed initially, the more they begin to realize that we’re on the same team,“ he said. ”We’re trying to help navigate what has become a very challenging situation successfully in the best interest of kids and the learning environment.”

Mr. Wilson said teachers and students were among the first groups to appreciate such a policy.

“[Students] were thankful to not have that distraction, and that pressure and that worry about whether somebody was going to make a comment about their clothes or take a picture of them or multiple pictures of them while they’re talking, and wait until they get a silly one and make a meme out of it,” Mr. Wilson said.

In schools that have implemented cellphone restrictions, teachers also have begun reporting that their students are more engaged in and out of class. Students have become more social and interact with each other, and disciplinary actions have been reduced.

With schools moving toward digitalized learning, Ms. Blocker cautioned that teachers and administrators should be critical when “evaluating the goals and outcomes of technology use in classrooms.”

She said that “the reality is, when technology isn’t introduced thoughtfully, it doesn’t always live up to the hype. Not every new tool will revolutionize how we teach and learn, especially if there isn’t careful integration that is aligned with a clear pedagogical purpose.”

Mr. Wilson sees smartphone bans at schools across the United States gradually becoming the norm.

In 2023, Florida became the first state to enact a statewide ban on phones and social media during class time.

The state’s Orange County also enacted a phone ban during school hours, with some teachers reporting a remarkable change in student behavior and classroom engagement.

Ohio, Oklahoma, Vermont, and Kansas have since passed bills to control phone use in schools. Several school districts, including those in Maryland, California, Virginia, and Connecticut, have also implemented phone bans.

“It’s happening more, and I think it’s becoming more restrictive. From no use during the school day, and then everybody has their own slice on whether students can have them,” Mr. Wilson said.

================================================================


Friday, 4 February 2022

Approaching Sodom > Virtual gang-rape in Meta's VR platform; So. Dakota bans Xgender athletes from Women's sports; Lia's teammates divided

..

Virtual ‘gang rape’ results in new Meta feature

or

New Meta feature results in virtual ‘gang rape’


Social network rolls out personal force field for VR avatars blocking most touch


© Global Look Press / Felix Schlikis


Meta, formerly Facebook, has added a “personal boundary” system to its Horizon virtual reality platform in response to concerns over virtual harassment. The feature, which creates an invisible and impenetrable force field with an “almost four-foot” radius around individual avatars, will be turned on by default in both the Horizon Worlds creation platform and the Horizon Venues live event host, Meta revealed in a blog post on Friday.

While users can apparently still stretch their arms past the new no-go zone in order to deliver high-fives, fist bumps, and other less intimate forms of greeting, a Meta spokesperson revealed users would not have the option of disabling their personal boundaries even if they wanted to be “groped” or otherwise touched. Users who try to touch others will find their movement blocked, and the would-be recipient of the touch will feel nothing.

According to the blog post, the Metaverse’s grope-proof pods are meant to establish standards for how people interact across all VR platforms. While Meta left the possibility open of eventually being able to customize the size of the no-go zones’ radius, removing touch from the equation may have unexpected negative results for Meta’s popularity. 

Given that much of the internet’s evolution has been driven by the porn industry, eliminating physical intimacy from Meta’s version of virtual reality is likely to limit its appeal to certain demographics – no small concern given the company’s recent stock market tribulations.

Horizon Worlds beta tester Nina Jane Patel claimed she was virtually “groped” – an accusation she later leveled up to “gang raped” – after plugging in to the virtual reality platform in November. Within just a minute of signing in, she wrote on her blog at the time, she was set upon by “3 to 4 male avatars, with male voices” who “essentially, but virtually gang raped my avatar and took photos.” She is the only beta tester to go public with such allegations, and has parlayed her notoriety into what she describes as a child-friendly Metaverse equipped with parental controls, called Kabuni.

