Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!

3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Give Thanks. There is more to this prayer here

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Saturday 31 August 2024

Approaching Sodom > Only one of four judges on NH Supreme Court has any sense - teachers can lie to parents

 

Transgender kids have a right to privacy

from parents, U.S. court rules


The New Hampshire Supreme Court upheld a school district’s policy Friday that aims to support the privacy of transgender students, ruling that a mother who challenged it failed to show it infringed on a fundamental parenting right.



In a 3-1 opinion, the court upheld a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit filed by the mother of a Manchester School District student. She sued after inadvertently discovering her child had asked to be called at school by a name typically associated with a different gender.

At issue is a policy that states in part that “school personnel should not disclose information that may reveal a student’s transgender status or gender nonconfirming presentation to others unless legally required to do so or unless the student has authorized such disclosure.”

In other words, they should flat-out lie to the child's parents! How can that ever be a good thing? It's only far-left, godless people who believe that the ends justify the means, that can justify teaching children to lie.

“By its terms, the policy does not directly implicate a parent’s ability to raise and care for his or her child,” wrote Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald. “We cannot conclude that any interference with parental rights which may result from non-disclosure is of constitutional dimension.

Do you not know, Chief Justice, that secrets and lies between a child and its parents is the beginning of rebellion and the beginning of the end of an effective relationship? This is what you are promoting here for the sake of a completely unscientific and non-sensical ideology. God have mercy on you when you stand before Him.

Senior Associate Justice James Bassett and Justice Patrick Donavan concurred. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Melissa Countway said she believes the policy does interfere with the fundamental right to parent.

Click to play video: '3 unions look to intervene in Sask. government’s appeal of pronoun law challenge'
1:16
3 unions look to intervene in Sask. government’s appeal of pronoun law challenge

“Because accurate information in response to parents’ inquiries about a child’s expressed gender identity is imperative to the parents’ ability to assist and guide their child, I conclude that a school’s withholding of such information implicates the parents’ fundamental right to raise and care for the child,” she wrote.

Neither attorneys for the school district nor the plaintiff responded to phone messages seeking comment Friday. An attorney who filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of a transgender student who supports the policy praised the decision.

Click to play video: 'Parental consent should be required for student pronoun changes: Manitoba Tories'
0:49
Parental consent should be required for student pronoun changes: Manitoba Tories

“We are pleased with the court’s decision to affirm what we already know, that students deserve to be treated with dignity and respect and have a right to freely express who they are without the fear of being forcibly outed,” Henry Klementowicz of the ACLU of New Hampshire said in a statement.

The issue has come up several times in the state Legislature, most recently with a bill that would have required school employees to respond “completely and honestly” to parents asking questions about their children. It passed the Senate but died in the House in May.

“The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the importance of electing people who will support the rights of parents against a public school establishment that thinks it knows more about raising each individual child than parents do,” Senate President Jeb Bradley, a Republican, said in a statement.

Parents also have the right to expect teachers to teach their children that lying is never a good thing, instead of making an example of lying to the people most closely related to you. If you can lie to your parents, you can lie to anyone.




Singapore man frames wife but can't stop talking about it

 

Singapore man sentenced to almost 4 years

for drug possession in scheme to frame wife

Aug. 30 (UPI) -- A Singapore man has been sentenced to 46 months in prison for possessing cannabis he acquired to set up his wife for a potential death sentence that would enable him to get around the city-state's strict divorce requirements and escape from the marriage.

However, 37-year-old Tan Xianglong, was caught on dashcam tampering with her car in October before off-camera gaining access and hiding 1.1 pounds of drugs inside, sufficient to get her the death penalty under Singapore's tough drug trafficking law.

So, I'm wondering why he wasn't charged with attempted manslaughter?

The court heard he had earlier told his then-girlfriend in a social media chat message that he had come up with the "perfect crime" to frame his estranged wife from whom he separated in 2022, a year after they tied the knot.

But unbeknownst to Tan, less than half of the block of cannabis he had purchased from a chat forum on the social media platform Telegram -- weighing it himself to be sure it was at least 1.1 pounds -- was the real thing. Most of it was made up of filler.

"He understood that the involved party would be wrongly arrested and charged with a serious crime if his plan succeeded," the prosecution wrote in court documents.

