Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!

3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Give Thanks. There is more to this prayer here

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Showing posts with label lawsuits. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawsuits. Show all posts

Tuesday, 21 October 2025

CSA in the USA > Insurer falls under the weight of CSA lawsuits

 

NY child sex abuse law blamed for fall of Bermuda insurer


A Chapter 15 petition for recognition of the Bermuda insolvency proceedings of an insurer has been filed by its joint provisional liquidators at a federal bankruptcy court in New York (File photograph)

A 2019 New York state law that extended the statute of limitations for victims of childhood sexual abuse has brought down a half-century old Bermuda insurer, Offshore Alert has reported.

The new law extended to 55 years the statute of limitations for victims of childhood sexual abuse to bring civil lawsuits against their abusers and institutions.

It has meant that a 50-year-old Bermuda insurer, Northeast Insurance Co Ltd, has gone into liquidation as a result of “unforeseeable” multimillion-dollar claims.

After the law was introduced, 55 claims were brought in New York against defendants insured by the company, the publication has reported.

Offshore Alert said that the number of claims was stated in a Chapter 15 petition for recognition of Northeast’s Bermuda insolvency proceedings that its joint provisional liquidators filed at a federal bankruptcy court in New York.

Northeast, a Class 2 Bermuda insurer, which opened in 1975 and was owned by five non-profit institutions associated with the United Jewish Appeal and Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, petitioned the Bermuda Supreme Court to be wound up earlier this month.

The company told the Bermuda court that in 2017, it decided to cease underwriting new risks and to enter a process of running off its existing liabilities.

The company was party to a number of claims brought against alleged perpetrators, and by the end of June, was aware of more than 30 such claims under the new Act.

But in August, there were some 23 further claims arising under policies fronted by various insurers. The unexpected exposure to claims necessitated a materially higher loss-reserve provision than previously reflected in its audited financial statements.

“The CVA claims were unforeseeable at the time of cessation of writing new policies and, therefore, no corresponding reserves were funded at that time,” it was stated. “The debtor has determined that the liabilities associated with the CVA claims likely exceed the debtor’s assets. Accordingly, the Bermuda proceeding was commenced to benefit from the mandatory stay of proceedings provided under Bermuda law and enable the debtor to preserve its assets for the benefit of creditors as a whole.”

Mike Morrison of Teneo, joint provisional liquidator for Northeast Insurance Co Ltd (Photograph supplied)

The insurer filed a petition to wind up its affairs at the Bermuda Supreme Court on October 7, with Michael Morrison and Mark Allitt of Teneo appointed as Joint Provisional Liquidators two days later, the Chapter 15 petition stated.

In the Bermuda winding-up petition that was attached to the American filing, it was stated that: “Under New York state law, these cases are allocated over the years that the abuse is alleged to happen, as opposed to one single year. This horizontal application of the CVA claims over a multiyear period has had a significant impact on the company’s financial position and the unexpected exposure to claims has necessitated a materially higher loss-reserve provision than that previously reflected in its most recent audited financial statements.

Mark Allitt of Teneo, joint provisional liquidator for Northeast Insurance Co Ltd (Photograph supplied)

“Due to the additional, unanticipated exposure, the company’s outstanding losses and loss expense reserves increased from $15.649 million to $29.068 million. As a result, the company’s board of directors has determined that the company is insolvent on both a cashflow and balance-sheet basis. The company will not be able to pay the losses implied in the reserves. The board considers that, as matters stand, absent the intervention of this court and the appointment of JPLs, the company will be unable to raise sufficient funds to meet all of the anticipated settlement payments in respect of the CVA claims.”

=====================================================================================


Tuesday, 10 June 2025

Child Sex Abuse Laws > Pennsylvania finally gives CSA survivors a break; Bill in Irish Senate to rename child porn - CSAM

 

Pennsylvania House approves 2-year 'window' for time-barred child sex abuse lawsuits



Pennsylvania House lawmakers on Monday passed legislation that would open a two-year window for survivors of child sex abuse to sue their abusers on claims that currently fall beyond the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits.

The measure passed in both a regular piece of legislation and as the first leg of a constitutional amendment, the latter of which would kick off a multi-year process that couldn't conclude before 2027 and would be put to voters for final approval.

Supporters say the two-year window would offer victims of child sex abuse a chance to hold their abusers accountable and bring them to court on abuse that happened when they were too young to realize there was a limited amount of time to sue.

Rep. Nate Davidson, D-Dauphin/Cumberland, said the measure is long overdue.

"I can't think of another issue that's been voted upon so many times with such overwhelming support that still isn't across the finish line. There's been a lot of finger-pointing over the years, partisan divides, interchamber divides, mistakes by the previous administration. There's a lot of reasons, but ultimately it falls back at our feet in the legislature," he said.

The bills now head to the Senate, where legal concerns about the statutory bill have been raised. Leaders with the Republican caucus have also sought to tie an amendment dealing with voter ID to the constitutional legislation.

The provision has been debated and voted on a number of times over the years, but failed to become law.




Bill to update child sex abuse material terminology

should be a 'no-brainer', says senator


Bill to update child sex abuse material terminology should be a 'no-brainer', says senator

The Child Trafficking and Child Sexual Exploitation Material (Amendment) Bill 2022 will be voted on at 

third stage in the Seanad on Wednesday. Picture: iStock


Legislation to change terminology around the portrayal of child sex abuse material online will come before the Seanad (Irish Senate) this week.

The Child Trafficking and Child Sexual Exploitation Material (Amendment) Bill 2022 will be voted on at third stage in the Seanad on Wednesday.

It seeks to replace the term "child pornography" in legislation including the Child Trafficking and Pornography Act 1998 and the Child Trafficking and Pornography (Amendment) Act 2004.

One of the sponsors of the bill, senator Eileen Flynn, said the legislation should be a “no-brainer for the Government”, adding that bringing it in will not cost money and will “have a dramatic impact on the victims, the children". 

Ms Flynn says the use of the term “child pornography” implies that consent has been given, which a child is not in a position to give, she said.

Reflective of reality

She said the term “child sexual abuse material” is more reflective of the reality, and she believes that Irish law should echo that.

She also pointed to the Luxembourg guidelines, accepted by a group of 18 organisations including the UN, which advocate that nations should replace “child pornography” with “child sexual abuse material”.

Mecpaths, an organisation which works to raise awareness of child trafficking in Ireland, has been supportive of the bill since its introduction three years ago.

The organisation's networks and communications manager, JP O’Sullivan, said: “The recognition of images of child sexual abuse for what they are is a significant step in acknowledging the harm, the abuse, and the exploitation of children.

This is a very small and tentative first step for the Irish, but the journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. Hopefully, they will pick up some momentum soon and get serious about fighting child sexual abuse.



Thursday, 13 January 2022

Perverted Lives of the Rich and Famous > Virginia can sue Andrew; Prince Andrew loses all Military titles; CNN Producer sued for despicable, horrific acts of CSA

..

