Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!

3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Give Thanks. There is more to this prayer here

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Showing posts with label child sex abuse material. Show all posts
Showing posts with label child sex abuse material. Show all posts

Saturday, 1 August 2026

CSA Globally > Global Pervert facing 68 CSA charges in Toronto

 

57-year-old Toronto man charged with using Snapchat, TikTok, and Fortnite to lure children




Published:

A Toronto Police Services logo is shown at headquarters, in Toronto, on Friday, August 9, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christopher Katsarov

A Toronto man who allegedly used Snapchat, TikTok, and Fortnite to lure and exploit at least 15 children in Canada, the U.S., Australia, and the U.K. is facing 68 charges.

Police revealed Wednesday that they received a report in March about child sexual abuse and exploitation material (CSAEM) being uploaded to social media.

That led police to execute a search warrant at a residence near Broadview Street and Danforth Avenue in April. Investigators said they found electronic devices that belonged to the accused and contained CSAEM.


Police said they also discovered the suspect had used false personas and identities—including pretending to be a female—to lure and exploit children online.

Metin Ugur, 57, was arrested on April 16 and charged with two counts each of accessing child sexual abuse and exploitation material and possessing child sexual abuse and exploitation material, among other offences.

The name Ugur is of Turkish origin and so probably indicates a Muslim bent. Note that the girls he lured were from English-speaking and generally white countries. This makes me wonder if he, like the UK's Pakistani Muslim groomers, believed he had the right to abuse little white girls because they were kafir?

Police alleged that he used the aliases “Chase_woolf,” “Chase_woolf13,” “Noah.scout,” “Noah_scout_13” for his male online persona and “Hey_woolfie” for his female persona. They said that Ugur also used Discord and Instagram to communicate with his victims.

As the investigation unfolded, police said they located additional victims located in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, as well as in the U.S., Australia, Scotland, and England.


Investigators laid an additional 61 charges against Ugur as a result, including 14 counts of luring a person under 18 years old and seven counts of making available sexually explicit matter to a person under 18 years old.

“Internet Child Exploitation has no borders, and neither do our investigations. The investigation is ongoing, and we will go where the evidence leads, working with our local and international partners to identify potential victims,” Det. Sgt. Alicia Murray, of the Sex Crimes Unit - Internet Child Exploitation, said in a statement. “Investigators believe there may be additional victims and are asking anyone with information to come forward.”

Police told CTV News they do not have a photo of the accused.

Anyone with information about the investigation is asked to contact police at 416−808−8500 or Crime Stoppers anonymously.

=================================================================================


Sunday, 19 July 2026

CSAM in Europe > "Chat Control" measures draw the ire of MEPs who seem to care less about children being sexually abused

 

Why the EU’s so-called Chat Control law has privacy experts up in arms


The European Parliament has approved extraordinary measures to fight child sex abuse online. The rules have been dubbed "Chat Control" by critics, who warn of mass surveillance. Supporters reject these claims and argue a balance between protecting children and privacy rights is possible.





Big tech platforms will once again be allowed to voluntarily scan private messages on social media platforms for child sexual abuse material (CSAM), after the European Parliament last week revived a derogation to e-Privacy rules that it had previously struck down in March.

In what critics have described as a political manoeuvre using a legal loophole, the EU’s temporary CSAM framework was brought back to the table in a vote in Strasbourg on July 9. Although more MEPs opposed it than supported it, the absolute majority needed to reject it was not reached.

The interim measures that allow the scanning of messages will now remain in force until 2028, allowing social media and messaging platforms to voluntarily scan for child sexual abuse material. They do not apply to end-to-end encrypted messages used by apps such as WhatsApp or Signal.

But digital rights and privacy organisations are up in arms anyway, arguing that the rules are draconian and amount to mass surveillance. They refer to them as "Chat Control."

'It's a big breach of our digital rights'

Speaking to Euronews, Simeon de Brouwer from the European Digital Rights (EDRi) association argued that the policy means the EU is "outsourcing to private companies the work of law enforcement without any safeguards".

"It’s a big breach of our digital rights and goes against basic EU values," he argued. "It’s a blank cheque to companies, mostly American ones, to look through all our emails and every photo and video we send to each other and then report it to an American centre that then reports it to EU law enforcement."

