Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!

3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Give Thanks. There is more to this prayer here

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Showing posts with label hospitals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hospitals. Show all posts

Monday, 24 June 2024

Approaching Sodom > FBI and American Justice goes after whistleblowers after outing gender-affirming care madness

 

Brave nurse tells The Post why she blew the whistle on 

Texas children’s hospital accused of manipulating parents 

into giving kids life-changing trans treatments



HOUSTON, Texas — A nurse at the nation’s largest children’s hospital says doctors pressured parents to give their kids hormone therapy and other transgender medical interventions — warning that the children might kill themselves if they held off on treatments.

Vanessa Sivadge has worked at a Texas Children’s Hospital clinic where kids are given gender-affirming care since 2021. She said doctors there were more driven by “ideology” than what was best for the youths, many of whom had additional underlying problems.

“Parents were manipulated by doctors with an ideological agenda to go down this path of medical transition for their child,” Sivadge told The Post in an exclusive interview.

Vanessa Sivadge has worked at a Texas Children’s Hospital clinic where kids are given gender-affirming care since 2021.Vanessa Sivadge

“And I do think that doctors would use manipulative language to suggest that if they didn’t do this, their child would commit suicide or they would harm themselves.”

Sivadge, 31, also alleged that doctors would miscategorize the treatments to justify gender-affirming care. She believes that the doctors are using the strategy to get around a ban by Texas Medicaid on covering hormone treatments for transgender medicine.

However, Sivadge said she does not directly know whether the treatments are being charged to the publicly funded health insurance plan.

The Houston health care worker said she is being hounded by the FBI for speaking out. Agents visited her home after she spoke to conservative journalist Chris Rufo, and suggested she was part of an investigation into violations of HIPAA patient privacy laws.

Sivadge, 31, also alleged that doctors would miscategorize the treatments to justify gender-affirming careVanessa Sivadge

Sivadge, who still works for Texas Children’s Hospital, said she has observed doctors manipulating the parents of young patients into agreeing to the treatment without informing them of the long-term side effects like infertility.

“The doctor would do things based on what the patient wanted, and not what was medically best for them,” she said.

“There was just no discussion of what are the risks, what are the long-term effects.”

Sivadge also saw that many patients had underlying issues, including past suicide attempts, autism diagnoses, depression and anxiety. She felt these issues were being dismissed in the name of prescribing hormones and other forms of transgender care.

“Many of them had previous ER visits for attempted suicide, many of them are autistic, many of them are depressed and anxious, and that’s really devastating because it’s really clear there’s something else going on in addition to having confusion about their sexual identity,” she said.

“That just really devastated me.”

“The doctor would do things based on what the patient wanted, and not what was medically best for them,” she said.Vanessa Sivadge

She said she observed doctors in the clinic misdiagnosing patients with hormone deficiencies in order to get Medicaid coverage.

“Providers … were misdiagnosing patients intentionally for the purpose of justifying puberty blockers and hormones,” she said.

Among the strategies was making “ludicrous” claims that healthy girls had a testosterone deficiency, or healthy boys had an estrogen deficiency, she alleged.

The normal diagnosis would be gender dysphoria for kids who were deemed to need gender-affirming care, she explained. However, doctors were instead using the alternate diagnosis.

She believes this is part of an effort to allow them to get treatments covered through the taxpayer-funded health insurance program, she claimed.

Texas Children’s Hospital said in March 2022 that it would stop gender-affirming hormone treatments for kids after Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton declared such treatments “child abuse” under state law.

Approaching Sodom > USA's largest Children's Hospital halts use of puberty blockers on children; England's only child and youth gender clinic halts use of puberty blockers

In June 2023, the state legislature passed a law banning trans treatments for kids, and barring taxpayer funds from going to pay for gender-affirming care. That legislation is the subject of a lawsuit before the Texas Supreme Court.

Sivadge said the clinic would also note which parents expressed reticence about giving gender-affirming care to their children.

“There were the parents that were very affirming of their child’s new sexual identity and there were the parents that were a little more cautious and a little more careful and they had some questions and it was always noted in the chart which parents were cautious and weren’t completely affirming and which ones were,” she claimed.

