The Justice Joke in the UK and Canada - Heroes of the Truth > Tommy Robinson's Sentencing Appeal; Covid_19 investigator found guilty for doing her job

 

Please pray for Tommy Robinson and Helen Gruhs, two heroes who courageously tried to save lives from the madness the Rape of Britain and the criminal covering up of the many, many deaths caused by untested Covid_19 vaccines.

Robinson is in prison, kept in solitary confinement as if he was the most dangerous criminal in England. Gruhs has just been found guilty of what was probably an act of continuation of her investigation into the deaths of babies after being ordered to stop. It appears she has yet to be sentenced.

Whoever ordered her to stop investigating is the one who should be found guilty. But it's not like the British or Canadian justice systems are the least bit concerned about babies or children; they are so criminal-centric!

Tommy Robinson’s hearing at the UK Court of Appeal was held today. It wasn’t long — just 75 minutes. Tommy himself joined by video link from prison, but he wasn’t allowed to say anything, he could just observe. Tommy had an excellent lawyer, a senior barrister named Alisdair Williamson, KC. Williamson was the barrister who won an important case for Tommy against the Metropolitan Police, when they illegally banned him from entering London. Today’s appeal was for the sentence Tommy received for his contempt of court conviction. Normally, an appeal is just on the existing record — that is, the evidence that was heard by the sentencing judge. There is no new evidence; it’s not a do-over. The higher court merely weighs whether or not the trial judge got it right or wrong. Williamson made the case today that there was important “fresh evidence” that the Court of Appeal should consider — namely, that an independent psychologist has visited Tommy in prison, and written up a detailed, 39-page diagnosis of his mental health after so many months in solitary confinement. Williamson said that information was obviously not in the hands of the sentencing judge, but the Court of Appeal should consider it. The government’s main lawyer was Aidan Eardley, KC. I felt like he was weaker. And his argument in response to the psychologist’s report was essentially, “so what?” As in, he didn’t care that Tommy was being made mentally ill by keeping him in isolation; he told the three-judge panel that if Tommy really wanted to get out of prison, he should just delete the Twitter video that got him thrown in prison in the first place. Here’s a ten-minute video that I recorded right after the hearing was over: I thought Tommy’s lawyers did well. But appeals are inherently uphill battles. Higher courts are reluctant to overturn lower courts unless the trial judge got something very wrong. It’s up to the Court of Appeal to decide whether to allow that fresh evidence in, and whether to give it any weight. I’m really starting to worry that it is now impossible for Tommy to get justice in the UK legal system. He has been so demonized, and the government is so obviously pursuing a vendetta, he really has become an “enemy of the state”, as his book is titled. I saw a story in the Times of London last week that said on any given day in the UK, police arrest 30 people for social media posts. 30 per day! Frankly, I doubt Russia’s Vladimir Putin arrests that many for social media posts. An entire system has been built to censor ideas and block people from speaking out. Tommy has been the “test case” for that. The judges concluded by saying they’ll release their ruling in the days ahead. I’m not optimistic, but you never know — remember, Tommy beat the Met Police in court, and that was the same lawyer. He’ll keep fighting for freedom. And the least I can do is keep going to court to live-tweet about it, to ensure that the mainstream media isn’t the only source of news as to what happened. Ezra Levant Rebel News

Helen Grus was a fearless officer who worked as an investigator in the sexual assault and child abuse unit within the Ottawa Police Service. Part of her role in the unit bound her by law to investigate every death of a child under the age of 5. That is until she began investigating whether the rollout of the COVID shots was linked to several suspicious deaths in the region. Detective Grus was concerned that increases in infant deaths in Ottawa mirrored Pfizer's adverse event reports, but her brief probe into the police records management system was shot down by her superiors, and she was put on trial instead. After a three-year disciplinary hearing, Grus was found guilty of discreditable conduct for accessing the police records management system with a "personal interest." During the hearing, Grus was represented by lawyer Bath-Sheba van den Berg, who is now speaking out about the case and the key evidence ignored by the tribunal's hearing officer Chris Renwick. Click here to watch my exclusive interview. When examining the evidence, van den Berg says at least five, if not six, of these deaths had circumstances similar to those detailed in the adverse events report, which a Texas court ordered to be released despite Pfizer's attempts to keep it sealed for 75 years. Pointing to a case from December 2021, "the one baby girl that died in December, just a few weeks after a policy came out from the Toronto Sick Kids Hospital to treat children with myocarditis because they were aware that the COVID-19 vaccinations caused myocarditis in children," explains van den Berg. "And then, less than a month later, we have a baby girl die with an enlarged heart in the mother's arms." Was this really a case of an officer overstepping her authority, or was this trial simply a politically motivated witch hunt to protect the "safe and effective" narrative? What do you think? Tamara Ugolini P.S. While the nightmare of COVID mandates and lockdowns may be slipping from memory, the fallout from those three years is not over. At NoMoreShots.ca, we're telling the other side of the story that our state-funded media is too scared to cover. On that site, we've also made it easy for you to take action — with one click, you can email government officials and demand they revoke market authorization of the shots before more people are hurt.