Muslim men selling their daughters into sex slavery isn’t our fault, it’s Islam’s fault.
Last month, the BBC ran a story about Afghan men selling daughters as young as five years old into the sex slavery known as Islamic marriage. Rather than blaming the Koran and the example set by Islam’s pedophile founder Mohammed who married his most prominent ‘wife’ Aisha at the tender age of seven, the radical state media outlet instead blamed the Trump administration.
The BBC complained that “the US – once the top donor to Afghanistan – cut nearly all aid to the country last year” without explaining that the aid was cut because the money was going through the UN to the Taliban which is once again hosting Al Qaeda and aiding Islamic terrorists.
Selling girls into sex slavery was a common practice in Afghanistan specifically and Islam in general not only before the U.S. invasion after 9/11, but before the existence of the U.S. These are cultural behaviors in Islamic and Afghan culture that the media is too terrified to criticize.
The media knows better because it’s been covering stories about Afghans selling little girls into sex slavery going back decades. There were stories about the sale of three-olds into sex slavery in 2021, before the end of U.S. aid, the sale of 8-year-olds back in 2007, and 10-year-olds in 2003.
An NBC News story from 2007 headlined “Afghan girls traded like currency to settle debts”, described how a man sold his daughter in exchange for 9 sheep, another in which a taxi driver who hit and killed a boy bought an 11-year-old girl and gave her in exchange to the dead boy’s relatives, and the girl was then killed, none of which had to do with U.S. foreign aid.
The NBC story quoted the Afghan government stating that “roughly two out of five Afghan marriages are forced” and an NGO that “investigated about 500 cases of girls given in marriage to settle blood feuds.” That’s not about Afghanistan’s regular fake ‘famines’ or about foreign aid.
Girls are being sold and traded because they’re considered property in Islam. It’s why the UN estimates that 90% of Afghan women and girls have experienced domestic violence.
More recently in Israel, the Associated Press, ran a story about Muslims in Gaza selling their daughters into the Islamic institution of sex slavery that they call marriage, describing the sale and rape of a 14-year-old girl with the assistance of her new husband’s family.
“Eventually, his mother ‘tied up my hands above my head,’ the daughter said. The husband then raped her. After that, he repeatedly threatened to bring his mother to tie her up if she screamed, she said. She recounted repeated instances of rape and said on one occasion, she had to be taken to the hospital with bleeding.”
The AP, which had known ties to Hamas, in a new low, illustrated this story with imaginary drawings of the supposed suffering in Gaza and blamed the situation on Israel, but child marriage increased early on after the Hamas takeover because it was considered more Islamic.
The AP blames Israel for the traditional Islamic sale of daughters in Gaza, featuring a quote claiming that “at times of widespread displacement in conflicts with Israel, some Palestinians have seen marriage as a way to bring stability for their daughters.” The AP queried the Supreme Sharia Court in Gaza which stated that “20.6% of the 35,474 marriages recorded in 2024 and 2025 involved a girl under 18, including 627 marriages of girls under 15.” That number was at 21% in 2017 when there was no significant conflict. And it’s always been higher in Gaza in part because there hasn’t been much in the way of a Christian population to balance out Islam.
The official statistics coming out of Hamas are likely fictional anyway. In the previous decade, nearly a quarter of girls in Gaza had a live birth before they had turned 18 years old. Since out-of-wedlock births result in honor killings, these would be births within marriages.
Much as Islamic child rape in Afghanistan was blamed on the U.S., the UN and the AP blame the sale of girls into sex slavery in Gaza on Israel. But, as in Afghanistan, if the sale of girls is supposedly happening due to the Oct 7 war, why did it also predate the war?
And, if as the AP claims, this is the work of loving parents who just can’t provide for their families, why did the UN report in 2019 that 38% of women in Gaza surveyed described domestic abuse by their husbands? And why did it report that under Hamas, “the prevalence of violence against women by their husbands is significantly higher in the Gaza Strip than in the West Bank?” Is Israel making Muslim men in Gaza beat their wives at higher rates?
Domestic abuse, like child sex slavery, is sanctioned by Islam. And Hamas, apart from promising to destroy Israel and kill all the Jews, is a Muslim Brotherhood organization whose mission is imposing Islamic Sharia law.
In Egypt, which ruled Gaza until 1967, and where much of Gaza’s Arab Muslim colonist population came from as shown by the prevalence of last names like ‘Al-Masri’ or ‘Egyptian’ in Gaza, the underage marriage rate is 17%. But, much more relevantly, in the parts of Egypt in the Sinai that are closest to Gaza, the numbers are far higher.
