Canadian Convulsions > Covid vax baby deaths - Government cover-up alleged

 

Cover-up alleged in hearing for detective who probed COVID vax baby deaths

A police disciplinary tribunal weighing sanctions against detective Helen Grus for probing a link between COVID vaccines and infant deaths was accused of orchestrating a cover-up.

Juno News

A police disciplinary tribunal weighing sanctions against detective Helen Grus for probing a link between COVID vaccines and infant deaths was accused of orchestrating a cover-up after hearing officer Chris Renwick adjourned a penalty hearing.

The adjournment took place on Thursday, following presentation of voluminous affidavits in support of the embattled 23-year Ottawa Police Service (OPS) veteran.

“(One affidavit) contains government records…that Manitoba (government officials) in July of 2021 raised a concern that there was an increase in spontaneous abortions after the administration of (these drugs on) pregnant and breastfeeding women,” Grus’ lawyer Bath-Sheba van den Berg told Renwick.

“And that's exactly what detective Grus was looking into. There shouldn't even be a charge of discreditable conduct. There shouldn't be a penalty…the tribunal is trying to conceal evidence of criminal negligence.”

Last March, retired OPS superintendent Renwick found Grus guilty of discreditable conduct for her “unauthorized investigation” into a spate of local infant deaths that occurred in 2021 and early 2022. The deaths followed the rollout of novel COVID vaccines, which the government approved for use by pregnant women.

On Wednesday, the litigants gathered at Huntmar Drive police detachment in Stitsville for three days of submissions and testimony in a case that has spanned more than three years since Grus was charged in July of 2022 under the Police Services Act.

But this latest hearing schedule was cut short by Renwick, who sided with OPS prosecutor Jessica Barrow’s objections against proceeding until she could review dozens of reference letters and sworn affidavits, some purportedly asking that the tribunal show leniency towards Grus, others allegedly urging OPS brass to let Grus complete her investigation.

“There's like thousands of pages of documents here and I'm just at a loss as to how do I move forward in fairness to my client,” Barrow told the tribunal.

“In fact, it's not even clear that some of these people know the officer personally. And of course, if they don't then they're not in a position to give character letters.”

Barrow singled out one affidavit, provided by Natasha Gonek, which included 53 attachments contained in two large binders: “Those documents appear, at first glance, to relate to vaccine-related data and records.”

Though Renwick accepted written expert statements provided by Grus’ legal counsel during the examination phase of the tribunal – obtained from several MDs who cited serious safety concerns with the novel COVID vaccines – he denied these doctors an opportunity to provide in-person testimony. They included family physician Gregory Chan, who noted the “lack of safety information” regarding the experimental drugs and that one of his patients suffered a “chronological” stillbirth two months after receiving a COVID vaccine.

Pediatric neurology specialist Dr. Eric Payne was also prevented from testifying, but noted in his expert statement that there was a dearth of safety data on the drugs.

“Pregnant women and babies less than six months of age have been excluded from clinical trials (and) we know that the spike protein product of these genetic vaccines can circulate widely throughout one’s body, including the reproductive organs…(and) has been found to distribute through breastmilk,” he wrote, adding there was “solid scientific and medical support for (Grus’) inquiries.”

While members of the public and media who attended the truncated penalty phase hearing this week were not privy to the contents of mitigating documents presented to the tribunal in support of Grus, True North contacted Gonek, a former investigations officer with the College and Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta.

Gonek told True North she would not speak to her affidavit as it was still before the tribunal, but said before the rollout and during the early stages of the mass vaccination campaign, documents she obtained via access-to-information indicate that government and public health officials were aware the drugs were causing harm and that there was no data for “special interest groups not included in the clinical trials… immunocompromised people, pregnant women, breastfeeding children.”