Sex abuse lawsuit against Prince Andrew can proceed — judge


Disgraced British royal now faces testimony or settlement in US lawsuit


Britain's Prince Andrew. © AFP / CARL COURT


A Manhattan court has given the go-ahead for Virginia Giuffre’s sexual assault case against the UK’s Prince Andrew. The prince’s lawyers had tried to have the case dismissed due to a settlement between Giuffre and Jeffrey Epstein.

US District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ruled on Wednesday that Giuffre’s civil case against Andrew can move ahead to trial.

Giuffre claims that deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his recently-convicted girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell trafficked her to the Duke of York for sex on three separate occasions when she was 17 years old.

Earlier this month the prince’s legal team pressed Kaplan to dismiss the case, after it emerged that Epstein paid Giuffre $500,000 in a 2009 settlement, in which she agreed not to sue anyone linked to the convicted pedophile who could be a “potential defendant.” 

Kaplan, however, sided with Giuffre’s lawyers, who argued that the agreement was only signed for Epstein’s benefit, not that of a “third party” like Andrew. As such, the prince’s motion to dismiss was “denied in all respects.”

Andrew denies the allegations, and has insisted that he doesn’t recall ever even meeting Giuffre. The royal maintained his denial even after being shown a photograph of himself and Giuffre together in London during a BBC interview in 2019. More recently he has accused Giuffre of seeking a “payday” from the case.

The trial now moves into what may be a lengthy phase of discovery and deposition, should the two parties fail to reach a settlement. During this phase, other members of the British royal family may be summoned to testify.




Prince Andrew loses military titles and use of HRH


Britain's Prince Andrew during the commemorative ceremony of the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Bruges, in Bruges, Belgium, 07 September 2019 (reissued 13 January 2022)


The Duke of York's military titles and royal patronages have been returned to the Queen, Buckingham Palace has said.

Prince Andrew, 61, will also stop using the style His Royal Highness in an official capacity, a royal source said.

It comes as he faces a US civil action over sexual assault allegations - claims he has consistently denied.

A source close to the duke said he would "continue to defend himself" against the case brought in New York by Virginia Giuffre.

A judge in the city ruled on Wednesday that the case brought by Ms Giuffre could continue, after the prince tried to have it dismissed.

Buckingham Palace said in a statement: "With the Queen's approval and agreement, the Duke of York's military affiliations and Royal patronages have been returned to the Queen.

"The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen."

All Prince Andrew's roles have been returned to the Queen with immediate effect, and will be redistributed to other members of the Royal Family, a source said.

The issue had been widely discussed with the Royal Family, the source said.

Like Harry and Meghan, Prince Andrew retains his title HRH but will not use it in any official capacity.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence said it had no comment about the duke's military titles being handed back to the Queen, and that it was a matter for the Palace.

On Thursday, a letter - released by anti-monarchy pressure group Republic - was signed by more than 150 Royal Navy, RAF and Army veterans asking the Queen to strip Prince Andrew of his eight British military titles.

The duke had a 22-year career in the Royal Navy, and served as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands War.

The latest Palace announcement means he has lost military titles including Colonel of the Grenadier Guards - one of the most senior infantry regiments in the British army.

The other UK military titles he no longer has include:

Honorary air commodore of RAF Lossiemouth
Colonel-in-chief of the Royal Irish Regiment
Colonel-in-chief of the Small Arms School Corps
Colonel-in-chief of The Royal Lancers (Queen Elizabeth's Own)
Colonel-in-chief of the Yorkshire Regiment
Colonel-in-chief of the Small Arms School Corps
Commodore-in-Chief of the Fleet Air Arm
Royal colonel of the Royal Highland Fusiliers
Royal colonel of the Royal Regiment of Scotland.

The duke will also lose several overseas honorary roles including colonel-in-chief of The Royal Highland Fusiliers Of Canada, colonel-in-chief of the Royal New Zealand Army Logistic Regiment, colonel-in-chief of the Princess Louise Fusiliers of Canada and colonel-in-chief of the Queen's York Rangers (1st American Regiment).

But he will retain his service rank of Vice-Admiral, the Palace has confirmed.

As an ex-member of the armed forces, he was promoted in line with his still-serving peers and made Vice-Admiral by the Navy on his 55th birthday in 2015.

The duke was due to be promoted to Admiral on his 60th birthday in 2020, but asked to defer this after stepping back from public duties in 2019.

At the time, the Palace said his other military appointments had been suspended.

Several other charities and organisations had cut their ties with the duke, but he continued to hold dozens of royal patronages - including being a patron or member of prestigious golf clubs, schools and cultural trusts.

There is more on this story at BBC.





Ex-CNN producer accused of ‘despicable acts’ against minor


Arrested former senior CNN producer John Griffin hit by pedophilia lawsuit


John Griffin in police custody, December 22, 2021. © Vermont State Police/AP


A lawsuit filed against former CNN producer John Griffin on behalf of an alleged underage sex crime victim seeks $15 million in damages and fees. Griffin was arrested last month on child sex trafficking charges.

Griffin is accused of “despicable acts” of “horrific sexual abuse” of a minor, Fox News reported on Tuesday, citing a civil lawsuit filed in Connecticut last week.

“For several years prior to 2020, the defendant solicited young girls, including the minor plaintiff, for the purpose of knowingly persuading, inducing, enticing and coercing them to engage in sexual activity, sexual exploitation, and/or sexual trafficking,” the lawsuit alleges.

The case against Griffin was brought on behalf of a nine-year-old girl, dubbed Jane Doe in court documents. The suit is seeking up to $15 million in damages and fees, Fox News said.

A former producer of Chris Cuomo’s show on CNN, Griffin was arrested on child sex trafficking charges last month and fired from the channel. According to prosecutors, in 2020, Griffin paid a Nevada woman more than $3,000 to fly her to Boston and then commit sex crimes that involved her adopted daughter at his vacation home in Vermont.

The evidence reportedly includes a drone video of the defendant in his underwear standing next to a completely naked nine-year-old girl. 

Griffin pleaded not guilty to the charges in December. 

CNN said at the time that the channel was unaware of Griffin’s actions and called charges against him “deeply disturbing.”

Perhaps that's true, but one can't help but wonder how such a person's character wasn't a warning sign?




Wednesday, 16 June 2021

Positive Stories in the War on Child Sexual Abuse > 2 Projects to Clean Up Russia; Louisiana Removes Deadlines; Hungary Goes Russian on LGBTQ

Russia mulls 70-year social media & press interview ban for murderers, rapists & pedophiles in bid to stop glamorization of evil

10 Jun, 2021 14:06

(L) Law enforcement agents near the unidentified man who stabbed Tatyana Felgengauer, a host at the Echo of Moscow radio station, with a knife. © Sputnik / Vitaly Ruvinsky; (R) Blood stains on the floor at the Echo of Moscow radio station. © Sputnik / Vitaly Ruvinsky

A Russian lawmaker has put forward a draft bill that would block those convicted of shocking and violent crimes from speaking to journalists, writing memoirs or sharing their thoughts on social media for lengthy stretches of time.

