Perverted Lives of the Rich and Famous > Rapper "Desiigner" seeks needed help for mental illness

..

Rapper 'Desiigner' charged with indecent exposure for allegedly

masturbating on flight

By David Propper, NYPost

April 24, 2023 7:33pm  Updated

The rapper Desiigner was hit with a federal charge Monday for allegedly masturbating on an international flight and claiming he exposed himself because he “didn’t have [sex] in like a week.”

The 25-year-old rapper, whose real name is Sidney Royel Selby III, was charged with one misdemeanor count of indecent exposure over allegations he exposed himself multiple times starting about 60-90 minutes into a Delta flight from Tokyo to Minneapolis on April 17, a criminal complaint alleges.

After a flight attendant spotted him exposing himself, he quickly covered up only to be caught masturbating about five minutes later by members of the flight crew.

He was again told “no” and covered himself up, the complaint alleges.

Even after he was told he was going to be arrested, Selby was seen exposing himself for a third time, the feds said.

Two travel buddies agreed to watch him the rest of the flight when he was moved to the back of the plane where he apologized to his security guard and claimed he was “bugging” and “messed up.”

When he got up from his first-class seat to move to the back, “a jar of Vaseline dropped in the aisle,” the complaint states.

Desiigner performs at the Huffer x Marvel Launch Event at Culture Kings on April 11, 2019

Getty Images for Huffer

Before he was taken into custody, he also apologized to the flight crew.

When talking to the FBI, he allegedly told an agent he “didn’t get much” in Japan and showed his “magic stick” to one of the flight attendants he found attractive, according to the complaint.

He also said he exposed himself “because I didn’t have anything in like a week,” which the agent understood to mean sex, the complaint states.

When the agent asked if his actions interfered with the flight attendant’s job, he outrageously replied, “I thought I was giving her encouragement, to keep pushing, you know what I mean, to keep striving for it,” the complaint alleges.

He also told the agent he was not under the influence during the flight, the complaint states.

The rapper, known for his hit “Panda,” said on social media Thursday that he was seeking mental health treatment, noting he was “ashamed” of his actions on the flight back to the US without elaborating.

“For the past few months i have not been ok, and i have been struggling to come to terms with what is going on,” Desiigner wrote in a statement posted to his Instagram Story on Thursday.

“While overseas for a concert i performed at, i had to be admitted in to a hospital, i was not thinking clearly. They gave me meds, and i had to hop on a plane home,” he added. “I am ashamed of my actions that happened on that plane. I landed back to the states, and am admitting myself in a facility to help me.”

“I will be canceling all of shows and any obligations until further notice. Mental health is real guys, please pray for me. If you’re not feeling like yourself please get help,” he concluded.

You have to wonder what role drugs had in his developing mental illness?

UK Schools Sexualizing Children as Young as 6 - Teaching Them to Masturbate

Parents shocked as UK schools teach 6-10yo kids to

touch their ‘private parts’ in beds & showers

FILE PHOTO © Jean-Paul Pelissier / Reuters

Parents in Britain are outraged after more than 240 primary schools introduced lessons on “self-stimulation” for children as young as six as part of their sex education program.

A teaching manual, published by the Mail on Sunday, instructs how to teach children aged six to ten about “the rules of self-stimulation.” The lessons are part of the new All About Me program rolled out in more than 240 primary schools in central England’s Warwickshire County. The program, in turn, is designed to be taught in accordance with the compulsory Relationship and Sex Education (RSE), which will be implemented all across the UK next September.

In the section called ‘Touching Myself’, the teachers are advised to tell the youngsters that “lots of people like to tickle or stroke themselves as it might feel nice,” including touching their “private parts.” The children are told that this is “really very normal,” despite the fact that “some people may get cross or say that it is dirty.”

The children are then warned that it is “not polite” to touch themselves in class or other public places, and they should “only” do it when they “are alone, perhaps in the bath or shower or in bed.”

Some parents were shocked by the program, saying that children of such young ages should not be exposed to mature topics like masturbation. “This sexualisation of our children is just totally inappropriate,” Matthew Seymour told the Mail on Sunday.