As I have claimed many times on this blog, whenever a new social media platform is invented, paedophiles will be the first demographic to master it and will be there waiting for your children to come online. This is proof that my claims are accurate. Within a minute - 3 or 4 rapists assaulted her avatar, producing a new kind of pornography. 

Paedos will quickly find a way around an 'impenetrable force field' and introduce our children to another level of evil.

After investigating the incident, Meta determined that Patel hadn’t taken full advantage of existing isolation features, including a block button – which she admits, arguing it happened too fast for her to even think of “putting the safety barrier in place.” While the company suggested it would make the block button and other options “trivially easy and findable,” this was apparently not sufficient for harassment-proofing the Metaverse. Previous iterations of VR social media platforms have included personal space bubbles as an option that can be turned on and off, but Meta opted not to go that route.

=====================================================================================



South Dakota bans transgender women from competing

on female sports teams 

By MATT MCNULTY FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 12:40 EST, 4 February 2022 |

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem signed a bill on Thursday that will ban transgender girls and college-age women from playing in women's school sports leagues, making South Dakota the tenth state to enact such a law.

Noem is the first governor to sign such a ban this year. The bill is set to take effect July 1, but still faces potential legal challenges along the way. 

Lawmakers used the Pennsylvania case of a 22-year-old transgender woman, Lia Thomas, who has had a dominant year swimming for the women's University of Pennsylvania team, as proof that trans athletes possess an unfair advantage over their competition.

Thomas blew away the competition and shattered two national women's records at the Zippy International in Akron, Ohio in December; in the 1,650-yard freestyle, Anna Kalandadze, a UPenn teammate, finished second - 38 seconds behind her. 

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, center, signs a bill Thursday in Pierre, that will ban transgender women and girls from playing in school sports leagues that match their gender identity


Meanwhile, federal judges halted enforcement of similar laws in Idaho and West Virginia, while the Justice Department challenged bans in other states as violations of federal law.

The Republican governor touted the ban at a bill signing ceremony in the Capitol, telling reporters: 

'We will ensure that we have fairness and a level playing field for female athletes here in the state of South Dakota, at the K-12 level and at the university level.'

Opponents have decried the bill as bullying and say it sends a message that transgender people are not welcome in the state.

'At a time when young people are facing an unprecedented need for support, it is devastating to see politicians instead invent new ways to exclude them,' said Sam Ames, the director of advocacy at The Trevor Project, which advocates for transgender youth. 

Noem, pictured, is the first governor to sign such a ban this year,
making South Dakota the 10th state to enact such a law


Noem lobbied forcefully for the bill this year after shying away from signing a similar ban last year. 

She issued a 'style and form veto' in March 2021 that led to its demise and argued that it contained flawed language that put the state at risk of litigation and retribution from the NCAA. But the same month, she issued executive orders that restricted participation in female sports to allow those assigned female at birth. 

But Noem, who has positioned herself for a 2024 run for the White House, seized on the momentum this year of a cause taking hold among Republicans.

The NCAA did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the bill's passage or whether it would take action as a result. 

The college athletics organization last month adopted a sport-by-sport approach for transgender athletes, allowing each sport's national governing body to determine its policy on transgender participation. 

Last month, a South Dakota legislative committee approved a bill championed by Noem to ban transgender women and girls from participating in school sports leagues that match their gender identity. 

With the Republican governor's full-fledged lobbying, the bill received enthusiastic approval in the Republican-dominated Senate State Affairs committee, clearing a legislative hurdle that was a key roadblock to similar South Dakota bills in the past. 

It was the first bill the committee took up last year, as lawmakers fast-tracked it through the Statehouse.

Every Republican on the committee approved the bill, despite warnings from opponents that it alienates and bullies transgender students, and exposes public schools to legal action for a political cause that has not been an issue in South Dakota.

Proponents said it protects girls' sports from trans athletes who may be bigger, faster and stronger than their peers.  