Dmitry Sablin, an MP from the governing United Russia party unveiled the proposals on Thursday. The additional measures could be tacked on to sentences handed down by judges for the most serious offenses, including murder, rape and pedophilia.

If passed, the rule change would give judges the power to extend bans for up to 70 years, which would cover “appearances in any media, at public meetings, cultural events, meetings and on the internet.” It would also enable them to prohibit convicts to maintain social media accounts, publish memoirs or be paid for performances or speeches.

Organizations falling foul of the restrictions on publishing material from killers and other serious criminals would potentially face fines of at least 300,000 rubles ($4,160 USD) and could be ordered to suspend operations for up to six months.

300,000 rubles seems woefully inadequate a fine. A good story can make you many times that amount.

“A recent interview with a maniac, who made jokes and promised to ‘take care of’ a surviving victim – which cynics tried to call ‘research into evil’ – proves the urgent need for these measures,” Sablin said.

In March, influential Russian presenter and one-time presidential candidate, Ksenia Sobchak, published a sit-down conversation held with Viktor Mokhov, who served 16 years behind bars for kidnapping, drugging and repeatedly raping two teenage girls. He held the pair captive in a basement near his house in the town of Skopin, south of Moscow, for more than 40 months, where one woman gave birth to two sons. Branded by Russian media as ‘the Skopinsky maniac’, he was released from jail just days prior to the interview.

And do you seriously think that fear of a 300,000 ruble fine is going to stop her from doing it again.





'Bravo to Louisiana': John Bel Edwards signs bill

removing deadlines for child sex-abuse lawsuits

BY RAMON ANTONIO VARGAS
PUBLISHED JUN 14, 2021 AT 7:14 PM

Governor John Bel Edwards speaks during a press conference at the conclusion of legislative session, Thursday, June 10, 2021, at the Louisiana State Capitol in Baton Rouge, La.

Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards signed a legislative bill removing deadlines for child sex abuse victims to pursue damages in civil court, capping off a major victory for survivors of the Catholic Church’s clerical molestation scandal.

The law, which takes effect Aug. 1, creates a three-year window where all unresolved child molestation claims — no matter how old — can be pursued in civil court.

“The scars of childhood sexual abuse may stay with survivors long-term, and they deserve more time to report these devastating crimes,” Edwards spokesperson Christina Stephens said.

Sponsored by state Rep. Jason Hughes, D-New Orleans, House Bill 492 reforms a 28-year-old law which gave child sex molestation victims in Louisiana until their 28th birthday to initiate litigation over their abuse.

Hughes cited research that showed that the average age for child sex-abuse victims to come forward and report their ordeals is 52. Though the new law will apply to a wide range of victims, Hughes’ bill received key support from a coalition of people who were abused by Catholic priests and deacons, their attorneys and a national advocacy group that took up their cause and specializes in strengthening child protection laws.

A series of amendments proposed to earlier versions of Hughes’ bill delayed the final vote on it until Thursday, the last day of the 2021 legislative session. But after all the amendments were incorporated on Thursday, the House and Senate voted unanimously to advance the bill to Edwards’ desk.

State Sen. Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, introduced amendments to Hughes’ bill to eliminated filing deadlines for child sex abuse lawsuits — rather than simply extend them — and opened the three-year period known as a “lookback window.”

Hughes had initially omitted a provision for a lookback window from an early version of his bill because he said he wanted to avoid a fight with the insurance lobby.

But the amended bill ultimately sailed through both of the state’s legislative chambers. And Edwards’ signature on the bill Monday made Louisiana only the 22nd state to adopt such a lookback window.

“Not only will this (law) afford victims of horrific child sexual abuse justice, but it will also make the children of Louisiana safer,” said a statement from Child USAdvocacy Director Kathryn Robb, who helped Hughes draft the bill. “The light of truth is both healing and protective. Bravo to Louisiana.”




Hungary bans ‘promotion’ of homosexuality and transgenderism

to under-18s amid protests

15 Jun, 2021 14:28

© Reuters / Marton Monus

A law prohibiting the sharing of content portraying homosexuality and transgenderism to those under the age of 18 has been passed by Hungary’s National Assembly.

The vote passed on Tuesday by a vote of 157-1.

The law was included in a larger bill cracking down on pedophilia by creating a register of child sex offenders, implementing stricter punishments for child pornography, and barring pedophile offenders from jobs where they would encounter children. It also singled out the promotion of LGBT affairs in schools.

Sex education in schools “must not be aimed” at “promoting homosexuality” or “changing gender,” said Fidesz, the ruling party of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, in a press release following the vote.

Additionally, those under the age of 18 cannot be shown pornographic content, or any content, deemed as promoting homosexuality or transgenderism – with television shows, movies, and advertisements included.

Television stations and streaming platforms will only be able to target such content at adults.

Though the bill was supported by members of the ruling Fidesz and right-wing Jobbik parties, all opposition parties boycotted the vote in protest, while several civil rights groups including Amnesty International Hungary, the Hungarian LGBT Association, and Budapest Pride condemned the move – comparing Hungary to “autocratic states” Russia and China, which have similar laws in place.

Thousands of Hungarians also took to the streets in protest on Monday, where they carried LGBT rainbow flags and shouted, “We are here!”

Last year, Hungary passed a bill prohibiting same-sex couples from adopting children.

The passing of the law is yet another blow to Hungary’s rocky relationship with Brussels, and European Union officials have already begun to condemn it.

“Using child protection as an excuse to target LGBTIQ people is damaging to all children in Hungary,” said Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield, a French Green Party MEP who serves as the European Parliament rapporteur on the rule of law in Hungary.

I think anyone who really knows anything about the damage LGBTQ and transgenderism is doing to children will disagree strongly with Gwendoline.

So glad to see Hungary stand up against the madness that is being taught in schools and elsewhere.




Hardcore regulations? Russian government could control access to porn under new proposals designed to protect underage children

16 Jun, 2021 13:02

© Getty Images / JLGutierrez

Russian lovers of adult content (and there are far too many of them) could soon be forced to ask their government for permission before they can access saucy snaps and spicy clips online, with a public services portal acting as the gateway to all legal pornography.

The new proposals, from Moscow’s General Radio Frequency Centre, a subsidiary of state media watchdog Roskomnadzor, would see X-rated material shuttered away in an adults-only area on the internet. All pornography would be categorized as either ‘illegal’ or ‘not prohibited by law’.

While banned pornography would include that featuring minors and depicting “clearly offensive” themes such as rape, permitted pictures and videos would be “naturalistic images or descriptions of the genitals of an adult and/or sexual intercourse or comparable sexual activity of a sexual nature involving adults with their consent.”

But while that might sound too tantalizing to pass up (see, that's a typically Russian attitude toward pornography), only those over the age of 18 would be able to access the content, having to sign in through a state-run public services portal before feasting their eyes on the trove.

