In a country where Sharia is Law, this man would have gotten away with murdering his wife.
UK: Muslim Husband Punishes (Murders) His Wife
Islam is a misogynistic religion. A Muslim woman’s testimony in court is worth one-half that of a man. A daughter customarily inherits half that of a son. A Muslim husband can divorce his wife merely by reciting the triple talaq, but a wife can divorce her husband only by going through a complicated legal rigmarole. A woman can claim rape only if there are four male witnesses to the crime, which in practice means that such a claim can practically never be upheld. The Qur’an gives (4:34) a Muslim husband license to “beat his wife” if he even suspects her of disobedience. A Muslim migrant from Bangladesh, now living in Bradford, England, who found his wife “disobedient” for leaving him — he was abusive — and going to live in a women’s shelter, decided that her “disobedience” needed to be punished. So he tracked down where she was staying, watched her every move, and when she was out wheeling their seven-month-old baby son in a pram, he punished her “disobedience” by stabbing he to death. More on this Muslim migrant horror tale, which took place some time ago and that you may have missed, can be found here:
Man found guilty of murdering wife after stabbing her to death while she pushed their baby in pram
by George Bunn, GB News, June 27, 2025:
A “violent, jealous, controlling” husband who stabbed his wife to death as she pushed their baby in a pram after tracking her to a women’s refuge has been found guilty of murder.
Habibur Masum launched a “ferocious” knife attack in broad daylight on Kulsuma Akter before leaving her “bleeding to death in the gutter” and calmly walking away, leaving their seven-month-old son behind.
A court heard Masum, 26, followed Akter, 27, to a refuge in Bradford where she had been staying to escape him after he held a knife to her throat following an assault at their home in Greater Manchester.
After finding her through her phone location, Masum was seen on CCTV in the days leading up to the fatal attack “loitering, watching and waiting” in streets around the hostel, jurors heard.
He sent her messages threatening to kill her family members if she did not return to him, before trying to lure her out by sending her fake messages from a local GP practice pretending their son had an appointment and warning of “increasingly dire consequences” if she did not attend.
Bradford Crown Court heard Akter eventually felt safe enough to leave the refuge on April 6 last year after Masum updated his Facebook page, falsely claiming to be in Spain.
As she was walking in the city centre with a friend, pushing her baby in a pram, Masum confronted her, the trial heard.
He was seen on CCTV trying to steer Akter and the pram away before pulling a knife from his jacket and launching the “brutal attack” when he realised she was not coming with him, prosecutor Stephen Wood KC told jurors.
CCTV footage of the attack, played during the trial, captured Akter’s screams as Masum stabbed her at least 25 times, put her on the ground and kicked her “as a final insult” before lifting her head and deliberately cutting her throat.
No doubt the throat-cutting came naturally to him. How many times must he have slaughtered sheep in similar fashion when living back in Bangladesh?
Wood said the “smiling killer” then calmly walked through Bradford city centre and was seen on CCTV grinning as he got on a bus, “believing at that point he was getting away.”…
No remorse, just satisfaction that he had dealt with his wife according to what Qur’an 4:34 allowed and what he believed was justified in such cases of extreme disobedience. Apparently Masum had no interest in the wellbeing of his child, whom he left on the street in his pram, parked next to his murdered mother.
During the trial, Masum, who gave evidence through a Bengali interpreter, refused to watch footage of the attack but jurors heard that during his first police interview, he requested to see it, with Wood saying he wanted to see what officers “had on him”….
If Masum needed an interpreter at trial, even after living in England for three years, it sounds that he has not bothered to take the free language classes offered to immigrants. He wanted to live in England, to batten on such benefits as the generous British welfare state provides, including free medical care (ob/gyn for his wife), free or subsidized housing, free education including language tuition, unemployment benefits even without a history of employment, family allowances, and more. He did not want to integrate into the larger society of Infidels; he was already overcome with fury that his wife was showing unacceptable signs of independence, “like an Infidel woman.” That was intolerable, for Infidels, he knew from the Qur’an, are “the most vile of created beings” (98:6).
The court heard Akter’s social worker arranged for her to be rehoused and she was due to move on April 8, but in the meantime she heard from Masum’s brother that he was in Spain, and “felt safe to leave the refuge” on the day she was killed….
Masum persuaded his brother to reassure Kulsuma, his estranged wife, that he was in Spain. He never was, but he wanted her to be convinced he was abroad, and thus would conclude it was safe for her to wheel her baby in his pram out in the fresh air.
Masum carried out the murder then calmly walked away as if nothing had happened. He left the scene and made his way out of the city to try and escape justice.
Why shouldn’t Masum have been calm? He had behaved in an Islamicaly correct manner, having warned his wife several times in the past to be “obedient,” and then finally punishing her after she refused to obey him and left home without his permission.
In prison, feeling not at all guilty for what he did, Musem will enjoy the companionship of the “biggest gang” in British prisons today — the gang of Muslims. Perhaps behind bars he will conduct da’wa and persuade some of the unbelievers to convert to Islam, so as to receive the protection offered by his “Muslim bruvvers.” After all, that conversion-out-of-fear is going on in prisons everywhere in the Western world. No political leader in the West has been brave or sensible enough to suggest the obvious solution to this spreading da’wa — segregating Muslim from non-Muslim prisoners, so that the former have no possibility of interacting with the latter. That is, separating the two populations not just in different wings of the same prison, but in different prisons altogether.
No comments:
Post a Comment