“They knew (covid vaccines) were showing harm and meeting on these issues very early in February 2021–anaphylaxis was actually one of the big adverse events– and in March of 2021 there's a record of decisions that are just damning in relation to the sheer volume they were seeing in jurisdictions across Canada, especially in British Columbia,” Gonek said of discussions in pan-Canadian vaccine ‘working groups’ that included not only members of the National Advisory Council on Immunization, but RCMP and National Defence.

“These (meetings) all start to line up where the public wasn't being informed of this but discussions (between) people who were decision makers and had the knowledge had occurred. It was their duty to stop these things. They were not doing it.”

In a pandemic career trajectory analogous to Grus’, who was suspended with pay from OPS in January 2022 for refusing to disclose her COVID vaccine status, Gonek said she was let go from the nurses’ college for the same reason.

“I’m one of those,” she said.

Gonek has previously testified about her findings at the National Citizens Inquiry, a publicly funded commission aimed at examining Canada’s response to COVID, and in 2024, she produced a report that Edmonton Police Service knew the novel vaccines were causing harm among its ranks, yet went ahead with a vaccine mandate anyways.

Grus has previously testified that then-OPS chief Peter Sloly and other high-ranking police members were also made aware that Ottawa police members suffered from post-vaccine injuries in December 2021. Grus also testified that criminal negligence could be at play, given public health officials and lawmakers had heralded the COVID injections as safe and effective.

Grus and her legal counsel, however, did score a victory during this week’s hearing as Renwick rejected an anonymous victim impact statement which urged the tribunal to terminate the detective for alleged privacy breaches related to accusations the tribunal found had no merit: that Grus accessed infant death case files without permission.

Before Renwick’s victim-impact-statement decision, Barrow told the tribunal that the prosecution was not recommending termination; rather, her OPS client was seeking a 24-month demotion from 1^st class to 2^nd class constable. Evidence presented at the tribunal indicated that Grus was a stellar investigator with an impeccable record and was being considered for promotion to sergeant.

It remains undetermined when the penalty phase portion of Grus’ disciplinary hearing will resume.

========================================================================

Did the AAP sell their morals and our children's health for a few dollars?

 

How the American Academy of Pediatrics Betrayed Children Everywhere

by: Clayton J. Baker, MD

Robert W Malone MD, MS

Sep 01, 2025

The prime directive of Western medicine, its golden rule, is expressed by the Latin maxim primum non nocere – first, do no harm. Unfortunately, the Covid era taught us that from the patient’s point of view, a better motto for our times might be caveat emptor – let the buyer beware.

Every medical student is taught that, first and foremost, they should not cause harm to their patients, and every doctor is familiar with this maxim. It is echoed in the Hippocratic Oath and forms the basis for the four pillars of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

This rule, and the core tenets of medical ethics that it underpins, were all abandoned during the Covid era. They were replaced with a brutal, inhumane, and unethical martial-law-as-public-health approach to medicine. The results were unconstitutional lockdowns, prolonged school closures, suppression of early treatment, mandated vaccinations, and silencing of dissenting views. These abuses were justified by constant propaganda and lies from public health authorities, the medical establishment, the mainstream media, and medical professional associations.

Enter the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is the largest professional association for pediatricians in the United States. Nearly one hundred years old, the AAP’s motto is “Dedicated to the Health of All Children.” But as with so much of the medical establishment, the Covid era revealed that the AAP has abandoned its stated mission, and in the process, it has betrayed children everywhere.

During the Covid era, no group was harmed more – or more unnecessarily – than children, who lost multiple years of education, socialization, and normal growth and development. Many millions of kids also received the fraudulently tested, toxic, experimental mRNA-based injections that were coercively imposed upon the population at large. Countless children have been harmed or killed by these products, with myocarditis being only the most universally acknowledged of the many toxicities associated with the shots.