Sivadge first spoke out publicly against transgender medicine for children in 2022, when she wrote for the conservative Family Research Council that she believes the treatment inflicts long-term harm on young patients.

A doctor and a nurse from Texas Children’s Hospital have come forward to blow the whistle on the hospital’s transgender treatments of minors.google

But she came forward in May 2023 to make specific allegations against Texas Children’s Hospital after another whistleblower, Dr. Eithan Haim — a surgeon who completed his residency at the hospital — leaked documents to Rufo in 2023 that purported to show the institution was conducting gender-affirming surgeries on kids in secret and against the law.

Haim has since been charged by the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas with four counts of violating HIPAA privacy laws.

“Dr. Haim did not break the law, and he looks forward to his day in court,” Ryan Patrick, an attorney for Haim, told the Dallas Morning News.

After that interview, on July 24, 2023, the FBI showed up at Sivadge’s door. She said the visit was meant to intimidate her into silence.

It's astonishing how the FBI and The American Justice system have become so ideologically driven and so easily believe the lies of wokism. The trans industry claim that children without gender affirmation care are more likely to suicide, when in reality, children who trans are far more likely to suicide than those who don't. 

Female to Male Adolescent Transgenders have 150 times the normal attempted suicide rate

Sivadge believes this is part of an effort to get the treatments covered through the taxpayer-funded health insurance program.Vanessa Sivadge

Sivadge and her husband were entertaining friends for dinner that night. But when the two men at the door identified themselves, Sivadge knew exactly why they were there.

For 15 minutes, the agents lingered inside Sivadge’s home. She said they threatened her in the hopes she’d help them track down Haim, she said.

“They said, ‘We’re here because we’re aware of your views on transgender medicine,'” Sivadge said of her interaction with the FBI.

“They continued to talk and say, ‘You’re a person of interest in an investigation of someone who has released patient confidential information, violating HIPAA'”

The agents said Sivadge wouldn’t be safe at work if she didn’t help them, she said.

“They said, ‘We would like your help in finding him’ and ‘We would like you to help us expose him’ and ‘If you don’t do that, we will make your life very difficult.'”

When Sivadge referred to Haim as a whistleblower, the FBI agents corrected her, saying he was “not a whistleblower, he’s a leaker,” she said.

“They used very veiled language, like kind of threats, to suggest that if I did not help them, they could not protect me.”

“We just listened and they left and we knew from that moment on that our lives would never be the same and that we would not be silent.”

The FBI said it does not comment on interactions it has with individuals.

Paxton has launched an investigation into both whistleblowers’ claims. Additionally, Texas state Rep. Brian Harrison (R-Midlothian) has called for the state legislature to hold hearings to investigate the issue and the Biden administration’s “unconstitutional tyranny.”

They should also investigate the tyranny of the FBI in these cases.

“The Biden administration, their goal here is to stifle dissent. They want to silence opposition,” Harrison recently told The Post.

A spokesperson for Texas Children’s Hospital didn’t respond to The Post when reached for comment.

Sivadge said her goal in speaking out is to advocate for the kids who are being given life-altering treatments by providers who are putting political correctness ahead of medicine.

“These doctors are driven by a political agenda, like an ideological agenda,” she said, “and I truly believe that they think that they’re doing the right thing.”



Monday, 25 July 2016

Lawyers for Jimmy Savile's Victims Win Big Settlement for Themselves

Lawyers 'get £2.5mn of Jimmy Savile's estate leaving just £1mn for the paedophile DJ's victims' 
By EKIN KARASIN FOR MAILONLINE

Law firm Osborne Clarke claimed costs of £1.8million for its work for NatWest bank (pictured) and the running of the compensation scheme, while lawyers working for the claimants will be paid £689,000, according to court documents
Law firm Osborne Clarke claimed costs of £1.8million for its work for NatWest bank and the running of the compensation scheme, while lawyers for the claimants will be paid £689,000, according to court papers.