The measures adopted last week, referred to by EDRi and other digital rights experts as Chat Control 1.0, are temporary and will eventually be replaced by a permanent regulation, first proposed by the European Commission in 2022.

Talks on the final shape of the law have long been stalled amid political infighting and fierce lobbying. But according to Euronews sources, negotiations are now on track and EU negotiators may be close to reaching a deal.

With talks set to resume after the summer recess, de Brouwer welcomes the fact that, for now, Chat Control 2.0 will not include the scanning of encrypted messages.

"That's very important for journalists who need encrypted communications to protect their sources, and for human rights defenders who are targeted by governments because of the work they do," he explained.

'No one is interested in a general system of mass surveillance'

On the other side of the debate is the European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the European Parliament.

The EPP categorically rejects the concept of "Chat Control" and argues that without the temporary framework — what critics call Chat Control 1.0 — there would have been serious repercussions for the EU's efforts to combat online child sexual abuse.

"Our goal was to close a legal loophole that removed the legal basis for detecting child sexual abuse material. And I’m confident that the permanent regulation will strike a balance between privacy and children's rights," Jeroen Lenaers, a Dutch MEP from the EPP, told Euronews.

Lenaers also rejects claims that "Chat Control" amounts to mass surveillance.

"If you read the text, you very clearly see that this simply doesn’t exist. Neither the member states nor the European Parliament is interested in a system of general surveillance."

He accused the far-right, far-left and the Greens in the European Parliament of "setting up a massive public campaign about this with little regard for the facts of the matter, using bold messaging about big, deep states".

Lenaers also invited EU lawmakers who oppose the current and future rules to combat online child sexual abuse to put forward alternatives to address concerns about giving too much power to private companies.

"Let’s put a proposal on the table to give the police and law enforcement the competences."

'It's crazy that protecting children is not the priority'

While the political battle over a permanent framework continues, children's rights advocates are urging EU lawmakers to take action.

"Every single second, it's estimated that 10 children are being sexually abused online," Scharliina Eräpuro, a Finnish-Swedish singer and survivor of child sexual abuse, told Euronews.

Scharliina also criticised what she sees as politically motivated arguments against the rules.

"I have a feeling that politicians voting against the legislation don't actually even know the details. We can ensure that there is privacy and that children are protected."

For her, protecting children online should be a top EU priority.

"It’s crazy that it is not," she said, adding that she expects long-term solutions that also take AI-generated child sexual abuse material into account.

Reacting to critics of the legislation, Scharliina said she felt "disappointed" that children and their rights are not at the centre of the discussion. "For me, obviously, it’s a clear stand. And I understand there are privacy concerns, but what about the privacy of the children?"

She had one final message for EU co-legislators ahead of negotiations on the permanent framework.

"They should be able to find a middle ground. I would be incredibly disappointed if they don’t. Europe can be an incredible role model for the rest of the world since around 60% of known child sexual abuse material is hosted here."

For this story, Euronews also contacted Members of the European Parliament who opposed the temporary rules. They did not accept our request for an interview.




Saturday, 18 July 2026

Musk sues AI user for creating CSAM on Grok

 

Elon Musk’s xAI sues user over allegedly creating child sexual abuse materials with Grok




Elon Musk’s xAI sued a user on Tuesday, alleging he used the Grok chatbot to create child sexual abuse materials. It’s one of the first lawsuits filed by a tech company against users who allegedly create explicit content with AI.

Musk’s company alleged in the lawsuit that a user named Terry Wayne Harwood violated its terms of service “to convert non-sexual photographs into sexually explicit images without the photograph subjects’ knowledge or consent.” Harwood, along with three other men, was arrested earlier this year in South Carolina on multiple counts of alleged sexual exploitation of a minor.

CNN has reached out to the attorney representing Harwood in his criminal case for comment.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, alleges Harwood created multiple xAI accounts and entered “misleading prompts” to create explicit deepfakes of both minors and adults.

The lawsuit further alleges that Harwood designed prompts it characterized as “misleading” in order to “circumvent” what it described as “built-in safeguards” to prevent against the creation of explicit material depicting minors.

“Defendant breached the xAI Terms of Service and Acceptable Use Policy by leveraging Grok to generate non-consensual sexually explicit images and CSAM,” or child sexual abuse material, the suit adds.

