It's hard to believe that European countries are still hiding the dangers of Muslim migrants to European girls. The rape ratios around the continent are staggeringly high for Muslims compared to indigenous Europeans. Yet, governments, media, and even the police hide those facts from the public leaving young European girls and women completely unaware of the many dangers they face. There is blood on the hands of governments, media and the judiciary that will some day be accounted for. It's hard to believe how stupid some people can be.
Father Of Rape Victim Decries French State’s Silence
In France there have been a series of unusually violent rapes of French girls and women by Muslim migrants. 70% of all rapes in France are committed by Muslims. Now a father of one of those victims, who has just awakened from a month-long induced coma, has spoken out about the failure of the French state to adequately protect its citizens from these criminals. More on this case, and the father’s hope to raise awareness of the dangers that are not being dealt with, can be found here:
‘Sexual predators and other parasites’ – Father slams French government’s
silence after brutal rape of his daughter that left her in a coma
by John Cody, Remix News, September 7, 2023:
In a case that has made national headlines in France due to the level of brutality, 29-year-old Mégane has now awoken after being raped into a coma with a broomstick by Oumar Ndiaye, who has been dubbed “the monster of Cherbourg” by politician Damien Rieu.
The 29-year-old woman has been in an artificial coma for over a month since the attack on Aug. 4; however, her health still remains “fragile,” according to relatives.
The attack is being described as an “act of torture” by French news outlet Le Figaro, in which the 18-year-old Ndiaye allegedly broke into Mégane’s apartment and began to rape her with a 29-inch-long broomstick, perforating her colon and causing injuries that nearly killed her and left hospital staff treating the woman in tears. Police sources say Mégane had reportedly seen the suspect before but had no interaction with him prior to the rape….
Ludovic [her father] is now trying to raise awareness about the French government and its lack of response to the brutal crime, as well as to the fact that the man who allegedly tortured his daughter into a coma had a long criminal record but remained free to attack again.
“The government) not communicating about this attack gives credit [helps] to all these sexual predators and other parasites of society who plague the streets. A wake-up call to the government about the fact that we leave this kind of individual, with a heavy criminal past, in complete freedom, would be welcome. ‘Trust in justice,’ we were told… We only want that,” he said.
As Remix News previously reported, the 18-year-old suspect has a long and violent criminal record consisting of 17 offenses involving physical assault, theft, and the incestuous sexual assault of his younger sister….
The government has so far remained silent about the particularly brutal attack on Mégane, no doubt not wanting to draw attention to the epidemic of Muslim rapists, a silence Mégane’s father deplores. He also wants answers: how is it that Oumar Ndiaye, with his long criminal record of 17 offenses — assault, theft, and sexual assault of his sister — was nonetheless allowed to walk the streets? Whatever happened to juvenile detention? It sounds as if, despite those 17 offenses, he has never been imprisoned. Why not? Clearly there is something wrong with a criminal justice system that permits someone like Ndiaye to remain free. The father wants — demands — an explanation from the state.
“The suspect was arrested a week later, with his fingerprints matching those found in the victim’s apartment, and the suspect’s geolocation on his phone also showed that he was in her apartment during the attack. A police source said he had just left a nightclub shortly before the attack in the early morning, with the club located just a few dozen meters from the victim’s residence.
According to Le Figaro, the suspect expressed “neither empathy nor remorse” for the crime while in police custody. Ndiaye has already been convicted five times in the juvenile court system for offenses against property and violence.
Apparently, because Ndiaye was a juvenile — under 18 — at the time, those five convictions did not lead to incarceration. The law clearly needs to be changed, perhaps by lowering the age defined as “juvenile” to “under 16.”
The courts also knew his predilection for committing sexual crimes.
A procedure for the rape of a minor initiated in 2019 was dismissed by the prosecution in 2020, on the grounds that the offense was not sufficiently characterized. And a sexual assault procedure against his sister is currently under investigation, without it being possible at this stage to determine whether or not these facts have been established,” the Coutances prosecution wrote in a statement….
I have no idea what it means to declare an offense as “not sufficiently characterized” — something was undoubtedly lost in translation — or why the prosecution decided in that 2019 case to dismiss the charges against him. Oumar Ndiaye has clearly been getting away with a great deal; little wonder he thought that he might not be imprisoned for this, his latest barbaric assault, on Mégane.
“I dream of a France where a young woman is not in danger of ending up in a coma after being robbed, raped and horribly tortured by Oumar, a repeat offender, in her own home,” wrote former presidential candidate Éric Zemmour.
Zemmour’s remarks were seized upon by left-wing Olivier Faure, the secretary general of the Socialist Party, who insisted that the right-wing politician was being racist by suggesting that it is immigrants who are rapists. He added that it did not matter whether the perpetrator’s name was “Oumar, Francis, Michel, Emile, Guy, or Patrice,” and that it was a heinous act nonetheless.
But the rapist is a Muslim. And his name is Oumar. That’s why Zemmour had every right to call him “Oumar.” What’s more, 70% of convicted rapists in France are Muslims. Why shouldn’t Zemmour have mentioned his name and drawn attention to his Muslim identity? And of course it does matter, despite Olivier Faure’s assertion, whether the rapist was a native Frenchman or a Muslim migrant, because given that such a high percentage of rapists are Muslim migrants, the French, if properly alerted to the problem, can put a stop to Muslim migration — by voting in such people as Zemmour — and thereby decrease drastically the number of rapes. But the public first needs to know the truth about who is committing the violent crimes of rape and murder, which the French state is attempting to hide.