“They are calling it self-touching and they won’t use the term masturbation, but when you read it that’s exactly what they’re talking about.”

Parents who disagree with this type of sex education took their children from school when it was taught. A number of education experts and teachers criticized the program’s wording for being too vague and not suitable for primary schoolers.

“We never use the word self-stimulation, not in primary school. For us it is not appropriate,” teacher Lynette Smith said.

They are upset at the choice of words, not the fact that teaching 6-10 year olds to masturbate is a form of child sexual abuse.

Even some politicians who support the idea of compulsory sex education are skeptical towards All About Me. Conservative MP David Davies was “furious” over the program.

“These classes go way beyond the guidance the Government is producing and are effectively sexualising very young children,” he said.

Warwickshire County Council, meanwhile, maintains that the lessons simply tell young students how to “distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate touching” and “recognise the difference between public and private behaviours.”

The council’s website says the program helps to develop the skills required for managing “healthy relationships,” builds “self-esteem” and allows the children “to explore personal identity.”

What does masturbation have to do with building relationships? It seems the opposite is true.

One of the program’s authors, education consultant Jonny Hunt, argued that “however uncomfortable adults may find it, children of all ages will self-stimulate from time to time.”

Does that mean we should encourage it, or normalize it? I think the UK Department of Education should be examining the qualities of those who write these abhorrent, child sex curricula. Their motives seem questionable to me, as though they are recruiting people to their lifestyles. 

One of the writers of the sex education program under the Ontario Liberal government was sentenced to 3 years in prison for 3 child sex offenses. The highly educated and qualified Benjamin Levin, 63, was handed a sentence of six months for possession of child porn, 12 months for making child porn and 18 months for counselling to commit child sex abuse. The lesbian Premier, Kathleen Wynne installed the program Levin helped write anyway. Early this year, Wynne was tossed from office and the new Premier cancelled the sex education program immediately.

Elementary children need to be taught what is safe/non-safe touch, who to report it to and how to report it. Beyond that it becomes indoctrination.

Warwickshire, UK

Alberta Government Funds Website Directing K-12 Kids to Sexually Graphic Content

WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT

A few of the less graphic images referred to are displayed below

Is this the type of “help” the Alberta government should be funding for K-12 children?

The content of these articles is graphic. There are images of naked men being flogged and restrained with suggestions on how to use specific BDSM products, including links to purchase those items from an online sex shop. In the article about masturbation, your child is even advised to “pay for porn” and “visit a group masturbation night at your local sex club”.

These sexually graphic articles are examples of the content available on the “Fruit Loop” Facebook page, linked to as a “Community Support” on the Alberta GSA Network website to “help” K-12 children with their Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA).

Unbelievably, it only takes two clicks for K-12 children to easily access sexually graphic material from this website, which is funded with taxpayer money and even recommended by Alberta Education.

The Institute for Sexual Minority Studies and Services (iSMSS) is paid by the Alberta Government to organize the Alberta GSA Network, intended to support a target audience that includes children ages 5 to 17 years old.

Dr. Kristopher Wells, who is a Faculty Director with iSMSS and the “driving force” behind the creation of the Alberta GSA Network, has publicly shared posts from Fruit Loop on his own social media, including a “fast-paced ad” featuring naked young people who “share an erotic kiss on a tennis court” and “are often seen embracing, rolling around on the ground together.”

Clearly he is not ignorant of the sexually graphic content of their posts.

The iSMSS using government funds to provide access to sexually graphic content – especially masquerading under the banner of “support” for K-12 students – is an exploitation of the trust that children, parents and teachers place in our province’s education system.

It is true that sexually graphic content is available on the internet and kids could find it anyway.

However, using schools to intentionally direct and connect children to community organizations that peddle sexually graphic content is not safe or appropriate.

It is dangerous, reckless and wrong.

K-12 children who access GSAs are often already struggling and vulnerable. Exposure to the sexually graphic content made available through the Alberta GSA Network website puts these children at further risk of harm and victimization.

It is obvious the Ministry of Education is trusting the wrong people with the role of supporting 5 to 17-year-olds and creating “safe and caring” schools.