Roman Korostashov, acting head of the Scientific and Technical Center at the General Radio Frequency Centre, said the plans were a no-brainer. “Our main task is to protect children from destructive content,” he said, emphasizing that cracking down on illegal online material was one of the group’s main focuses.

It is, however, unclear whose job it would be to trawl the depths of the web and decide which porn falls into which category. Equally unclear is how it would work in practice, given the widespread availability of proxy servers that allow net users to access pretty much whatever they want.

Last week, Roskomnadzor warned that major tech giants including Facebook, Twitter, and Google are continuing to host shocking illegal material online, despite thousands of requests from its officials to take down prohibited posts. According to them, more than 10,000 banned posts are still up, including “child pornography, suicidal and pro-narcotic content, the involvement of minors in illegal activities and illegal mass events,” as well as “materials from extremist and terrorist organizations.”

At the start of the year, President Vladimir Putin warned that companies were taking too relaxed an attitude to protecting the public. “These platforms are, of course, primarily businesses,” he said, “and what is the primary concern of a business? Making a profit. They don’t care if this content or that content causes harm for the people at whom it is directed.”

At the same time, Putin said, “we must not make decisions that would limit human freedoms – the freedom of choice and freedom of speech.”



Wednesday, 7 April 2021

Positive Stories in the War on Child Sex Abuse > Kazakh Castrations; Blocking Puberty Blockers - Ark; PA House Moving on CSA Lawsuits

..
In Kazakhstan, twenty-five convicted pedophiles have been chemically castrated by court order just this year
3 Apr, 2021 08:37

In Kazakhstan, twenty-five convicted pedophiles have been chemically castrated by court order just this year, official reveals

A view shows Akorda, the official residence of Kazakhstan's President, before the lights are switched off for Earth Hour in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan March 27, 2021. © Reuters / Vasily Fedosenko

Different nations have varied justice systems, but it is agreed unanimously that child rape is one of the most heinous crimes. In Kazakhstan, the punishment is castration – and, this year, 25 prisoners have had the injection.

Chemical castration works by inserting anaphrodisiac drugs that reduce the libido by blocking testosterone. According to a Kazakh law (2nd story on link) that came into force in 2018, those sentenced to time in jail for raping a minor can be court-ordered to receive it as a punishment. The effects of the injection do not last forever, and it needs to be re-administered every three months.

"As of today, there are 25 convicts serving their sentences in the penal system who have been sentenced by a court to compulsory measures in the form of chemical castration," said Alexey Milyuk, an official in the country's Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Speaking to Kazakh news outlet Otyrar, one of the convicts who received the injection called for the practice to be outlawed, saying he would "not wish it on [his] worst enemy."

"I'm asking for help, and I want to appeal to everyone to stop this castration. I still hope to go home and continue to live. I want a family and children," he said. "After the injection, my whole body aches so much that it's hard to walk. It's scary."

Although seen by some as inhumane, chemical castration has been employed in several countries, including Poland and South Korea, as well as in a number of American states. Some countries even offer reduced sentences for those who agree to be injected.

When the law was passed, 9.6 million tenge (about $22,500) from the national budget was allocated for measures to reduce sexual libido, with the price of castrating each individual patient sitting at around 125 thousand tenge (about $295) per year.




Arkansas becomes first state to ban surgery, hormones and puberty blockers for transgender youths
6 Apr, 2021 20:35

Lawmakers in Arkansas voted on Tuesday to override a veto from Gov. Asa Hutchinson on banning surgery and treatment for transgender minors.

The Republican-controlled House and Senate in the state approved the measure despite objections from the governor and activists. The measure bans doctors from providing surgery, hormonal treatment, or puberty blockers to transgender youths if they are below 18 years of age. 

The override was pushed through with a 72-25 vote in the House and 25-8 vote in the Senate. 

The Republican governor vetoed the legislation on Monday, saying it creates “new standards of legislative interference with physicians and parents as they deal with some of the most complex and sensitive matters involving young people.” He also said the bill does not “grandfather those young people who are currently under hormone treatment.”

Hutchinson did sign a bill last month that allows doctors to refuse service in non-emergency cases to patients if they have a moral or religious objection. Critics have said this measure too will provide opportunities to discriminate against the LGBTQ community. 

Republican Rep. Robin Lundstrum, who sponsored the bill, has countered that people should be legal adults before they make such drastic physical alterations.

The ban would officially take effect this summer, but opponents have promised to sue to block the measure before it becomes law, with The American Civil Liberties Union promising in a statement that they are in the political battle for “the long haul.” 




Pa House passes statutory window for old child abuse lawsuits,
splitting GOP majority
By Stephen Caruso
Penn Capitol-Star
-April 7, 2021

Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, was abused by a priest as a child and has been at the forefront of the PA General Assembly's attempts to adjust laws for victims of childhood sexual abuse. (Capital-Star photo by Stephen Caruso)

By a 149-52 vote, the Pennsylvania House on Wednesday approved a measure allowing survivors of childhood sexual abuse to sue their perpetrators and those who shielded them.

Unlike a constitutional amendment the Legislature passed last month, this proposal could become law with a wave of Gov. Tom Wolf’s pen, and allow for immediate court action. 

The constitutional amendment would not allow lawsuits until at least 2023, following a second pass through the General Assembly, and approval by the voters at a statewide referendum.

“We have done so many bills out of the House. And they stick with the survivors. I want them to stick with us one more time,” state Rep. Mark Rozzi, D-Berks, the measure’s sponsor, told the Capital-Star. “Let’s get this done, send it over to the Senate, and get to the other business at hand.”

Childhood victims of sexual abuse run out of time to sue for damages after they turn 30 years old. This bill would give them a two-year reprieve from that statute of limitations, allowing them to revive old claims in court. 

Such a period to file old lawsuits was on track to be implemented this year, but the Department of State under Wolf failed to properly advertise the amendment.

The statutory change, while long sought, faces long odds in the upper chamber, which returns to Harrisburg on April 19. 

Senate Majority Leader Kim Ward, R-Westmoreland, maintains that such a law would violate the state constitution. She said in March that her caucus would only pursue the reform as a constitutional amendment – a process that can take years. 

Her spokeswoman told the Capital-Star on Tuesday that the leader’s position hadn’t changed. 

As floor leader, Ward controls what bills are on the Senate’s calendar, effectively giving her the final say on which bills come up for a vote or not.

But she’s outranked in her caucus by the chamber’s influential President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, R-Centre, who, according to an advocate for survivors, broke with Ward on a statutory fix.

Carolyn Fortney, a Dauphin County woman who was abused as a child by the same priest who also abused her sisters, announced in a Facebook post on March 24 that Corman pledged his support for a statutory bill in a meeting in his Capitol office. 

Fortney and her sisters have been leading voices of the reform effort in recent years, appearing frequently at the Capitol to testify at public hearings and lobby lawmakers. 

