UK: Muslim cleric repeatedly rapes young boy, got 16 years prison for similar behavior in 2011
“The judge said that while he was being sentenced for the offences of more than a quarter of a century ago, ‘there has been further serious offending of a strikingly similar type in the intervening period.'”
Why was he out of prison at all if he was sentenced to 16 years in 2011? Prisoners in Britain hardly ever serve their full sentences, and of course, authorities don’t want to appear “Islamophobic.”
“Those are the ones who will be brought near in gardens of delight, a multitude of those of old and a few of those of later times. On lined couches, reclining on them face to face. Immortal boys wait on them with bowls and ewers and a cup from a pure spring.” (Qur’an 56:11-18)
“There they are watered with a cup of which the mixture is of ginger, a spring in it, named Salsabil. There wait on them immortal youths, whom, when you see them, you would take them for scattered pearls. When you look, you will see bliss and high estate there.” (Qur’an 76:17-20)
Bradford mosque teacher has been jailed for 13 years
by Tony Earnshaw, Telegraph & Argus, June 20, 2025:
A “trusted” Muslim cleric who repeatedly raped a young boy whilst working as a teacher at a Bradford mosque has been handed an extended jail sentence.
Mohammed Hanif Khan will serve 13 years in prison plus a further three years on licence for a series of sex attacks on the victim more than a quarter of a century ago.
Khan, 57, of Blagden Street, Sheffield, appeared via video link from HMP Leeds for the hearing at Bradford Crown Court….
Sentencing Khan, His Honour Judge Christopher Smith told Khan: “You were a respected member of the teaching staff.”…
He also referred to Khan’s previous conviction for “strikingly similar” behaviour at Stoke-on-Trent in 2009, for which he received 16 years’ imprisonment in 2011.
His offending in Bradford pre-dated the Stoke assaults.
Judge Smith said Khan could have brought those earlier rapes to the attention of the police when he was charged with the Stoke offences “but you chose not to do so”.
He said: “I am satisfied that you do continue to present a risk of committing such offences.”
The judge said that while he was being sentenced for the offences of more than a quarter of a century ago, “there has been further serious offending of a strikingly similar type in the intervening period”.
“You accept only limited responsibility for your actions and there is a continuing lack of genuine insight,” he said….
No comments:
Post a Comment