Other rape cases include the rape and murder of 12-year-old Lola in Paris. by two Algerians. Her throat was slashed and her body stuffed in a suitcase. The Algerians were both under a deportation order, that they had ignored; only 0.2% of Algerians who have been ordered to leave France have done so. The French state refuses to hire enough investigators and police to track down those flouting deportation orders, Algerians and others, and to forcibly put them on flights back to their countries of origin.
Here is what Mégane’s father, Ludovic, wants the French state to do. First, it must investigate how it was that Oumar Ndiaye, with 17 offenses on his record, including physical assault and theft, managed to stay out of prison. What laws need to be changed to ensure that such outrages are not repeated? Second, the French government needs to release to the public the data it possesses, but refuses to release, on Muslim criminality, so that the French, better informed, can decide for themselves which immigration policies they wish to keep, and which they will want to discontinue.
=====================================================================
Convicted rapist dragged woman, 66, into bushes
and tried to rape her while he was due to be sent
home to Uganda after previous attack on 21-year-old
by Ryan Prosser, Daily Mail, September 8, 2023
A migrant from Uganda has been handed a life sentence for brutally beating and raping a pensioner in London, despite previously losing his right to remain in the country after a 2008 rape.
The attack came despite the Ugandan-born migrant previously losing his right to remain in Britain after raping a 21-year-old woman while she was on her way home after a night out in central London in 2008.
After serving a little over ten years in prison, Mukalazi was released on licence in September 2018. However, he was later recalled to prison in 2019 for demonstrating “risky behaviour” towards women at a nightclub the following year. Yet, he was later transferred to an immigration detention centre before being released on immigration bail in 2021.
Despite his first rape conviction revoking his right to remain in the country and a judge recommending that he be deported, the Ugandan migrant was free to roam the streets of London and once again sexually preyed upon a woman last year……
UK: Muslim father urged to flee country to avoid being
‘mistreated for being Muslim’ after killing his daughter
Last month, Jihad Watch covered the tragic murder of 10-year-old Sara Sharif. She was murdered by her own family members. Honor murder is justified in Islamic law:
“Retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (Reliance of the Traveller o1.1-2).
In other words, Sara’s murder is permissible from the standpoint of a classic manual of Islamic law.
It has now emerged that “the runaway father and stepmother of Sara Sharif were urged by a British solicitor to flee the country after the schoolgirl’s death.” This was according to Malik Asif Taufique, the Sharif family lawyer in Pakistan. The family quickly left for Pakistan. Why were they urged to flee? Because, according to Taufique, “they would be mistreated for being Muslims and a big scandal will be made against their faith.’”
No, they wouldn’t be “mistreated as Muslims.” They would have been treated as what they were: accused murderers. They would have been processed in the system as anyone in Britain would be. And yes, their actions as Muslims would be scrutinized outside the legal system, because of the harm they caused, and because they may have felt justified by their religion to murder their own child. Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide.
Yet the “scandal made against their faith,” in the view of adherent Muslims, is the worse crime of all.
The British lawyer who was behind their flight to Pakistan was called their “friend,” and his name was not given.
The culprits in the case are again made out to be victims, as the article goes on to explain how terrified they were of being “harshly” punished in the British system, and how they feared that they would lose custody of their remaining children.
It isn’t a harsh punishment to lose custody of your other children if you’re found to have killed one of them.
Despite the worst human rights abuses in Islam, Muslim victimhood is entrenched in the minds of far too many Muslims, and the West has bought into it, particularly leftists. Victimhood is as a common means to distract attention from those abuses committed in the name of Islam or sanctioned by its teachings. It also serves as a means to shut down criticism of Islam by branding anyone who dares to engage in such criticism as “Islamophobic.”
No matter what suffering is incurred by the real victims — even murder — the Muslim perpetrator is always the victim.
Sara Sharif’s father and stepmother were ‘urged to flee Britain’
after her death by UK solicitor as they would be
‘mistreated for being Muslims’
by Abul Taher, Daily Mail. September 9, 2023:
The runaway father and stepmother of Sara Sharif were urged by a British solicitor to flee the country after the schoolgirl’s death, the family’s Pakistani lawyer told The Mail on Sunday last night.
Urfan Sharif, 41, his wife Beinash Batool, 29, and his brother, Faisal Malik, 28, fled to Islamabad with the couple’s five children, aged between one and 13, in a ‘terrified’ state on August 9, the lawyer said.
The day after the family left the country, police found ten-year-old Sara’s body at the family’s home in Woking, Surrey, after being alerted by Sharif from Pakistan.
The discovery sparked an international manhunt. Police in Pakistan arrested ten members of Sharif’s extended family in their home town of Jhelum in Punjab, including Urfan Sharif’s father, brothers and cousins.
The fugitive couple released a short video last week where Batool described Sara’s death as an ‘incident’ and said the pair were willing to co-operate with British police.
Last night, Malik Asif Taufique, the Sharif family lawyer in Pakistan, told the MoS that after Sara died, the couple spoke to a British lawyer friend in a panic. The friend, who has not been identified, apparently ‘terrified’ the couple.
‘Urfan and Beinash ran from the UK because a British lawyer there made them terrified, saying they would have a harsh punishment in the UK and they would lose custody of their children,’ said Mr Taufique. ‘They would be mistreated for being Muslims and a big scandal will be made against their faith.’..
Being a Muslim here means having the right to murder your daughter for the least little suspicion of non-Islamic behaviour.
=====================================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment