What Kind of Person Did We Elect as Prime Minister? What Skeletons Lie in His Closet?

WHY DID JUSTIN TRUDEAU ABRUPTLY LEAVE WEST POINT GREY SCHOOL MID-TERM?

Warren Kinsella

The War Room

The question isn’t going away. But neither is it being pursued!

Trudeau’s story has changed at least four times since 2001

After media reports revealed that Justin Trudeau wore blackface during an event at West Point Grey Academy, Canadians have been asking why exactly Justin Trudeau left his teaching job at the school. It’s understandable why people have questions, after all Trudeau’s story has changed four times since 2001.

First, the Ottawa Citizen reported in 2001 that Trudeau would “give up his teaching job at a Vancouver private school next September to give speeches.” Several days later this claim was refuted by Trudeau in a statement issued by law firm Heenan Blaikie. The Montreal Gazette reported Trudeau was accepting a teaching job at a public school.

In his 2014 autobiography, Trudeau says he left the school after a dispute with the administration over an article written in the school newspaper. According to Trudeau, he convinced a student to write an article criticizing the fact that the girls at the school were never reprimanded for the way they dress. This article was deemed disrespectful by the school’s administration.

The Vancouver Sun reported in 2015 that the reason Trudeau left the school was “in part over a dispute over dress code and values.”

In a 2019 book by John Ivison, Trudeau’s departure is summed up as “a disagreement over an article written by a student for which Trudeau was responsible”.

On October 4, 2019 Trudeau said he left the school “because [he] was moving on with [his] life”.

That same day, the former headmaster of the school said that Trudeau left the school because he was going to study to be an engineer.

Why did Justin Trudeau leave West Point Grey Academy? What’s the real reason? Why has his story changed so many times, and if the above reports are incorrect, why hasn’t Trudeau corrected the record?

Of course, if you think any of the above is the real reason why Trudeau left West Point Grey, keep reading. The Buffalo Chronicle, one of the very few media outlets honest enough to report the truth, and not eligible for the $600m Trudeau promised those outlets that reported the truth (according to Justin), tells us at least some of what went on, apparently:

‘Blackface’ Trudeau Paid Over $2 Million to Cover Up Alleged

Underage Sex Affair Before Election

By Shane Trejo, Big League Politics
The Buffalo Chronicle

As Canadians went to the polls, Monday, to decide whether or not to keep Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in power, voters will not be informed of the intimate details of his alleged sexual affair with an underage girl, who was reportedly silenced after reaching a multi-million dollar settlement.

The Buffalo Chronicle reported that Trudeau’s underage accuser received $2.25 million as apart of a mutual non-disclosure non-disparagement agreement that she signed last week. Her father told The Chronicle that she was under the age of 17 during the time of the alleged inappropriate relationship.

The Chronicle received a copy of the agreement for a brief period by the accuser’s father and were able to examine it. The father claims he received the agreement by mistake via email after he was CC’d a copy by the parties as they were negotiating.

The illicit affair allegedly happened while Trudeau was teaching at West Point Grey Academy in Vancouver, nearly 20 years ago. After his accuser’s father found out about the affair at their family’s home, a clamor began to remove Trudeau from his position. West Point Grey Academy was unwilling to confirm any of these details to reporters.

And Canada's Liberal media was not interested enough to pursue the matter! Had the matter concerned Andrew Sheer, it would have been front-page news every day of the election campaign.

The father claims he discovered the affair shortly after the death of Trudeau’s father, Pierre, who was a popular long-time Prime Minister. Trudeau’s friends say that the impropriety likely occurred due to a depression stemming from the death of his father and younger brother, Michel, who was killed by an avalanche while skiing in 1998.

“He was lonely and depressed for months,” one of Trudeau’s friends told The Chronicle.

I wonder if that friend was the his roommate at West Point Grey, who later was jailed for child pornography? See below.

During the time of Trudeau’s alleged affair, the sex acts would have been technically legal, as the age of consent was only 14. It was then raised to 16 in 2008 by Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper. However, the act would have likely been illegal under a Canadian law that prevents someone under the age of 18 from having sexual relations with an individual in a position of authority over them.

Trudeau has not made any denials of the claims levied against him by the newspaper. The editors of The Chronicle stand by their work, and imply that the silence from the chronically blackfaced Canadian leader is deafening.

“To date, Trudeau has not offered a public denial of The Buffalo Chronicle’s reporting. Instead, he has instructed his communications staffers to decline to answer those questions and to attack the credibility of this publication,” they wrote.

When you can't argue the message, you destroy the messenger!

“The Buffalo Chronicle has never — in our entire operating history — been sued for defamation or any other matter. We have never once received a cease and desist letter from the subjects of any article since we began publishing in 2014,” they added.

Regarding Christopher Ingvaldson - Trudeau's WPG Roomie

Amy MacPherson

Free the Press Canada

Excerpt from: PM Trudeau’s ‘Cousin’ Exposes #MeToo Scandal Involving Liberalist Data

Chris is your ex-roommate from Vancouver that no one is allowed to talk about. His story is compelling to this pattern of sexual predators, but it’s also how you might have been infected with the Look Away Disease. I’m sorry we have to go there, but it’s necessary to wake you up and I say this from the bottom of my heart.

So your bestie from the west coast was a fellow teacher at private school. You shared what sounds like a rockin’ apartment and you were reported to be quite the ladies’ man. Althea Raj from the Huffington Post wrote a free e-book to promote your bid for leadership and she detailed these high times in BC. It seems you lived together, worked together, and partied together, with the accused.

But it appears Althea wasn’t aware of your roommate’s conviction for child pornography. When she was fawning about the popularity of your apartment, did she know that Chris pleaded guilty to exploiting children at your home and shared workplace? The details of his case were upsetting and included a breach of trust. It’s no wonder you didn’t want to talk about it, but you must.