This is not untypical of left-wing governments. Social engineering is cause celebre of NDP and some Liberal governments - Ontario, for instance. Canada's largest province is led by a Liberal gov't with Kathleen Wynne as its Premier. Wynne is gay! As part of her transition team, she had an education adviser, Benjamin Levin, who was well qualified, if not over-qualified, such was his very impressive resume. As Deputy Education Minister, he began to have input into the new 'social engineering education agenda' of the Wynne government and may have been an important part of its implementation but for the fact that he was sent to prison for 3 years for child pornography, and counseling to commit child sex assault. Those who lean 'hard to port' make remarkably poor decisions with regard to our children. 

If this is the “help” iSMSS and Dr. Wells want to provide to Alberta’s kindergarten to Grade 12 students through our school system, then we don’t want it.

As parents and taxpayers of Alberta, we call on the Alberta government to immediately:

1. Suspend all funding to iSMSS.

2. Remove iSMSS and Dr. Wells from any influence over our province’s K-12 education system, including any provision of research, resources, counseling, teacher training and new curriculum development.

In order to ensure that schools are welcoming, caring, safe and respectful learning environments, Albertans must demand a higher standard when it comes to anyone entrusted with the support and care of K-12 children in this province – a much higher standard than the “support” currently being offered by iSMSS.

*************

UPDATES:

(March 14, 1 p.m.) In response to my blog article and this information becoming so public it seems the GSA Network website has now edited their list of community supports over the past hour. If you would like to verify the original list, please see the screen captures available in the GSA Network website supporting documentation (WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT).

The fact remains that iSMSS did not properly vet their links and community supports, which only proves their lack of competence when it comes to being trusted with the safety of our K-12 children.

Links and content so inappropriate for K-12 kids should never have been there in the first place, especially under the guise of “support”. If I hadn’t happened to personally stumble across the content, it would still be there. Why is it up to citizens to vet these government funded and recommended resources? Shouldn’t the Alberta government be hiring people who can do their job without volunteer citizens having to do it for them?

Removing a few links does not solve the problem. iSMSS and Dr. Wells have severely violated the public trust and should not be in a position of influence in our K-12 education system at all.  Alberta children deserve better.

(March 15, 10:30 a.m.) Donna Trimble, Executive Director for Parents for Choice in Education, posted an excellent open letter to our elected representatives entitled “Which Alberta Politicians Will Stand Up for Our Children?!”  Feel free to forward her letter to your MLAs and school board trustees.

***************

Thank you to News Talk 770 with Danielle Smith for interviewing Donna Trimble, Executive Director of Parents for Choice in Education on March 14, 2017 about these concerns:

LISTEN HERE FOR THE INTERVIEW

Andrea Huncar, from the CBC News who wrote an article about this topic (March 15, 2017). It was, of course, critical of the blogger Theresa Ng, and Donna Trimble for their failure to embrace LGBTQ and gender confused policies. 

Masturbating in Public is Now OK in Massachusetts - Supreme Court

Man caught exposing privates on train has lewdness conviction overturned

© Brian Snyder / Reuters

Lawrence Maguire was arrested for stroking his naked penis on the Boston subway six years ago, but the state’s Supreme Judicial Court has overturned his conviction.

Massachusetts’ public decency laws may seem like a relic of Puritan culture, but on Tuesday a Supreme Judicial Court ruling overturned the 2010 conviction of Lawrence Maguire, because prosecutors failed to meet the requirements of the laws. Maguire was arrested on the Boston subway after a Transit Police detective saw Maguire allegedly masturbating in the direction of a group of women.

Maguire was convicted by a Boston Municipal Court after the Transit Police detective testified that he was “disgusted” by Maguire’s handiwork on the Green Line. He also detailed seeing Maguire seeming to point in the direction of three women waiting for an outbound train, but put his penis away and attempted to flee when he noticed the officer.

State public decency laws are surprisingly strict on these matters. While the officer may have been disgusted, no witnesses, including the women who may have witnessed the incident, testified that they were “shocked” or “alarmed” by Maguire’s actions.