Earlier this year, Grok came under fire for a tool that allowed “digital undressing,” including AI-generated images of children. After users began noticing a surge in non-consensual, sexualized deepfakes late last year, Musk and xAI said they would take action against such illegal use of the AI. “Anyone using Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content,” Musk write in a January 6 social media post quoted in the suit.

Harwood’s alleged misuse of Grok exposed xAI “to significant legal risk and reputational damage,” the lawsuit alleged.

In the lawsuit, xAI claims that it “has suspended 52,222 accounts and made 73,604 reports to (National Center for Missing & Exploited Children) in 2026, resulting in (at least) 244 arrests.”

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that Harwood broke the site’s Terms of Service and unspecified damages.

xAI has faced scrutiny over its chatbot before. Last year, ​the company posted a lengthy apology for a series of violent and antisemitic posts from Grok, placing the blame on a system update.

===============================================================


Friday, 10 July 2026

Grok's expanding lawsuit over CSAM

 

xAI faces expanding lawsuit over Grok’s alleged failure to flag child sex abuse images

xAI faces expanding lawsuit over Grok’s alleged failure to flag child sex abuse images

An amended class action accuses Elon Musk's AI company of building tools that enabled predators and obstructed police investigations into CSAM deepfakes

An expanded class action lawsuit against xAI now includes some of the most disturbing allegations yet leveled at a major AI company: that its Grok image-generation tools were used to produce thousands of child sexual abuse images, and that the company actively obstructed law enforcement efforts to investigate the material.

The amended complaint, filed in US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges that a young girl’s stepfather used Grok to generate 7,000 sexually explicit images from a single photograph taken when his stepdaughter was 11 years old. The stepfather took his own life in March after police discovered the material.

The scale of the problem

The lawsuit, originally filed on March 16, 2026, was brought by three Tennessee plaintiffs, including two minors, and seeks nationwide class-action status for what could be thousands of victims.

Reports cited in connection with the case estimate that Grok produced between 1.8 million and 3 million sexualized images in early January 2026 alone. Of those, roughly 23,000 allegedly depicted children.

The plaintiffs argue the company knowingly produced and profited from tools that lacked industry-standard safeguards, the kind of protections that competitors like OpenAI and Meta have already implemented, including red-teaming protocols, content filters, and automated detection systems.

Grok was noted for its comparatively permissive output capabilities, including a feature called “Spicy Mode” that loosened content restrictions.

A growing legal and regulatory siege

The California Attorney General launched a separate investigation into the company in January 2026. Multiple state attorneys general have joined in coordinated actions. The City of Baltimore filed its own consumer protection lawsuit against xAI and its affiliates on March 24, 2026.

One perpetrator referenced in the broader proceedings reportedly generated explicit content using minors’ social media and yearbook photos. That individual was arrested in December 2025.

The plaintiffs allege that beyond enabling the creation of CSAM, xAI shielded child predators by obstructing police investigations into Grok-generated material.

The victims described in the lawsuit report anxiety, reputational damage, and lasting psychological harm. The class action framework suggests their attorneys believe the pool of affected minors extends well beyond the named plaintiffs.

Grok is my favourite AI tool but it is very disappointing that someone hasn't been fired over this disaster. It suggests that Musk approved of the release of Grok long before it was safe to do so. That is very disappointing because I have a lot of faith in Musk's inherent goodness. I hope, and pray, that he gets control of Grok and starts protecting our women and children rather than contributing to their sexual and emotional abuse.

=======================================================


Monday, 6 July 2026

CSA in India > India gives Meta a week to remove CSA content and adverts

 

India gives Meta week to remove child sexual abuse content from Instagram

Action comes after a BBC Eye investigation reveals paid Instagram adverts promoting child sexual abuse material in the country

Saturday, 4 July 2026

CSA in India > BBC confronts META for running Child Sex Abuse ads in India

 

BBC confronts head of Meta in India over child sex abuse ads




Hours after the investigation was published, the Indian government said it had summoned representatives of Meta over the adverts.



Instagram running ads promoting child sexual abuse material in India, BBC finds

Divya Arya

BBC World Service

Warning: This story contains descriptions of abuse

Instagram has been running paid adverts promoting child sexual abuse material in India, a BBC Eye investigation has found.