In Egypt’s Rafah, the main crossing between Egypt and Gaza, 7 out of 10 marriages involved a minor, while in North Sinai, it’s 1 out of 3 marriages.
None of this has anything to do with Israel or the Oct 7 war.
The numbers are likely similar in Gaza when accounting for the large number of unregistered marriages. The media is once again playing statistical bait and switch in Gaza, comparing registered marriages before the war with unregistered marriages after the war, but most underage marriages were always unregistered because it allowed the PLO and Hamas, and the Western NGOs which funnel money to them, to pretend that child marriage rates were improving.
The only thing that has ever improved these numbers is westernization and once the Hamas takeover happened, Gaza went down the same path as Afghanistan, breeding generations of ‘soldiers’ tasked with the mission of conquering and eliminating non-Muslim minorities.
Child marriage rates are high because girls are seen as property and breeding machines for the war. Yasser Arafat, the leader of the PLO, bragged that, “the womb of the Arab woman is my strongest weapon.” The Egyptian Islamic terrorist didn’t of course mean his actual wife or single daughter, who lived in luxury in Paris with billions in stolen foreign aid, but the ‘fellaheen’, the peasant who is expected to breed sons as cannon fodder and daughters as breeding fodder.
These aren’t new innovations, but standard Islamic practices that explain its worldwide spread.
Blaming America and Israel for the tribal feudal nature of Islam, its abuse of women and its hunger for conquest, is a matter of blaming the victims for the outrages of their oppressors.
Muslim men in Afghanistan and Gaza sell their daughters because they’re means to an end. And that ‘end’ is the conquest and subjugation of the rest of the world commanded by Islam.
Raping children is just how more child soldiers are made to conquer the children of the world.
Women are so devalued and despised that boys are often considered preferable sexual partners. “Men are for pleasure,” goes the saying, “and women are for babies.” As long as a man marries and has children, he can carry on with boys is not considered a homosexual, and is not liable to be executed as such.
“Those are the ones brought near in the Gardens of Pleasure, a company of the former peoples and a few of the later peoples, on thrones woven, reclining on them, facing each other. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal with vessels, pitchers and a cup from a flowing spring.” — Qur’an 56:11-18
“And they will be given to drink a cup whose mixture is of ginger, a fountain within Paradise named Salsabeel. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. And when you look there, you will see pleasure and great dominion.” — Qur’an 76:17-20
The children forced into ‘Bacha Bazi’ sexual servitude by the Taliban: The group has decriminalized marrying girls… but their commanders are guilty of equally depraved abuse towards boys
by Eliana Silver, Daily Mail, May 30, 2026:
Adorned in makeup and dressed in brightly coloured women’s clothing, young boys are paraded before groups of powerful men to dance, before being subjected to rape.
For thousands of impoverished children in Afghanistan, this systemic sexual exploitation is the harrowing reality of Bacha Bazi.
The barbaric tradition, whose name translates to ‘boy play’, has persisted for centuries, turning boys into sex slaves for the country’s elite.
While Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers publicly claim to oppose the practice, Bacha Bazi continues as an open secret.
Survivors who have escaped speak of beatings, rape and psychological torment, only to be cast aside once they grow facial hair and are no longer considered desirable.
Many turn to prostitution, drug addiction or suicide, unable to escape the trauma they have endured.
Others face further violence upon returning home, while the suspension of much international aid following the Taliban’s return to power in 2021 has left victims with limited access to support and rehabilitation.
All this takes place in a country where homosexuality can carry the death penalty and pederasty is supposedly punishable by lengthy prison sentences.
Despite the Taliban’s legal ban on the practice, a recent report suggests it remains widespread.
The US State Department in its latest Trafficking in Persons report, found that child soldier recruitment, human trafficking and Bacha Bazi continue in Afghanistan.
The report said the Taliban recruit children through coercion and deception, including false promises, and documented cases of Bacha Bazi involving Taliban officials as well as other armed groups. …
The horror of the situation was laid bare when Dan Quinn, a former US Special Forces captain, was relieved of his command and pulled from Afghanistan for attacking an American-backed Afghan militia commander who had kept a boy chained to his bed as a sex slave.
‘The reason we were here is because we heard the terrible things the Taliban were doing to people, how they were taking away human rights,’ Quinn later said.
‘But we were putting people into power who would do things that were worse than the Taliban.’…
Sin is progressive, like Islamic law taken to its ultimate conclusion.