The nine other states that have signed legislation banning transgender female athletes from participating in women's sports teams are Arkansas, Alabama, Texas, Idaho, Mississippi, Montana, West Virginia, and Tennessee. 

Other states including Kentucky, Connecticut, Michigan, Pennsylvania have had similar bills proposed, however they are not expected to advance. 

Bills in New Mexico and News Hampshire had previously failed before they could even be debated. 

Ten US states with laws banning transgender girls, college-age women from playing in women's school sports leagues:


1. Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a law in April 2021 restricting transgender students from participating in K-12 sports.

2. Arkansas banned transgender athletes from joining female sports teams in March 2021, becoming one of the first few states to do so.

3. Texas passed Senate Bill 29 to enact a ban through state law

4. Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed the 'Fairness in Women's Sports Act' in March 2020, which has since been at the center of multiple lawsuits.

6. Mississippi banned transgender athletes from competing on girls' or women's sports teams in March. The ban will become enforced July 1.

7. Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte signed a bill to ban trans female athletes in May.

8. West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice signed a bill in April that restricts transgender athletes from competing in female sports in middle and high schools and colleges. 

8. South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem signed a similar bill on Thursday, set to take effect starting July 1.

9. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a law in May banning transgender athletes from participating in girls’ sports.




Teammates demand ban for dominant trans swimmer


The record breaker's colleagues support her transition

but not her participation in women's competition



Lia Thomas has sparked widespread debate. © Hunter Martin/Getty Images


Sixteen teammates of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas wrote a letter to the University of Pennsylvania asking the school not to take legal action against recent National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) policy changes while insisting Thomas has an "unfair advantage" in women's events.

The members of the UPenn team sent the letter to the college and Ivy League officials on Thursday, and stressed that though they support Thomas in her life decisions, she should not be allowed to continue her record-breaking run in events such as next month's NCAA championships.

"We fully support Lia Thomas in her decision to affirm her gender identity and to transition from a man to a woman. Lia has every right to live her life authentically," began the letter, which has been obtained by the Washington Post.

"However, we also recognize that when it comes to sports competition, that the biology of sex is a separate issue from someone’s gender identity.

From #462 as a male to #1 as a female


"Biologically, Lia holds an unfair advantage over [her] competition in the women’s category, as evidenced by her rankings that have bounced from #462 as a male to #1 as a female," the teammates claimed.

"If she were to be eligible to compete against us, she could now break Penn, Ivy, and NCAA Women’s Swimming records; feats she could never have done as a male athlete."

And records that no real woman could ever break.

Thomas previously campaigned for UPenn's men's team for three seasons prior to undergoing hormone replacement therapy.

On the other side of the pandemic, she broke records in two separate meets this season which caused controversy and sparked debate as per the fairness of transgender athlete participation in events for the sex they have transitioned to across college sports.

In reaction to this, the NCAA passed responsibility on to the individual national governing bodies of each sport to determine participation for transgender athletes and how testosterone levels are documented prior to the beginning of their respective seasons.

On Tuesday, USA Swimming announced it had changed its policy on transgender athletes policy with immediate effect. Moving forward, a three-person panel made up of independent medical experts is to determine whether a swimmer boasts a competitive advantage as a result of her previous physical development as a male, and testosterone in a swimmer’s blood should not exceed 5 nmol/L for a continuous period of at least 36 months.

In their letter, Thomas' sixteen teammates asked UPenn not to challenge this through legal action against USA Swimming, which could prevent Thomas from taking part in future events but perhaps not the NCAA Championships from March 16-19 as the new policy will be gradually phased in through three stages.

The girls remained anonymous in the letter, which was sent by 1984 Olympic swimming gold medalist and lawyer Nancy Hogshead-Makar, who is also the chief executive of women's sports advocacy organization Champion Women

In a telephone interview with the Washington Post, Hogshead-Makar said that the letter was sent on their behalf to evade retaliation as they have been told "we would be removed from the team or that we would never get a job offer" for speaking out against Thomas swimming in women’s competitions.