The ads, seen by the BBC World Service, use terms including "rape video" and "child video" and link users to channels on the messaging app Telegram, where they can buy the material for as little as 99 rupees (about 80p).

Hours after this investigation was published, the Indian government said it had summoned representatives of Instagram's parent company, Meta, over the adverts.

Ads on Instagram are only published after first being approved by its moderation technology.

When the BBC reported one of the ads to Instagram, the social media platform responded 24 hours later saying the post did not violate its "community guidelines".

Is that a comment on Indian society?

Later, when the BBC asked Meta for comment, it said it had already disabled several adverts and suspended the accounts posting them. The company said it had removed additional ads, disabled more accounts and blocked URLs for other content that violated its policies in response to the BBC's findings.

Telegram said it had removed more than 274,000 groups and channels related to child sexual abuse material in 2026.

The BBC set up an alias account on Instagram after we noticed that the platform was pushing sexually suggestive content, even when a user hadn't searched for such material.

This included women posting about food, weather and daily life in India, who were dressed in revealing clothing and using sexual innuendo in their posts.

The new alias account, which was set up in India, started following these women and other similar people - 10 in all - to investigate sexualised content on the platform.

In less than a week, Instagram started showing advertisements on the feed featuring women offering video calls and showing clearly naked couples having sex.

Days later, it began showing adverts of children with adults in sexually suggestive situations, with links to Telegram channels.

Madan Lokur is stood in a room with white walls, looking at the camera. He is wearing a sleeveless jacket over a white top and has grey hair and a grey beard. 


A retired justice of India's Supreme Court, Madan Lokur, said he was concerned that Instagram was "making money by participating in a criminal activity"

In total, about 30 unique adverts appeared promoting child sexual abuse, although some of these were shared by multiple accounts.

The alias account was also shown about 20 ads featuring adult pornography.

The distribution of both child sexual abuse material and adult pornography are criminal offences in India, while Meta's policy states that ads must not contain adult nudity, genitals or content that sexually exploits or endangers children. The BBC has reported all of the ads and the Telegram channels to the Indian authorities.

One ad showed a boy and girl, both of whom appeared to be about 12 years old, engaging in a sexual act.

Another showed a man with his arm around a girl, with text saying he was 52 and the girl was 12. "Click to watch more," it said, linking out to a Telegram channel.

The BBC reported an advert to Instagram showing a very young girl in tears, with wording indicating that she had been sexually assaulted.

But 24 hours later, Instagram replied saying it hadn't removed the advert because "our review team found that the advertiser's ad does not go against our community standards".

Meta later told the BBC that "no system is perfect, and our review process may not detect all policy violations".

"We continue to run proactive detection technology on ads once they're live, and anyone can report an ad to us that they think breaks our rules," Meta said.

It added that when it becomes aware of apparent child exploitation it reports it to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), in compliance with the law. The NCMEC is the centralised global reporting system for the online sexual exploitation of children.

We reported two channels to Telegram for selling child sexual abuse videos.

One of them was subsequently taken down and replaced with a message saying: "This group can't be displayed because it violated Telegram's Terms of Service," but the other continued to post new videos for sale.

Critics have previously accused the platform of not doing enough to prevent the sharing of criminal content.

The Dubai-based company is not a member of the NCMEC. It joined the Internet Watch Foundation, which also works with most online platforms to find, report and remove such material, in late 2024.

Telegram told the BBC that the company uses both automated and human moderation to eradicate child sexual abuse material (CSAM) from the app, and as a result it says it has "virtually eliminated the public spread of CSAM from its platform".

Adverts are an important source of income for Meta.

In January, it reported that almost 98% of its $200bn (£152bn) revenue for the financial year ending 2025 came from advertising. Analysts estimate that ads account for more than 90% of Instagram's revenue.

While standard posts are not generally checked by Meta's technology until they are published, Meta says every advert is reviewed before being allowed on its platforms.

Its review system relies primarily on automated technology and is designed to check images, video, text and audio, as well as who the ad is targeting and where links send them to.

This software then rejects or approves adverts, escalating cases for human review when it is uncertain.

In March, Meta announced it was reducing its reliance on third-party human moderators and increasing the use of AI, adding that "experts will design, train, oversee, and evaluate our AI systems".

