..
Why Is An Afghan Muslim Rapist Given Police Protection In Germany?
DEC 19, 2022 10:00 AM
BY HUGH FITZGERALD
Jihad Watch
Two and a half years ago, Mukhtar N., a 29-year-old Afghan, took part in the gang-rape of a 14-year-old German girl by four Muslim migrants who had been allowed into Germany. Apparently free housing, medical care, and education (to the extent that these economic migrants would want it), food allowances, and more, were not enough; they also felt entitled to make free with Infidel girls who, by their dress and manner, are in their Muslim view “just asking for it.” Now that Afghan rapist is out on the streets. He served two and a half years in prison. Why was he given such a light sentence? Was it because, as an Afghan, he didn’t understand German mores, and couldn’t be expected to follow rules that were so foreign to his way of thinking? He was supposed to be deported after finishing his sentence. But that hasn’t happened. No police have arrived to take him to the airport. Nor has he been punished for ignoring one of the conditions of his freedom: that he check in daily at the Town Hall, so the authorities can keep track of his whereabouts. And because the local government fears that he might be harmed by someone – say, the father or brother of the 14-year-old girl who was raped by four Muslim men over many hours – it has provided him with round-the-clock police protection. What’s wrong with this picture? Everything.
“Outrage after Afghan gang rapist given police protection in Germany;
interior ministry refuses to deport him,”
by John Cody, ReMix News,
December 16, 2022:
After just two and a half years in prison for gang rape, Afghan Mukthar N. is back out on the streets of Illerkirchberg, but this time he enjoys taxpayer-funded police protection. The fact that he is in Illerkirchberg is also notable, given it is on the outskirts of Ulm, a city that made national headlines recently after an Eritrean migrant murdered the 14-year-old girl Ece S.
Authorities say they are “concerned” for the gang rapist’s safety due to growing resentment in Illerkirchberg, which has a troubled asylum home where gang rapists and murderers have menaced the small community.
Just think of that. There is an asylum home where gang rapists and murderers apparently live, or are prepared for a life of such crime, and from where they emerge to “menace the small community.” Why aren’t they being picked up right now by the police? Or better yet, why hasn’t this “asylum home” simply been shut down for good?
The police protection detail reportedly began on the same day of the funeral for Ece S.
The 29-year-old Mukthar N. was already supposed to have been deported, but due to intervention from left-wing Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD), the man has been allowed to stay in Germany. The district continues to try to deport the sex offender, who drugged and raped a girl, also 14 years old at the time, with three other asylum seekers. The ordeal lasted for hours for the young girl.
However, Faeser’s interior ministry argues that such a deportation is not possible due to Taliban rule in Afghanistan.
Is that because the Taliban might actually punish a gang-rapist?
But why would the Taliban be any threat to Mukthar N.? He sounds like a perfectly good Muslim. The Taliban wouldn’t mind that he had been involved in the drugging and gang-rape of a 14-year-old kuffar girl. Far from it – they’d be proud of him for showing the Infidels in Germany what real Muslim men are made of. And besides, such girls are only asking for it. No, he’d fit right in in today’s Afghanistan. Interior Minister Nancy Faeser needn’t worry about his safety.
After Mukthar N.’s prison sentence, the state government sent him back to the scene of the crime, Illerkirchberg, where he now has taxpayer-funded police protection. However, the community was never informed the convicted gang rapist was sent back into their area, despite police saying the man continues to represent “high potential danger of committing further sexual offenses to the detriment of unknown young women.”
So, now, how old is the victim? Would she be 16 or 17? Certainly in her teens and probably living in the same small community as her rapists. How can a judge or Interior Minister approve of such a thing? What protection does the victim have from ever encountering this sick creep? Or any other young, German girl? It is sheer torture for the child, state-sanctioned torture. Madness!
Why not? Did the police not want to set too many people against Mukhtar N. without giving him a chance to prove what a swell fellow he really is, once you get to know him? What conceivable reason did the police have in not letting everyone know about this extreme sex offender, this once-and-likely-future rapist?
Mukthar N. is supposed to report daily to the town hall of the village as a part of his release conditions, but the rejected asylum seeker has fundamentally violated this requirement. Despite this violation, he has faced no consequences.
That was his only requirement – check in daily at the Town Hall. A most modest task for someone who managed to be sentenced to only 2½ years in prison, despite being convicted of the gang-rape of a minor. But even that was apparently too much for Mukhtar N. to comply with. There have been no consequences for his violation of this requirement. Why?
After the murder of Ece S [another German 14-year-old, murdered by another Muslim migrant], who was stabbed to death on her way to school by a migrant from the local asylum home, police fear there will be retribution against asylum seekers in Illerkirchberg. As a result, once news leaked that Mukthar N. was back in Illerkirchberg, police began guarding his home.
His home? He has a home? Why isn’t he back in the asylum with his fellow migrants, enduring collective living with people just like himself?
According to Bild newspaper, the Ulm police headquarters announced, “We also have to worry about his safety. If there is a recommendation we can give him, then of course we will give it to him.”…
Why was Mukhthar N. ever allowed into Germany in the first place?