Adding insult to injury, it was known from the beginning of the pandemic that the gain-of-function-produced SARS-CoV-2 virus affected children very mildly, rarely causing severe illness, and almost never killing them. Even at the height of the pandemic, an article in the preeminent journal Nature described pediatric Covid deaths as “incredibly rare.” A very large population-based Korean study from 2023 found the case-fatality rate in children from Covid to be well under 1 death in every 100,000 cases.

If no segment of the population was harmed more egregiously than children during the Covid era, few medical organizations betrayed their patient population more thoroughly than the American Academy of Pediatrics.

While the AAP has for many years taken questionable stances on a variety of issues, including the ever-enlarging pediatric vaccine schedule, “gender reassignment,” and others, at one early point during Covid, the AAP did attempt to advocate appropriately in the interest of children. It didn’t last long, however, and a review of this incident shows how the AAP, like so many other medical professional organizations, effectively sold its soul during Covid.

Summer 2020: The AAP Changes Its Tune on In-School LearningFrom mid-March 2020, when the Covid lockdowns began, until the end of that school year in June, most American schoolchildren had been kept completely out of school. On July 9, 2020, the AAP released a statement arguing forcefully for the return of American schoolchildren back:

The AAP strongly advocates that all policy considerations for the coming school year should start with a goal of having students physically present in school. The importance of in-person learning is well-documented, and there is already evidence of the negative impacts on children because of school closures in the spring of 2020.

The July AAP statement went on to say that school closure “places children and adolescents at considerable risk of morbidity and, in some cases, mortality.” It went even further to state that:

the preponderance of evidence indicates that children and adolescents are less likely to be symptomatic and less likely to have severe disease resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, children may be less likely to become infected and to spread infection.

All of these claims the AAP made in July 2020 were known to be true to those who did the proper research (as the AAP apparently had done), and they have been repeatedly and definitively confirmed in the following years.

I was acutely aware of that July 9, 2020, AAP statement. I used it as an important resource in my own advocacy during the summer of 2020 to try to get schools reopened for full-time learning in New York State by the fall. The July AAP document was a well-researched, well-constructed, and well-argued advocacy tool that supported all children’s best interests.

So far, so good. Very soon thereafter, however, the AAP shamefully succumbed to pressure from public health officials, teachers’ unions, and others pushing for continued school closures. By August 19, 2020, with school reopening imminent, the AAP suddenly “revised” their recommendations. The AAP dramatically changed its tune, stating that they would go along with whatever measures public health officials decreed:

…many schools where the virus is widespread will need to adopt virtual lessons and [AAP] is calling for more federal funding to support both models.

“This is on us – the adults – to be doing all the things public health experts are recommending to reduce the spread of the virus,” said AAP President Sara “Sally” H. Goza, M.D., FAAP.

In an act of cowardice and dereliction of duty, the AAP surrendered. It abandoned the strong and sound advocacy for normalizing children’s education contained in its July document. As a physician actively following the issues of the day surrounding Covid and publicly fighting for school reopening, I can testify that nothing changed regarding our knowledge of the virus that justified the AAP’s abdication of its responsibility to children. In fact, multiple foreign countries had already returned children to school without ill effect. The AAP’s capitulation significantly undermined school reopening efforts, especially in Blue states.

The AAP’s sudden and craven volte-face regarding in-school learning was just one of many disgraceful acts committed by medical associations during the Covid era, and it acted to the severe harm of schoolchildren across the nation. Millions of American schoolchildren continued to languish in “remote” or “hybrid” learning for the entire 2020-2021 school year. Many thousands simply dropped out of school, never to return.

In retrospect, the AAP cannot claim that they “didn’t know” enough to push for school reopening. Their July 2020 document proves they knew the correct course of action – before caving in to the establishment’s false narrative, and then subsequently devolving into just one more shameless shill organization, pushing for the mass inoculation of children with the toxic Covid mRNA injections.

Why would the AAP have done such a thing?

Money, for one thing. And plenty of it.

Continue reading this article on Dr. Malone's site at:

The AAP’s Federal Funding Windfall During Covid

=================================================================================