The BBC described the ads we had seen to a retired justice of India's Supreme Court, Madan Lokur, who was concerned that Instagram was "making money by participating in a criminal activity".

"This is a serious enough issue for the Supreme Court of India to take suo moto cognisance [when a court initiates legal proceedings without waiting for a case to be brought by someone else] and get the government to act against any social media platform," he says.

Justice Lokur added that despite Indian law protecting social media companies from being held liable for content uploaded by users, "the platform cannot, cannot shirk its responsibility".

Brian Boland, who used to work as a vice-president for Facebook, said Instagram's algorithm was designed to keep users on the platform by showing them "something more extreme, more tantalising"

A former vice-president of Facebook, as Meta used to be known until it changed name in 2021, said he was "horrified and unsurprised" by the BBC's findings.

Brian Boland, who worked for the company between 2009 and 2020 and helped build the advertising and marketing business, said he left because he believed "they didn't care about users anywhere".

He said Instagram's algorithm was designed to keep users on the platform by showing them "something more extreme, more tantalising".

"It's not like an algorithm that says 'let's make people paedophiles', but because they're not responsibly guiding and controlling it - and it's just pursuing the goals of revenue and clicks - it will create these outcomes if people aren't being truly, aggressively protective over these systems."

Boland said that between 2009 and 2010 he led a project to remove adverts that were scamming users, which meant he "was allowed to, at the time, remove a massive part of the revenue of the company in the sake of user safety and user experience".

"I think what's sad and tragic is over time, the trade-off of revenue and user experience became a more core part of the conversation."

He says he deleted his Instagram account in 2025, adding: "If people en masse started to say, 'I'm out, I'm done, forget it,' the company would pay attention."

In a statement sent to the BBC, Meta said: "Child exploitation is a horrific crime and Meta works aggressively to fight it on our apps."

It said it was "categorially inaccurate" to suggest that Meta knowingly and deliberately targeted ads featuring children to users with an inappropriate interest in such material.

The company denied prioritising revenue over safety and said that in 2025 it automatically disabled more than four million accounts for showing "enough signals of potentially suspicious behavior".

"While determined criminals try to evade detection, our expert teams are constantly working to improve our defenses, developing new technology to root out predators, blocking links to violating websites, and sharing intelligence with other companies so they can take action too," Meta added.

Boland testified against Meta in a trial in the US state of New Mexico earlier this year, in which it was accused of misleading users over the safety of its platforms for children.

The court ordered Meta to pay $375m (£279m) to New Mexico. At the time, a spokeswoman for the company said it disagreed with the verdict and intended to appeal.

Shikha Goel is pictured inside the Cyber Security Bureau. She has long, dark hair and is wearing a bright green dress with flowers.


Shikha Goel, of Telangana's Cyber Security Bureau, says they receive more alerts from Meta's platforms than any others

US-based social media companies are mandated to report child sexual abuse material on their platform to the NCMEC Cyber Tipline.

The tipline then refers the report to the appropriate law enforcement agency in the country it believes the incident occurred.

In 2025, India received 1.9 million reports, second only to the United States with two million.

One of India's top cyber police officers, Shikha Goel, who is director of the Cyber Security Bureau in the Indian state of Telangana, said Instagram and Facebook, both owned by Meta, generated the most tiplines.

"But that does not mean they are the largest," she said. "If they have a good algorithm to track child sexual abuse material, then obviously more alerts will be generated."

A Mumbai-based NGO, the Rati Foundation, which runs a helpline service for children facing online harms, also said that the vast majority of reports it receives on child sexual abuse material come from Meta platforms.

It collaborates with social media platforms to help get harmful content removed, but co-founder and director Siddharth Pillai said that "criminals use the seamless navigation from Instagram to Telegram to evade our moderation efforts, and keep reuploading the content we help take down".

Experts said child sexual abuse material in India was usually created by criminal groups, such as human traffickers, although family and community members were also sometimes responsible.

Bhuwan Ribhu, the founder of Just Rights for Children, a network of more than 250 organisations working to prevent violence against children in India, said the crime was not reported enough and police were still trying to develop the technical skills to tackle it.

And to do that successfully, he said international co-operation and intelligence sharing across borders was vital.

In order to "find the tentacles of organised crime, the entire chain of demand and supply needs to be tracked", he said.