Corman’s office has not responded to repeated requests for comment about Fortney’s visit. But the Office of the Attorney General, which in 2018 published the grand jury report on clergy sex abuse that recommended a retroactive window, indicated in a statement that Corman supported the statutory fix

In a written statement issued in late March, Attorney General Josh Shapiro told the Capital-Star that he was “heartened by the commitment that the Senate President Pro Tempore has made to survivors” to push a floor vote on the statutory change.

“Sen. Corman did not create this mess we find ourselves in — the Department of State did — but his efforts to find a just solution are appreciated,” Shapiro said.

The House last passed a statutory window for lawsuits in late 2018 by a vote of 173-21, after Shapiro’s office released its grand jury report. 

It was passed in direct opposition from then-Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Jefferson. Scarnati, who has since retired, blocked that statutory proposal from a Senate vote in Oct. 2018, despite frantic lobbying efforts by abuse survivors — such as Rozzi.

The constitutional amendment was picked up as a new strategy in 2019 to get around Scarnati’s concerns, who claimed the statutory window for post facto lawsuits was unconstitutional.

The amendment was championed by Rep. Jim Gregory, R-Blair, first elected in 2018 and also a childhood survivor of abuse.

The amendment passed both House and Senate easily last session, and was on track to appear on the state’s 2021 primary ballot when Wolf announced his administration had not advertised the amendment’s passage as is legally required.

The error reset the time table for implementing the amendment, to the horror of survivors. An effort to use a seldom used emergency constitutional amendment also fell short last month.

Wednesday’s vote split the Republican caucus down the middle, a rarity in the legislature. All but one of the dissenting votes was cast by a GOP lawmaker.

At least 21 Republican lawmakers in office in 2018 flipped from a yes to a no on the statutory window, according to a Capital-Star review of voting records.



Sunday, 4 April 2021

Time for Historical Child Sex Abuse Law Suits is Running Out in NY. You Must Act Soon or the Door Will Close.

..
New York child sex abuse victims running out of time
to go to court: advocates
By Kathianne Boniello, NY Post
April 3, 2021 | 2:43pm

Children's Village victim Scott Sartory   Provided by Scott Sartory

Time is running out for childhood sex abuse victims in New York to get justice.

The legal window opened by New York’s Child Victims Act, which permits old claims to be brought to court, closes Aug. 14.

More than 5,100 cases have been filed so far in the state, with nearly half, 2,392, filed in the five boroughs, according to the Office of Court Administration.

The 2019 legislation originally lifted the statute of limitations on such cases for a year, but the deadline was later extended.

The most prolific church-related abuser in New York identified so far may be a Bronx coach believed to have molested an entire generation of kids, according to attorney Jeff Herman, who has been contacted by more than 60 accusers so far, and filed lawsuits on behalf of 44.

Our Lady of Mount Carmel basketball coach Rudy Tremaroli, who died in 1992, started out as a janitor and later ran a youth program, summer camp and community center, where he hosted movie nights.

Tremaroli’s victims may be the second most in New York, behind only to Rockefeller University’s Dr. Reginald Archibald (5th story on the link), Herman believes.

“Rudy was a serial predator who sexually assaulted, I believe, hundreds of little boys in the Mount Carmel community — at the church, at the school, at the community center. He was also a prolific creator of child porn using these little boys,” Herman told The Post. “There’s a lost generation of little boys who fell victim to this.”

What’s especially striking in Tremaroli’s case: the coach was never removed from the community, school or church, despite years of victims reporting the alleged abuse.

Rudy Tremaroli worked at Our Lady of Mount Carmel in the Bronx. There are now at least 53 cases filed against the late Tremaroli.
Courtesy of Herman Law

“He was protected,” Herman said.

Multiple victims have also come forward alleging chilling abuse at the Children’s Village, a century-old Westchester child welfare agency, according to court papers.

At least 28 alleged victims from the Children’s Village have come forward to one Manhattan law firm, said attorneys Rob Greenstein and Michael Barnett.

The alleged victims describe brutal attacks from older, stronger kids at Children’s Village, as well as staffers, including being groped, beaten, forced into oral sex and anally raped, according to the lawsuits already filed against the organization from those claiming they were abused in the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s.

One victim was abused so violently they were sent to the hospital for an injured penis, according to court papers.

“Children’s Village was a nightmare... Prison was easier"

Scott Sartory, 42, went to Children’s Village when he was 5 and was later adopted by one of his abusers, he claims in court papers. He fled the adoptive parent’s home at age 12, preferring to live on the streets.

“Children’s Village was a nightmare,” he told The Post. “I was incarcerated in 1998. Prison was easier in my lifetime than the Children’s Village.”

Sartory doesn’t think there should be a deadline for victims to file the such claims.

“This happened when I was 6 years old,” he said. “It was dying with me. It took me over 30 years to make that decision [to come forward].”

Juan Nazario was just 8 when he went to Children’s Village. The 49-year-old filed his lawsuit after his son told him about the Child Victim’s Act.

“That was a door I didn’t want to open,” he said of his decision to go public.

“Every child deserves and needs to feel safe, secure, and supported,” a Children’s Village spokesman told The Post. “We take significant and wide-reaching steps to ensure that’s what every child in our care can count on every day.”

For Chynna Valentin, who was sent to the all-boys institution at age 9 in the 1970s and later transitioned to being a woman, the lawsuit is about protecting children.

“I didn’t come forward for some kind of monetary gain,” she insisted.

Valentin, now 58, cried as she spoke. “If just one person, if just one child can hear what we’ve been through and come forward to stop this from happening to one more child, that’s it. That’s all I want.”

Don't settle for one when there are millions every single day! At the very least, pray for them.


Saturday, 13 June 2020

This Week's Catholic Pervs n Paedos List > NY-2, NJ, NZ, Wyoming

Diocese of Rockville Centre, NY, threatens bankruptcy in face of child sex-abuse lawsuits
By Kathianne Boniello

Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre Al Bello/Getty Images

One of the nation’s largest Catholic dioceses is threatening bankruptcy if a Long Island judge doesn’t pause the nearly 100 child sex-abuse lawsuits it faces.

The Diocese of Rockville Centre, which serves more than 1.4 million Catholics in Nassau and Suffolk counties, claims it’s in an “ever-more serious financial situation,” straining under the legal costs of defending itself in court while its income has been devastated by the coronavirus pandemic, according to court papers.

For two weeks during New York’s months-long virus shutdown, which canceled mass and church gatherings, the diocese received no money from parishioners — donations that usually account for 40 percent of the diocese’s income, it said.

Important dates on the Catholic calendar, including Holy Week and Easter Sunday, brought in a measly $363,000 from Long Islanders, down 60 percent, Rockville Centre claims.

The diocese, currently led by Bishop John Barres, has shelled out $3.7 million so far defending itself against 94 lawsuits filed against it under New York’s Child Victims Act, which provides a legal window to revive decades-old abuse claims. So far, two Catholic dioceses upstate, Rochester and Buffalo, have filed for bankruptcy because of CVA cases.