The penalty for trafficking cannabis in Singapore, defined as selling, smuggling or attempting to smuggle 1.1 pounds or more and just a half ounce for heroin, is a mandatory death sentence and it is imposed on a frequent basis with three people executed in a little more than a week in summer 2023.

After receiving an automated tampering notification from her car, Tan's wife viewed the footage and made a harassment complaint to the police but ended up getting arrested herself after officers checking out the vehicle found 11 packages of drugs hidden between the rear passenger seats.

However, suspicion quickly fell on Tan who was arrested shortly afterward.

Online logs from his social media accounts presented by the court, show Tan telling his girlfriend he had "spent quite a bit on this" and he was pretty sure there would not be a "link back" to him.

Tan and his wife married in 2021 and separated a year later but by 2023 Tan was in debt and irked at his wife for "not contributing much" to the marriage.

He wanted out but was unable to file for divorce because Singapore mandates that couples must wait three years before they can legally end their marriage.

Tan initially hired a private investigator to gather evidence on his wife for grounds for divorce due to adultery but when that was unsuccessful he hatched the plan to frame her for drugs, believing his wife's criminal record -- or worse -- would exempt their case from the waiting period.

The court dismissed mitigation arguments from Tan's counsel that their client was suffering from depression at the time he committed the offenses because medical reports found no sign of a mental health condition.

After admitting to a single charge of cannabis possession, the court sentenced Tan to three years and 10 months, taking into account an additional count of illegal planting of evidence in the sentencing.

I think he got off too easy!



Friday 30 August 2024

Islam Hates Girls and Women and music and beauty > Afghan women sing anyway

 

Afghan women sing in defiance of Taliban

morality laws


Afghan women are raising their voices in song to protest restrictive laws enacted by the Taliban, which ban women from singing and reading aloud in public.

The laws were issued last week by the ministry for the “propagation of virtue and the prevention of vice,” which was established in 2021 after the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan. The 114-page document covers vast aspects of everyday public life, with many notable restrictions on women’s freedoms.

It is now mandatory for women to veil their entire bodies, including their faces, at all times in public to avoid temptation and tempting others. This means that the common Islamic head-covering, the hijab, which covers the hair and neck but not the face, is no longer considered appropriate.

Women are also forbidden from singing, reciting and reading aloud in public, as a woman’s voice is deemed “intimate” and should not be heard. It’s unclear if speaking is also banned.

After the laws were passed, Afghan women both inside and outside the country began posting videos of themselves singing in defiance of the new laws. Some of the videos have gone viral on social media, prompting a wave of others to join the peaceful protest. The lyrics they sing often touch on themes of freedom.

Human Rights Watch researcher Fereshta Abbasi noticed one song in particular being repeated in many protest videos:

Here we are, the women, the world,
Singing freedom like a bird
Rise up, my people,
Rise up, my friend.
Their boots might be on my neck.
Or their fists to my face.
But with our deep light inside
I will fight through this night.

Habib Khan, the founder of Afghan Peace Watch and a former Wall Street Journal reporter, shared multiple videos of Afghan women singing in protest of the laws.

One video shows a woman completely veiled in black singing that a “stamp of silence” has been placed on her mouth and that she has been “imprisoned” in her house for “the crime of being a woman.”

The new laws enacted by the Taliban also forbid women from travelling without a male companion.

Another woman posted a video of herself singing outdoors in Afghanistan, in direct defiance of the Taliban’s morality laws. The 23-year-old graduate told the Associated Press that she refused to be silenced.

“No command, system or man can close the mouth of an Afghan woman,” said the woman, who only provided her last name, Efat.

Efat’s face is barely visible in the 39-second video, which was recorded by her older sister and posted to social media on Tuesday. She wears a dark top, a light blue scarf and sunglasses.

“Because we are in Afghanistan, and the region has less freedom and more fear, if a sound is heard, it will be shut down,” Efat said. “While I was singing, I had the same fear. That if someone heard it, it would be the last time I sang.”

She chose the song because of its message of defiance, protest and strength: “I am not that weak willow that trembles in every wind/I am from Afghanistan/I remember that day when I opened the cage/I took my head out of the cage and sang drunkenly.”