A payout of just over one million has been agreed for the 78 cases of abuse made solely against the estate, meaning each victim gets an average of £13,000.

And each lawyer will get, what, 10 or 20 times that? Lawyers should be limited in what percentage of a settlement they can take. The victims must feel like they've been raped again.

Child abuse survivors' representatives and a Labour MP criticised the legal fees, calling for judges to speak out against lawyer's charges.

NatWest bank applied to be allowed to make the payments to the claimants and their lawyers under the compensation scheme at the High Court in London on Thursday. They then applied to be relieved of their role of executor.  

Mark Cunningham, QC, appearing for NatWest, told Mr Justice Warren that the estate was currently worth £2,042,000 - with £1,033,000 to be paid to claimants and £689,000 to their representatives. - That's after Osborne Clarke are done with it!

Due to other costs, the amount left would be around £141,000 - which will be divided among defendants such as the BBC, the NHS and Barnardo's, which had already paid out damages. 

It emerged after the Jimmy Savile's death that the paedophile broadcaster had assaulted hundreds of children.

Savile had an estate reported to be worth around £4million when he died in 2001 aged 84 without ever facing prosecution.

Savile sexually assaulted victims as young as five at NHS hospitals during decades of unrestricted access, reports say.

He abused 63 people, who were aged between eight to 40, connected to Stoke Mandeville Hospital from 1968 to 1992, according to the Stoke Mandeville report.

Claimants and their solicitors can expect their payments next week after a written judgement, though Justice Warren has said he will grant the application.

Peter Saunders, founder of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, told the Sunday Times: 'Arguably the only people who really win in these situations are the lawyers - they take the lion's share of the money in estates such as Savile's.'

John Mann, the Labour MP who has campaigned against child sex abuse, called the sum an 'absurdly large amount'.

Liz Dux, specialist abuse lawyer at Slater and Gordon who represented 168 of Savile's victims, said: 'What has been most important in all of this was that those Savile victims whose claims have been accepted, will receive their compensation in full. There will be no deductions. 

Except for the deductions of your charges and Osborne Clarke's made up front.

'All parties including the Savile Estate wanted this matter concluded as quickly and cheaply as possible but the actions of the Savile Trust, who were the beneficiaries under his will, have been to constantly try to block the victims receiving a penny in compensation.'

'Sadly, it has been the actions of the beneficiaries of the Estate which has led to the escalation of costs due their continued opposition of the settlement scheme.'

'Fortunately, the Courts have defeated their efforts. Justice has prevailed and those who Savile abused can now hopefully achieve closure.'

A payout of just over one million has been agreed for the 78 cases of abuse made solely against Saville's estate, meaning each victim gets an average of £13,000Savile had an estate reported to be worth aroudn £4million when he died in 2001 aged 84 without ever facing prosecution
A payout of just over one million has been agreed for the 78 cases of abuse made solely against Saville's estate, meaning each victim gets an average of £13,000

A spokesman for the Trust said: 'It is simply not accurate to claim that the Trustees of the Jimmy Savile Trust have tried to block payments to victims of sexual abuse. 

'Rather, we objected to a scheme which, when presented to both the High Court and Court of Appeal, required amendment.

'The Court of Appeal confirmed that it was necessary to hear from all parties, including the Trust. One of the reasons we took issue with the scheme was the size of the payments to the lawyers, which in our view were too high. 

'We have felt all along that it cannot be right for the lawyers to get more than the claimants.'

Osborne Clarke's costs for Thursday's two-hour High Court hearing were said to be £61,000, however a spokeswoman for the firm said the sum did not represent costs for the hearing.

They claimed the firm's fees 'comprised less than half the figure' and were not just for the two-hour hearing, but for the necessary work taken to make the application.

They added that under the scheme, 166 claimants will be receiving £2,306,636 - a figure covering claims against the estate, NHS, BBC, Barnardo's and mental health charity MIND - not those solely against the estate.

The law firm said: 'The £1.8million figure is inaccurate as taken out of context, and does not represent only Osborne Clarke fees, which are only a proportion of the overall figure.' The overall sum included third-party costs.