A bankruptcy proceeding could put all the property owned in the diocese “at risk,” said Michael Dowd, a lawyer for alleged victims who called the threat “callous.”

“They are pitting parishioners against the young people who suffered horrific abuse in a continuing attempt to refuse to accept responsibility,” he said.

The diocese called bankruptcy “a last resort” that is “not an attempt to turn its back on victims or shield predators from any punishment they deserve.”

Rockville Centre lost its challenge to the law’s constitutionality in April when Nassau Supreme Court Justice Steven Jaeger ruled the law “a reasonable response to remedy the injustice of past child sexual abuse.”

The diocese, which is appealing Jaeger’s decision, argues if it must continue to litigate the CVA cases while the appeal is ongoing, it will also be forced to end a program which has so far paid out $57 million to 320 abuse victims.

Rockville Center, NY


Former Mount Loretto resident was sexually abused by priest, religious brother, suit alleges

By Frank Donnelly | fdonnelly@siadvance.com

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. – A former resident who was placed in the Mission of the Immaculate Virgin at Mount Loretto more than 60 years ago said he only stayed for a few months.

The reason: A priest and a religious brother at the mission sexually abused him multiple times, a lawsuit alleges. So, he ran away back home.

The suit is the latest by a former resident alleging abuse at the one-time Pleasant Plains orphanage decades ago. (Staten Island Advance file photo)

Recently filed against the Archdiocese of New York and Catholic Charities of Staten Island, the suit is the latest claim of sexual abuse brought by a former resident of the Pleasant Plains shelter, which for decades was a haven for homeless and destitute children.

The litigation was filed in state Supreme Court, St. George, under the Child Victims Act.

Enacted last Aug. 14, the law created a one-year window for plaintiffs of any age to sue alleged abusers regardless of when the abuse occurred.

The law also allows victims of sexual abuse to sue their alleged abuser any time before they turn 55.

Last month, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a provision extending the filing period to Jan. 14, 2021, citing the statewide limitation of court functions due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The plaintiff, a Staten Island resident, is listed as John Doe 1.

“It is disappointing and unfortunate that another child, who had nowhere else to go and was entrusted to the priests and brothers at Mt. Loretto, experienced the type of extreme sexual abuse as alleged in this case,” said Bradley L. Rice, the plaintiff’s lawyer.

“This is just another horrific example that for decades the NY Archdiocese and Catholic Charities of Staten Island supervised institutions where pervasive child sexual abuse could and did occur,” Rice said. “Thankfully, because of the Child Victims Act, men like my client are finally able to come forward and seek justice.”

Joseph Zwilling, an Archdiocese spokesman, said the Archdiocese is aware of the suit, and “take(s) all allegations of sexual abuse seriously.” However, the Archdiocese is unable to comment on the specifics of any particular lawsuit, said Zwilling.

A civil complaint alleges that around 1959, the plaintiff and several of his siblings were placed in Mount Loretto because their parents were unable to properly care for them. The plaintiff was 13 then.

Shortly after his arrival, the boy was “targeted” by both a priest and a religious brother who “repeatedly sexually abused, raped and molested” him, alleges the complaint.

The priest would take the teen to a laundry room or dining room where he “forced” the youngster to engage in oral and anal sex, the complaint alleges. Once, the priest sexually molested the boy in his car, alleges the complaint.

“This abuse occurred so often that plaintiff is unable to recall the exact number of instances of rape and abuse,” the complaint contends. The molestation was so pervasive the boy ran away from Mount Loretto and returned to his parents’ home, alleges the complaint.

The Archdiocese and Catholic Charities “took no steps to prevent or stop plaintiff’s abuse,” the complaint alleges. The plaintiff alleges he suffered “emotional and psychological trauma and humiliation” due to the purported abuse.

The suit is one of several filed over the past year in which a number of one-time Mount Loretto residents allege they were abused at the hands of nuns, priests and lay employees at the former orphanage. Some of the alleged incidents date as far back as the 1950s, with the last extending into the early 1990s.

As the suits became public last year, several former Mount Loretto residents rallied to the mission’s defense. They told the Advance/SILive.com they were unaware of any sexual abuse that allegedly occurred on the grounds, nor had they ever heard of such incidents. 

If they were 'good Catholics' they would have rejected any such complaints as absurd.

Mount Loretto served as a children’s shelter beginning in the late 1800s and fostered thousands of children over its 100-plus year history. Many were wards of the court, either orphaned or from broken homes and other dire circumstances.

By 1964, it was the largest child-care institution in the U.S. The average stay for most youngsters was three years, but some could spend their entire teenage years at the facility.

The end of foster-care service was announced in 1994. Today, the campus is run by Catholic Charities of Staten Island and is home to two public schools, a senior and a community center, a food pantry and a day-care facility.




The lasting toxic effects of former NZ Catholic Marist brother Kevin Healy 
Georgia-May Gilbertson

Former Marist brother Kevin Healy, outside Napier District Court, shortly after pleading guilty to historical sex offending.
STUFF

A Catholic Marist Brother told a girl he sexually assaulted to push rotten tomatoes into her face because she was so "ugly".

The victim no longer lives in New Zealand, but the toxic memories of Kevin Healy's offending are a constant reminder of betrayal, fear and anger.

The 81 year old, previously known as ''Brother Gordon'', was sentenced to nine months of home detention when he appeared in the Napier District Court on June 5, after pleading guilty to four charges of indecency between a man and boys aged 12 and 13, and one of indecency with a girl aged under 12.

The offending occurred between 1976 and 1977 when Healy was a member of the Marist Brothers and an active school teacher in Wairarapa.

The female victim was just nine years old when he began assaulting her and her father notified the church about Healy's offending.

"Parents of the parish had a meeting about it and as a result highlighted it to church officials, my father being one of them. Brother Gordon was moved on from the school and parish, as was another offending Marist Brother," she said.

Healy was confronted by the church in 2003 after the victim made an official complaint, but denied all knowledge of the offending, including knowing her family. "This angered me into proceeding with charges as my father and mother were very prominent, faithful members of our parish," she said.

The woman said she felt as though the church had "turned their back" on her.

Post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression and a breakdown followed her throughout life. The Church offered counselling at the time of her complaint and, later, a $5000 payout..

"I believe the church knew about the abuse. He [Healy], like others, was simply moved on. I was one in a long chain of abuse."

"One has to understand that being a Catholic is not like a membership into a tennis club or something similar. It is a way of life, it is spiritually that one is taught to live by."

Unfortunately, for thousands of Catholic priests is was merely a performance to gain the trust of parents and access to their children.

The woman said Healy "normalised" his actions in that the children believed "he was a man of God". "I heard others talking about him and how he had touched them, and somehow that normalised it. However, I could not make sense of the fear I had around him."

The Catholic Church’s National Office for Professional Standards (NOPS) said it would look at all aspects of how the Marists dealt with complaints about Healy and another Marist brother, Michael Beaumont, in the 1970s.

