Keith Vaz MP has resigned from chairing the Home Affairs Select Committee, which oversees the IICSA child sexual abuse inquiry. This follows Vaz being caught paying male prostitutes for sex, being willing to buy cocaine and using poppers .
Many people felt that he was the wrong person to chair this committee, as he was widely seen as being at least a gatekeeper to prevent proper investigation into child sexual abuse. He has not as yet resigned from being a member of that committee, but it can only be a matter of time.
It has also been known for over a year that Vaz was being investigated for child sexual abuse, yet he was allowed to be chair of a very influential committee into child sexual abuse. Why?
The Sun  reported in Jun 2015 that an anonymous MP
HAD lads “delivered” to his room at a hotel near a police station
ABUSED boys at a hospital’s mental health unit
LEFT one so terrified he fears for his life if he ever speaks out
SHOWED an “unhealthy” interest in the two young sons of a local councillor
DISPLAYED a liking for “young ragamuffins”, and
WAS seen as untouchable by police because of his revered position.
Mail  reported that Andrew Bridgen who had reported Vaz to the Police was receiving a campaign of vilification from Vaz.
It is of interest that Vaz, a fellow Leicestershire MP, was a staunch defender of Greville Janner MP, the child abuser, and perhaps owed his advancement to Janner 
It is also of interest that Vaz was a solicitor in Richmond at the time of Elm Guest House , Keith Vaz and the Mystery of Barnes Common  which he strangely cannot recall.
Odd, isn't it, that child sex abuse survivors often have suppressed memories emerge, while child sex abusers often have memories that are suddenly repressed.
When Vaz was renominated for the post in Jun 2015 it was notable that although his opponent Fiona McTaggart talked child abuse, sexual violence and human child trafficking, Keith Vaz avoided this  but did manage to mention legal highs.
What influence did Vaz have over the agenda of the Home Affairs Select Committee? Did he instigate the inquiry into the woman who accused Leon Brittan of rape, whilst sidelining all the other accusations against Leon Brittan?
Vaz seems to have lived a charmed life. Bridgen also accused Vaz of performing political favours for the owner of a brothel in his constituency in which men consorted with underage males, and made further allegations about drink-driving, assault and corruption .
He has also been accused of conflict of interest over lobbying for immigration visas  and a suspicious £500,000  .
How has he lived this charmed life?
MI5 must have known Vaz was a security risk. They are complicit or useless.
Was he another being protected by MI5 for blackmail purposes by those who are really in control of "Britains" unaccountable secret services. Who is really in control of them?
Why was Vaz allowed to chair a committee of such importance to the IICSA child sexual abuse inquiry, when he himself was being investigated for child sexual abuse?
What are the government guidelines for this sort of case?
Did the chairing of this committee whilst being investigated not contravene any standards for professional life or MPs?
What do Leicestershire Police and other forces know of the sex life of Keith Vaz and his links to child sexual abuse, and the cover up of Janners child sexual abuse?
There is much more on Cathy's blog