The state’s highest court explained, “the detective was the only eyewitness who testified to the defendant's conduct” and that he was disgusted “after viewing the defendant's exposed penis, not for himself, but rather out of ‘concern’ for the women seated on the bench.”

The state’s highest and apparently most literal court continued, “Someone must be personally and ‘in fact’ ‘shocked or alarmed’ by the conduct; it is not sufficient that someone merely might be.”

So, if there had been children on the car and none of them wanted to come forward and testify that they were shocked, there would be no conviction! How stupid is that? The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has just opened the door to all kinds of public displays of vulgarity and obscenity. Unbelievable!

At the time of his arrest in October 2010, Maguire had been awaiting trial for doing the same thing on the Red Line two months before- he was also found not guilty in that case. This would apparently make him an excellent rights activist for masturbating on trains.

Teachers Abuse 100 Times More Than Priests, But We Trust Them with Sex Ed?

Are teachers more trustworthy sex educators than parents? 

TORONTO, ONTARIO - (LifeSiteNews)
Though governments argue that teaching sex ed in schools is about student safety, one leading anti-sex-ed activist recently warned parents that it can actually put kids’ safety at risk. Many parents strongly object to government schools stepping in on such an intimate and personal matter. But is there also good reason for parents to distrust teachers’ motives in the classroom?

“As the sex-ed lessons start to be rolled out in classrooms across Ontario, parents need to critically evaluate the claim, repeatedly made by Premier Kathleen Wynne, that teachers are more trustworthy than parents to give sex education lessons,” Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Coalition told LifeSiteNews.

Fonseca laid out his concerns about teachers providing students with explicit sex-ed in a meeting with concerned parents last September at the Thorncliffe Park Library Community Centre in East York.

“If you read the papers, there are just so many cases of teachers having inappropriate sexual contact with children. How are parents to know which teachers are the sexual predators? I'm not saying that all teachers are sexual predators by any means, but there is a problem in the education industry,” he said.

“If the teacher is attracted to children, won't these explicit [sex-ed] lessons risk arousing the teacher sexually?” he added.

A brief search through the news of sexual assaults by Ontario teachers in 2016 alone brings up disturbing results:

London, On, January 06 – Teacher Roger Reid is charged and arrested for inappropriately touching a female student. 
Stirling, February 15 – Teacher Jaclyn McLaren, 36, is charged and arrested for 36 counts of sexual abuse with children, including sexual assault, sexual touching, and making child pornography. 
Toronto, February 18 – 30-year-old teacher Anthony Cuccione is charged and arrested with five counts of sexual assault after several students came forward to report “inappropriate sexual touching.”
Niagara Falls, March 7 – Teacher Michael J. Molnar faces numerous sex-related charges from incidents involving two female students, including  two counts of sexual assault, sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching, and sexual exploitation.

The sex-ed curriculum has discussions of genitalia and sexual consent in Grade 1, homosexuality and gender theory in Grade 3, masturbation in Grade 6, oral and anal penetration in Grade 7, and making a personal sexual plan by Grade 8. 

Unbelievable! 

An active Catholic teacher in Ontario told LifeSiteNews, under condition of anonymity, that student sexual abuse by teachers is more rampant than parents realize. 

“We get a monthly magazine from the College of Teachers called “Professionally Speaking.” In the magazine there is a section that everyone calls the “Blue Pages” in which are published the reports of teachers who have been disciplined or convicted of various crimes.” 

“Almost every case that is discussed in the Blue Pages is about sexual assault or sexual deviancy. You see cases of female teachers assaulting male students, and sometimes female students. And you see male teachers assaulting female students, and sometimes male students. It’s unbelievable what is in there. It’s disgusting,” the teacher said.

In the March issue alone there were four cases of teachers convicted of being involved sexually with students, included teachers who possessed child pornography, and one male teacher who was convicted for the “sexual touching of four girls.”

“We all turn to it. It’s the first thing teachers go to when the magazine comes in. It’s like the ‘National Enquirer’ of teachers,” the teacher added.

The teacher said that there should be little doubt in the minds of parents that the sex-ed curriculum will become an occasion for more teachers to “act out sexually with students.”