Beaumont, a former Marist Brother, had been teaching and working in the Masterton community when he sexually abused the children.

He abused the 9-year-old girl while her family
had their eyes closed in prayer

Beaumont was sentenced at the North Shore District Court last year to 12 months' home detention for indecent assault and possessing obscene fantasy literature.

NOPS National Director Virginia Noonan said "Ms A" made formal complaints against the two men in the early 2000s to the Marist Brothers’ own abuse protocol body, but they were not upheld when the men denied them. “We will get an outside reviewer to look thoroughly at what was done and not done with Ms A’s complaints,” Noonan said.

“The Church has nothing but compassion and regret for what happened to Ms A. It is deeply disturbing that her ordeal has gone on for so many decades. We want to assure her that we will work with the Marist Brothers to address her very valid concerns.”

Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse Trust manager Ken Clearwater said he'd spoken to "hundreds if not thousands" of abuse survivors from the church  STUFF

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care was also investigating issues and neglect in faith-based institutions, including the Catholic Church.

"We encourage all victims/survivors of abuse in care to contact the commission with information that will assist our investigation," a spokesperson said.

" I offered to speak to them directly but that was declined. Their lawyers offered $5000 (for Healy and Beaumont's crimes) if I signed a wavier," the victim said.

She tried to speak to the Marist order directly, but her request was declined by its lawyers.

Ken Clearwater, from the National Advocate for Male Survivors of Sexual Abuse Trust, said he had spoken to "hundreds if not thousands of male victims" of sexual abuse from the Church during the years.

"Imagine if you're a 5-9 year old boy and you've got a priest telling you all these things [sexual acts] are bad, then they're made to do them, they have nowhere to go."

Clearwater said many victims from a church background who confronted their parents often "got a hiding" for saying "horrible things" about the priests.

"It's hard enough for your average survivor in general to come back from abuse, but to have that added burden of clergy embedded in you is absolutely horrendous and one of the biggest betrayals of trust to ever happen."




Numerous victims of childhood sex abuse
file lawsuits against Diocese of Trenton

Caution: graphic details in this story

By Sulaiman Abdur-Rahman sulaiman@Trentonian.com 

TRENTON — The Diocese of Trenton is facing numerous lawsuits alleging it failed time and again to prevent the sexual abuse of children.

These civil-action complaints in Mercer County Superior Court are a microcosm of the widespread sex abuse scandals rocking the Roman Catholic Church worldwide.

“It’s an epidemic in the Catholic Church, and it has been going on for centuries,” attorney John W. Baldante told The Trentonian in an interview. “The Catholic Church has largely ignored this behavior.”

Baldante represents at least 10 plaintiffs in lawsuits accusing the Diocese of Trenton of negligence, saying the institution failed to provide a safe environment and protective culture to children and other parishioners within the churches, sacristies, schools, rectories and other facilities overseen by the diocese.

Airing its dirty laundry, the Diocese of Trenton last year publicly identified 31 former clergy members “credibly accused” of sexual abuse of a minor.

“Anyone who was sexually victimized as a minor by a priest or deacon of the Diocese of Trenton is strongly encouraged to participate in the IVCP,” the diocese says on its website, referring to the New Jersey Independent Victim Compensation Program that compensates eligible victims who were sexually abused while minors by clergy of the Roman Catholic Church.

Baldante says the IVCP initiative is a “thinly veiled effort to settle atrocities cheaply.”

All of Baldante’s clients demand more than $50 million in damages for the sexual abuse they suffered at the hands of former Trenton-area priests.

“When a child is sexually abused they are diminished,” Baldante said. “The humanity is diminished; their self-worth is diminished.”

“This process,” he said of the litigation, “is to really force the church to respect them as a person, to restore the self-esteem, and to restore the humanity.”

The lawsuits
Two of Baldante’s cases highlight the abusive ways of Francis M. McGrath, 69, a former Diocese of Trenton priest at Saint Anthony Catholic Church in Hamilton and an ex-teacher at McCorristin Catholic High School, now known as Trenton Catholic Academy.

McGrath has been credibly accused of sexual abuse on multiple victims and was removed from ministry, according to the diocese’s accountability list.

McGrath previously molested a 17-year-old boy on four separate occasions inside his rectory bedroom at St. Anthony’s in 1983, according to one of the lawsuits, which says the ex-priest exposed his penis and masturbated in front of the victim before fondling the victim and performing oral sex on him.

Known as Father McGrath, the ex-priest in 1978 sexually abused an 11-year-old altar boy on multiple occasions and in multiple venues, including his car and the rectory and sacristy of the church, according to another lawsuit, which says McGrath penetrated the victim’s rectum with his fingers on approximately eight occasions.

Another lawsuit exposes Gregory Vaughan, a former priest at St. Raphael’s in Hamilton and one of the Diocese of Trenton’s ex-clergy members credibly accused of sexual abuse against minors. Before being removed from ministry, Vaughan anally penetrated an 8-year-old altar boy in 1987 on multiple occasions and forced the victim into performing oral sex thereafter, the complaint alleges.

Douglas Hermansen, a former Notre Dame High School chaplain also known as Father Doug, has been credibly accused of sexual abuse on one minor and is newly accused in a lawsuit of sexually abusing a 15-year-old altar boy in 1975 well before becoming an ordained priest in 1979. Hermansen is currently removed from ministry. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Mercer County Superior Court, alleges Hermansen anally penetrated the victim more than 100 times.

Four lawsuits mention the sexual exploits of the late Frank Iazetta, a former Notre Dame High faculty member credibly accused of sexual abuse on multiple victims. Iazetta, who died in 2007, molested minors in the 1970s, including the act of touching and massaging the vagina of a 7-year-old girl in 1975, according to one of the lawsuits.

Two additional lawsuits describe the debauchery of the late Ronald Becker, a former Diocese of Trenton priest credibly accused of sexual abuse on multiple victims. Becker, who died in 2009, targeted boys in the 1970s and ’80s, according to the complaints.

The Trentonian generally does not identify victims of sexual abuse.

A Diocese of Trenton spokesperson had no comment for this story, saying: “We don’t comment on matters of litigation. Thank you.”

Baldante, who represents at least 10 plaintiffs suing the Diocese of Trenton, said the Catholic Church should have known about the widespread sexual abuse on children and should have stopped it well before the 21st century.

“They created this environment,” he said Tuesday in an interview. “The Catholic Church has known for centuries their priests were sexually abusing children and did absolutely nothing to change the situation and protect those children.”

Criminal prosecution
State Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal in September 2018 formed the Clergy Abuse Task Force to investigate allegations of sexual abuse within the Catholic dioceses of New Jersey.

Former priest Thomas P. Ganley, 65, is currently serving a four-year prison sentence at the Central Reception and Assignment Facility after admitting he sexually assaulted a teenage girl in the early 1990s. The Clergy Abuse Task Force secured his guilty plea last year.