It should be stated that Trudeau's roommate was charged many years after Trudeau left West Point Grey. Ingvaldson continued to teach for some years at WPG and then at another Vancouver area school for several years before his pedophilia became known.

Was he a practicing pedophile when he was Justin's roommate? Who knows? He certainly doesn't seem to have been bothered by Justin hooking up with one of his students.

As mentioned above, the left-wing media will never actually investigate or even mention these issues for fear of disparaging their far-left darling. Truth has no place in main-stream media; it is completely ignored. The end justifies the means. Trudeau and the media mean to make Canada as far-left as they possibly can. It is quickly becoming unrecognizable, and they believe that's a good thing.

Bill Clinton is Massively Overdue for a #MeToo Reckoning: Robyn Urback

I love this young woman, Robyn Urback! She's a brilliant writer and, although she writes for CBC News - a hopelessly left-leaning institution of Canadian Liberalism, she manages to question the Mainstream Media's hypocrisy on a number of subjects. Go girl!

Clinton cites his feminist policy achievements as if they are

some sort of anti-venom to his past behaviour

Robyn Urback · CBC News 

Somewhere now in Camp Clinton, expert communicators are curling the ribbons on the package of manure that Bill Clinton will offer as a prepared response to questions about #MeToo. (Patrick Semansky/Associated Press)

So many things would be different if the world were just and good: your high school bully would end up in jail, dogs would evolve to outlive humans, and one of America's most famous sexual predators would be destitute and alone, eating chilli out of a can in sweat-stained pyjamas.

Instead, he is set to travel North America with his wife on an upcoming speaking tour, which could cost attendees up to $750 US a pop. With two scheduled stops in Canada, the tour will see Bill and Hillary Clinton share "stories and inspiring anecdotes that shaped their historic careers in public service, while also discussing issues of the day and looking toward the future."

It is to be expected, then, that the former president who lied about having a sexual relationship with a 21-year-old intern in the White House will be asked to weigh in on the current #MeToo movement. Which also means that somewhere now in Camp Clinton, expert communicators are curling the ribbons on the package of manure that Bill Clinton will offer as a prepared response.

Clinton has somehow become a curious figure of both levity and adulation.

It is both utterly baffling and genuinely impressive how, over the course of just a few decades, Clinton has freed himself from the crippling embarrassment of impeachment, the infernal shame of his lies and the moral repugnance of such a demonstrable abuse of power to become this curious figure of both levity and adulation.

But if there is one person in North America who is massively overdue for a #MeToo reckoning, it is him. He is the practical embodiment of everything the movement was designed to reject: abuse of power, privilege, double standards, harassment, sexual abuse and trauma.

Clinton's story involves all of that and more, wrapped up in an allegation of a violent rape, of sexual assault, of harassment, and of course, a sexual relationship with an intern in his office while he held the most powerful job in the country.

To this day, Clinton maintains a rather unrepentant air. When he was pushed about his affair with Monica Lewinsky during a television interview back in June, Clinton lashed out at the interviewer and accused him of ignoring supposed "gaping facts" about the saga. Clinton also noted that he was a victim, too, in that he left the White House $16 million in debt. Let's pause here a moment to appreciate the trauma of the Clintons' fleeting financial insecurity.

Lewinsky, during that time, was made the nation's punchline, villain and slut. Decades before the term "gaslighting" would enter the mainstream lexicon, the president of the United States went on national television and told the world that he "did not have sexual relations with that woman." Clinton's allies painted Lewinsky as a stalker and a manipulator, and even feminist icon Gloria Steinem suggested in a column for the New York Times that Lewinsky was equally at fault for the illicit affair.

Monica Lewinsky will always be 'that woman' first, no matter what else she does in her life. (Reuters)

It would take Lewinsky nearly 20 years to realize that the power imbalance between an unpaid intern and her boss — a man 27 years her senior and also the president of the United States — complicates notions of consent and culpability. She would grapple with post-traumatic stress disorder for decades and struggle to find a clear career path. These are not ordinary consequences for a poor decision; most of us do dumb things we regret in early adulthood, but few of us are defined by them for the rest of our lives.

Monica Lewinsky will always be "that woman" first, no matter what else she does in her life. But for Bill Clinton, the label of "sexual predator" somehow never stuck much beyond a footnote.

To be clear, this is not about politics. Sexual harassment happens on both sides of the aisle, and getting away with it happens on both sides of the aisle, too (See: Trump, Donald).

Nor is this about forever saddling a man to his past bad behaviour as some sort of petty exercise in retribution. I have written before about the need to find a way forward for men who have taken ownership of certain past abhorrent acts, and in theory, that could apply here, too.

But that ownership still eludes Bill Clinton, who will cite his feminist policy achievements as if they are some sort of anti-venom to his decidedly anti-feminist personal behaviour. Decades on, Clinton still has never privately apologized to Lewinsky for abusing his authority, or for making her out to be a liar, or for his lack of judgment in an affair that ruined her life, but not his.

So this is — or ought to be — about a long, long overdue reckoning for a man who was lucky enough to time his bad behaviour a few decades before we collectively knew what it meant to gaslight and to victim-blame. Before our understanding of consent evolved. A reckoning for someone who should have, by now, genuinely admitted the profound depravity of his actions.

If the world were just and good, one of America's most well-known and unrepentant sexual predators would be forced to cancel his speaking tour before it even begins. If the world were just and good, his time would really be up.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Robyn Urback

Columnist

Robyn Urback is an opinion columnist with CBC News and a producer with the CBC's Opinion section. She previously worked as a columnist and editorial board member at the National Post. Follow her on Twitter at:

@RobynUrback