There are Westerners, some of them quite respected and influential, who will see this news item somewhere (not here, of course) and assume that the Taliban are misunderstanding Islam, which they are certain is a religion of peace and tolerance that rejects violence and slavery. If you show such people the justifications in the Qur’an and Sunnah for slavery and violence, they will wave them away with a reference to there being a multitude of interpretations of such passages, although they will not bring forth any quotation or other evidence of an interpretation of Islam that rejects slavery and violence. Or else they will say that the Bible is full of terrible passages as well, despite the fact that no one today is pointing to the Bible to justify violence or slavery. They will point to sinister and deceptive “moderate Muslims” who have no following among Muslims as if they were evidence of an Islamic mainstream that rejects all this. As The Man With No Eyes once said, some men (and women) you just can’t reach.
“The Taliban’s penal code also explicitly recognises slavery, using the term ghulam (slave) in several articles.” The term ghulam (plural, ghilman) appears in the Qur’an: “And there go around them, waiting on them, servant boys [ghilmanun] of their own, as if they were hidden pearls.” (52:24) This is one basis for the Afghan practice of bacha bazi, the sexual enslavement of young boys. Many in Afghanistan will see the new penal code’s use of the term as legitimizing that practice.
Afghan Resistance Group Condemns Taliban Penal Code As Medieval
January 23, 2026:
The Supreme Council of National Resistance for the Salvation of Afghanistan says the Taliban’s newly approved penal code would push the country into conditions “far worse than the Middle Ages”.
In a statement released on Friday, the council said the move was deliberate and aimed at “distorting the image of Islam in the eyes of global public opinion”.
The opposition body said the penal code governing Taliban-run courts “openly violates human dignity and religious and sectarian equality”, warning that several of its provisions institutionalise discrimination and abuse.
Referring to the contents of the code, the council said the Taliban have imposed explicit religious discrimination by recognising followers of only one sect as Muslims and branding adherents of other sects as heretics.
It added that the code divides society in what it described as a primitive and medieval manner, “effectively legitimising slavery, defining women as concubines and husbands as masters and owners of women, and imposing a range of degrading and inhumane punishments on society”….
According to a document obtained by Afghanistan International, Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada has endorsed the penal code, which contains 119 articles.
The code grants judicial institutions the authority to sentence opponents and critics to death. Under Article 4, Clause 6, citizens are even permitted to personally punish individuals if they witness what is described as a “sin” being committed.
The Taliban’s penal code also explicitly recognises slavery, using the term ghulam (slave) in several articles.
====================
Human Rights Report: Taliban Approves Judicial Law Legalizing Slavery, Violence Against Children
Shia Waves, January 24, 2026:
A new report issued by the human rights organization Al-Tasamuh states that the Taliban, through the adoption of new judicial principles, have not only formalized slavery but also permitted physical violence against children while ignoring restrictions on other forms of repression.
According to the report, the law—comprising 119 articles and signed by Taliban leader Hibatullah Akhundzada—defines only limited forms of prohibited violence, such as bone fractures or skin lacerations. Beating, psychological humiliation, and sexual abuse are not criminalized in the absence of such injuries.
Article 48 of the law allows for the punishment of children aged ten and above on religious grounds. The legislation also entrenches a system of slavery through repeated references to the term “slave” in multiple provisions, in violation of international law and human rights conventions. The law further authorizes the killing of “rebels,” a category that includes activists and political opponents, and enables arbitrary violence against individuals accused of committing “sins.”
The report notes that the law classifies citizens into four social classes, with penalties varying according to social status. It draws clear distinctions between religious scholars, nobles, and lower classes, undermining the principle of equality before the law.
Religiously, the law applies exclusively to followers of the Hanafi school of jurisprudence, criminalizing any deviation from it. It also bans cultural practices such as dancing without providing clear definitions, opening the door to arbitrary arrests….
It’s hard to imagine that any woman in Kandahar would at this point even contemplate venturing out unveiled.
Taliban warn Kandahar shopkeepers not to sell to unveiled women: Sources
by Ahmad Azizi, Amu, August 9, 2025 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Taliban authorities in Kandahar have warned shopkeepers that they could face imprisonment if they sell goods to women who do not wear Taliban-approved hijab, local sources told Amu.
The order, delivered verbally last week by officials from the Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, applies particularly to merchants in the modern markets of the Aino Mina neighborhood. Shopkeepers were instructed either to refuse service to women entirely or to sell only to those wearing what the Taliban deem proper attire.
Several vendors said the restriction has hurt their businesses, as many female customers now avoid the markets out of fear of harassment or punishment. “Women no longer dare to come shopping,” one shopkeeper said. “The market has lost its bustle.”…