Lawrence Township resident Brendan Williams, who appears on the list of credibly accused clergy, has been arrested and charged with second-degree sexual assault last September on allegations he molested an underage girl in the late 1990s.

The New Jersey Clergy Abuse Task Force filed the criminal case against Williams, who has been removed from ministry and formally laicized by the church.

Victims of Catholic Church sex crimes in New Jersey may contact the Clergy Abuse Hotline at (855) 363-6548.




Wyoming bishop accused of abuse won’t be charged

Christopher White Crux Now

Bishop Joseph Hart anoints a newly ordained priest on Thursday, May 11, 2000. Hart, former bishop of Diocese of Cheyenne, Wyo., was accused by multiple men of sexual misconduct while he was a priest in Kansas City. (Credit: Wyoming Tribune via AP.)

NEW YORK - Following a decision by Wyoming prosecutors not to charge retired Bishop Joseph Hart for sexual abuse against minors, his alleged victims are looking to the Church’s canonical process as the last chance for the 88-year-old prelate to be brought to justice. 

As first reported by the Kansas City Star on Tuesday, and confirmed by Crux on Wednesday, a Wyoming witness coordinator informed one of Hart’s accusers that the prosecutor would not advance the case, citing insufficient evidence. This comes nearly two years after the Diocese of Cheyenne deemed the allegations from the same individual to be credible in 2018. 

In a statement on Thursday, Bishop Steven Biegler, the current bishop of Cheyenne, said he stands by the diocese’s determination and noted that Hart’s case is still under review in Rome

“This decision not to pursue a criminal case does not mean that the victims are not credible,” he said. “Once again, I commend the victims who have spoken courageously about their abuse. I also stand behind the determination made by the Diocese of Cheyenne that allegations of sexual abuse against former Bishop Hart are credible.”

Hart, who served as bishop of Cheyenne from 1978-2001, has twice been investigated by the police over abuse-related allegations. The first investigation took place in 2002 but following a two month investigation, a Natrona County prosecutor closed the investigation. A second investigation began in 2018, and in August 2019 the Cheyenne Police Department recommended to prosecutors that charges be made against the bishop.

“Wyoming is unique in that it does not have a statute of limitations, and therefore these crimes, which were committed in the 1970s and 1980s, can still be investigated and prosecuted,” a press release from the police department noted at the time. 

But, only if there is a will to do so.

Following those recommendations, Laramie County District Attorney Leigh Ann Manlove recused herself from the case and forwarded it to Natrona County District Attorney Dan Itzen to serve as a special prosecutor on the case. 

When Crux reached the alleged victim on Wednesday, he said he received a voicemail on Friday from the witness coordinator for Itzen. On Monday, the two connected and he was told that the prosecutor would not bring the case forward.

(It is the policy of Crux not to identify the victims of sexual abuse who do not want to be named.)

The victim told Crux that he found the news “mind-boggling,” citing a conversation with detectives two years ago who assured him that criminal charges would be brought against Hart and even being told that they have “more files on Hart than they possess for double homicide cases.” 

Despite repeated requests, Itzen has declined to speak to the alleged victim to further explain his reasoning not to bring charges. 

“The idea that you could drop the case without speaking to the person who was going to be in the witness stand is outrageous,” he said on Thursday. 

He also said since he came forward, 6 other victims have come forward in Cheyenne with allegations against the retired bishop.   

Prior to being named a bishop, Hart had served in the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph for the first two decades of his priesthood following ordination in 1956. Although his ecclesial career spanned over five decades, serving in two states where he was widely popular, he has been trailed by allegations of serial abuse - which he has consistently denied - dodging both civil and canonical adjudication for more than two decades.

Tom Jubin, a Cheyenne-based attorney for Hart, declined Crux’s request for comment on Thursday. 

A 2019 Crux investigation chronicled accounts of alleged victims in both Missouri and Wyoming who charge that Hart regularly groomed and then abused young men dating back to his earliest days as a priest. As of 2019, the diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph had settled 10 cases of abuse against Hart. 

Upon hearing the news from Cheyenne, Darrel Hunter, who believes he was one of Hart’s earliest victims, told Crux that he believed the decision not to prosecute stems from “a lack of political courage.”

Hunter, who resides in Kansas City, Missouri, is the son of Hart’s long-time secretary, Stella Hunter. Darrel has previously told Crux that he was the victim of misconduct by Hart at age 12, along with his two brothers, Kevin and Mike. 

The Hunter family first approached church officials in 1992 with allegations against Hart and nearly 30 years later, with numerous new complaints against the bishop, he’s dismayed that the prelate has evaded prosecution from civil authorities and a removal from the priesthood by ecclesial authorities. 

Hunter noted that it wasn’t until 2018 with the arrival of the new bishop, James Johnston, who began regularly meeting with the family, that the allegations from the Hunter family were finally deemed as credible. 

During his lengthy tenure in Wyoming, Hart developed a number of ties with state and local officials where even today he is remembered fondly by some area Catholics - a fact that his victims believe has complicated the judicial process with too many conflicts of interest. 

 “The idea that the police recommended charges and they’re still not going to charge him with anything - how is this criminal justice?,” asked one of his accusers in an interview with Crux on Thursday. 

Both he, along with Hunter, said that putting Hart in jail was never their desired goal, noting that given his advanced age, it was unlikely that he would live through the trial and appeals process. Instead, they said they wanted charges brought and a public hearing of their case - one in which they noted that Hart, too, would be given due process. 

Upon being named to Cheyenne in 2017, Biegler was briefed by his predecessor, Archbishop Paul Etienne, now in Seattle, on the history of Hart and informed him that he had written to the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 2010 to alert them of the matter, but the case seemed stalled. Biegler went on to re-open the investigation at a diocesan level and in 2019, Pope Francis green-lighted a penal process against Hart by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. If found guilty, Hart could face removal from the priesthood.  

“The Diocese of Cheyenne is adamant in a sincere quest for justice for everyone. A just resolution is essential for the victims and their family members, but also for the clergy and laity in the Diocese of Cheyenne and the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph’s,” wrote Biegler in his statement Thursday. 

He said that he hopes the district attorney’s office will “offer an adequate account of the reasons for its decision not to pursue criminal charges. This would assist the public in understanding why such a decision was reached,” he said, while also noting that he has not received any updated information from the Vatican on the case. 

For Hart’s accusers, who say that for years, the Church was a roadblock to justice, they now believe this is an opportunity to get things right -  even as they say that civil authorities are failing to hold Hart accountable. 

“I don’t want him to be in a prison cell, but he represents something that’s wrong,” Hunter told Crux. “Now, we’ll have to wait and see what the Vatican says.” 

“Everyone just seems to be waiting around for him to die so that they don’t have to deal with this,” Hart’s victim told Crux on Thursday. “But if the Vatican acts and actually removes him from the priesthood, that would be earthly and heavenly justice.”

No! Heavenly justice will happen regardless of what happens here on earth. He would be far better off to face the truth now, rather than wait until he faces Jesus Christ.