Additionally, Hogshead-Makar thinks the NCAA was wise to update the rules.

"It turns out that it was only based on a hypothesis and that it was just not true," she said of previous policy. "So now there’s been a lot more science on it, more research on it, and it shows that in many cases that ... you cannot roll back [male puberty]; you can’t take any medication to overcome what male puberty gives you.

"When it became clear, all this new science was coming through, transgender advocates were saying: ‘Oh, but it’s never going to happen. Nobody’s ever going to come and break women’s records. ... You’re not going to see that at the Olympics or at nationals.’ And then Lia came along. It just shows the need to update the NCAA rule," Hogshead-Makar added.

A UPenn parent claimed to the Washington Post that only "two or three" girls, one of whom is her daughter, were behind the letter but added that a colleague "who is a senior" approached a UPenn coach about Thomas' participation and was more or less told to "get over it".

"In a subsequent conversation with my daughter, she expressed how she’s really unhappy with the situation, she thinks it’s wrong, and so on, but she thinks that since we’re at this point of the season already, she thinks at this point Lia should just be able to finish out the season. That’s another perspective," the parent explained.

Thomas found support from some teammates, though, who sent a statement out after an unidentified UPenn swimmer said to Fox News that Thomas has a "monumental" advantage over the rest of them.  

"We want to express our full support for Lia in her transition," the swimmers said, as reported by ESPN. "We value her as a person, teammate, and friend.

"The sentiments put forward by an anonymous member of our team are not representative of the feelings, values, and opinions of the entire Penn team, composed of 39 women with diverse backgrounds," the statement declared. 

I seriously doubt that this is representative of the feelings, values, and opinions of the whole team. How can a team of athletes work so hard to hopefully place 2nd or 3rd in competition? It's ludicrous!

=====================================================================================



Professor stripped of contact with students over pro-child sex remarks


Stephen Kershnar said it was ‘not obvious’ to him that pedophilic sexual contact

was necessarily wrong



A New York college professor who made remarks in favor of sex between adults and young children has been stripped of contact with students and banned from campus as the college’s investigation continues.

The State University of New York at Fredonia (SUNY Fredonia) launched an investigation this week after video clips of philosophy professor Stephen Kershnar defending pedophilia went viral online.

In the clips, Kershnar said it was “not obvious to me that it is in fact wrong” for adults to have sex with willing children and that “the notion that it’s wrong even with a one-year-old is not quite obvious” either. Kershnar even claimed there was a “good reason to believe that there’s actually a strong benefit to adult-child sex.”

After social media users called for Kershnar to be fired, SUNY Fredonia President Stephen H. Kolison issued a statement on Tuesday claiming that the matter was under review.

“The views expressed by the professor are reprehensible and do not represent the values of SUNY Fredonia in any way, shape or form,” Kolison said.

And yet you knew he had those views years ago...

On Thursday, Kolison issued an update to the investigation and revealed that Kershnar had since been prohibited from having contact with his students.

Effective immediately and until further notice, the professor is being assigned to duties that do not include his physical presence on campus and will not have contact with students while the investigation is ongoing

“Please allow me to reiterate my earlier statement that I view the content of the video as absolutely abhorrent,” Kolison continued, adding that he “cannot stress strongly enough that the independent viewpoints of this individual professor are in no way representative of the values of the SUNY Fredonia campus.”

Kershnar, however, had been making similar remarks for over twenty years and had authored a book on pedophilia and adult-child sex in 2015. SUNY Fredonia’s official profile for Kershnar even boasted that the professor had written extensively “on such diverse topics” as “adult-child sex,” among other things.

Kershnar has a history of making controversial arguments and has written articles titled, ‘For Torture: A Rights-Based Defense’, ‘A Liberal Argument for Slavery’, and ‘For Discrimination Against Women’.