Why was Mukhtar N. allowed to live on the dole, happily unemployed, for so many years?
Why was Mukhtar N. sentenced to only 2½ years in prison for the gang-rape of a minor?
Why was Mukhtar N. not deported to Afghanistan once he had served his time, as his original sentence required?
Why was the Interior Minister Nancy Faeser not severely reprimanded for her decision to keep Mukhtar N. from being deported, on the absurd grounds that he would not be safe in Taliban-dominated Afghanistan?
Why was Mukhtar N. not sent back to prison for violating the sole condition of his release, which was to check in at the local Town Hall every day?
Why are the German taxpayers paying for police protection for a convicted rapist?
Why? Pourquoi? Warum?
Our minds are not subtle enough to understand. So please help us out. Please explain.
Taliban bans women from getting a university education in Afghanistan
in latest crackdown on female freedoms
By LAUREN HAUGHEY FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 13:40 EST, 20 December 2022 |
Afghan women have been indefinitely banned from receiving a university education, the Taliban made clear today.
The country's Minister for Higher Education, Neda Mohammad Nadeem, issued a letter to all government and private universities ordering for the change to be made.
It said: 'You all are informed to implement the mentioned order of suspending education of females until further notice.'
This development is the latest in the series of restrictions as the Taliban increasingly cracks down on female freedoms.
Afghan women have been indefinitely banned from receiving a university education, the Taliban made clear today
Although women had been allowed to continue their university education following the Taliban takeover on August 15 last year, it was provided that they learned in segregated classrooms and covered themselves according the group's interpretation of Sharia law.
But the months following saw women banned from attending classes at Kabul University, in the nation's capital, as an 'Islamic environment' had not yet been created.
Young girls were also excluded from returning to secondary school and the women's ministry was replaced with an all-male 'vice and virtue' department.
Funfairs and gyms have even become no-go areas for women due to the Taliban's restrictions on women's rights.
While Afghan women have fought for and gained basic rights in the past 20 years, millions have now been forced to stay at home and abandon their ambitions.
Seventeen-year-old Fatima who aspired to be an engineer told The Daily Mail last year: 'Today we do not know what tomorrow will bring, so how can we talk about our futures? Perhaps I will try to go abroad. We have a lot of intelligent girls here. But we are trapped.'
The country's Minister for Higher Education, Neda Mohammad Nadeem (pictured), issued a letter to all government and private universities ordering for the change to be made
Before the world's superpowers intervened in Afghanistan, the country enjoyed a brief period of constitutional monarchy during the reign of King Mohammad Zahir Shah.
The king ratified the constitution a year after coming to power in 1963, ushering in nearly a decade of parliamentary democracy before he was overthrown in 1973.
The 1964 constitution gave women the right to vote for the first time and opened the doors for their increased role in politics.
Now, devout Muslim leaders have shoved women back into the kitchens to be slaves and sex-slaves for their male masters, otherwise to be unseen in their cloaks of invisibility. Do Muslim men hate women? Are they afraid of women? Are they watching what's happening in Iran and are taking preventive measures?
All girls should leave Afghanistan as soon as possible and see what kind of reaction that brings. Women's equality groups should be working to bring that about.
Islamic Republic of Iran arrested famous actress after she said
execution of protester was ‘disgrace to humanity’
DEC 19, 2022 1:00 PM
BY ROBERT SPENCER
Jihad Watch
“Make ready for them all that you can of force and of warhorses, so that by them you may strike terror in the enemy of Allah and your enemy…” (Qur’an 8:60)
“Iran Arrests Famous Actress Who Called Execution
‘Disgrace To Humanity,’”
by Brian Bushard, Forbes,
December 17, 2022
Iranian state media IRNA said Alidoosti was detained because she failed to provide “documentation in line with her claims,” one week after she expressed solidarity in an Instagram post with a man executed in recent anti-government protests, multiple outlets reported Saturday.
In the post, she criticized the execution of Shekari, who officials claimed blocked a street and attacked a security official with a machete (charges his family disputes).
It’s the latest high-profile case of the Iranian government’s crackdown on protesters, with Amir Nasr-Azadani, a former professional soccer player, facing a possible death sentence for participating in what Iranian police claim was a group that killed a police colonel (Fifpro, soccer’s player’s union strongly condemned the arrest).
Last week, Iranian officials executed a second person, Majidreza Rahnavard, who authorities claim stabbed members of Iran’s paramilitary group, the Basij Resistance Force, but whose trial was condemned by human rights observes as based on “coerced confessions, after a grossly unfair process”; his body was hung from a crane in an apparent warning to protesters.
Alidoosti, meanwhile, had been using social media as a form of protest, posting a photo of herself on Instagram last month holding a piece of paper that read: “Woman, Life Freedom.”
In the photo, Alidoosti was not wearing a hijab, which are required by law for women in Iran—an act of apparent solidarity with Iranian women who have been protesting for months against the country’s strict moral police.
No comments:
Post a Comment