At the end of the video, she says: “A woman’s voice is not intimate.” It’s a direct reference to the Taliban laws and what they say are the reason for a woman’s voice to be concealed outside the home.

“We will remain stronger than before,” she said.

Breaking the Taliban’s morality laws could result in warnings, confiscations of property or detention of up to three days. The ministry has already been enforcing similar morality requirements and says it has detained thousands of people for violations.

“A lot of these rules were in place already but less formally and now they are being formalized. I think this is a sign of what we’ve been seeing over the last three years which is a steady and gradual escalation of the crackdown,” said Heather Barr, associate director of Human Rights Watch’s women’s rights division.

Apart from the new restrictions on women, the laws passed on Wednesday also ban the playing of music and bar men from shaving their beards as well as skipping prayer and religious fasts. As well, women cannot look at men they are not related to by blood or marriage and vice versa.

The new laws come after the Taliban already placed harsh restrictions on women’s freedoms after the takeover. In 2022, the group banned women from attending school after the sixth grade, when previously, women could attend high schools and universities. Women are also banned from working at non-governmental organizations.

— With files from The Associated Press



Child abuse and sex abuse on the internet > Deepfake sex crime victims 60% children; TikTok sued in blackout challenge death of 10 y/o

 

It's been obvious for many years now that any new app, platform, or program that comes out is mastered by perverts before anyone else, and consequently, they are there waiting for our children to arrive. South Korean police have just confirmed this.


Some 60% of deepfake sex crime victims in South Korea

are minors, police say

By Thomas Maresca

SEOUL, Aug. 30 (UPI) -- As South Korea faces a sprawling deepfake sex crime scandal, police data released Friday revealed that nearly six out of 10 victims were minors.


Local media reports detailing the spread of fake, AI-generated pornographic images of ordinary women and girls, hosted in chat rooms on the Telegram messaging app, have sent shockwaves across the country in recent days.

Many of the chat rooms -- one of which was found to have over 220,000 members by South Korean newspaper Hankyoreh -- are based at universities and high schools, and target students and teachers.

The crime has turned out to be alarmingly widespread. A survey of students, teachers and staff at K-12 schools by the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union released Thursday found that more than 20% of respondents said that they were either direct or indirect victims of deepfake pornography.

The number of reported deepfake cases has soared this year, from 156 in 2021 to 297 cases as of July this year, according to the National Police Agency, which announced an intensive effort to track and arrest deepfake creators and distributors on Tuesday.

According to data submitted Friday by the police agency to Rep. Yang Boo-nam of the Democratic Party of Korea, 315 out of the 527 victims -- or 59.8% -- in reported cases between 2021 and 2023 were teenagers.

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol called on authorities this week to step up efforts to combat the crimes.

"Deepfake videos may be dismissed as mere pranks, but they are clearly criminal acts that exploit technology under the shield of anonymity," Yoon said during a Cabinet meeting Tuesday. "Anyone can be a victim of such digital sex crimes."

The scandal has emerged as Telegram's billionaire founder and CEO Pavel Durov was arrested and indicted this week by French authorities for allegedly permitting criminal activity on the app, including drug trafficking, child sexual content and fraud.

The Korea Communications Standards Commission, the country's media regulator, announced this week that it plans to set up a round-the-clock hotline with Telegram to monitor and delete deepfake videos and has asked French authorities for regular cooperation.

Women's rights groups, however, have criticized the lack of government response to digital sex crimes that have been rampant for years in South Korea.

In 2019, another Telegram-based digital sex scandal drew widespread outrage. The so-called "Nth room" case involved criminals blackmailing girls into sharing sex videos, with many victims being underage.

The outcry over that case followed mass protests in 2018 against a spycam epidemic in South Korea, in which secret videos taken from public restrooms, changing rooms, subways and buses were widely sold and shared online. And 2019's Burning Sun scandal, in which K-pop stars and other powerful figures were implicated in charges of rape and hidden sex videos, further inflamed public sentiment.

"In a society that does not properly punish or prevent crimes and violence against women, we are literally living without a state, without a sense of safety in our daily lives," Korean women's rights group Womenlink said in a statement Monday.

"With the advancement of technology, the patterns of crime are diversifying," the statement said. "Can a society survive in which the daily safety of millions of its members is threatened? This is a state of national emergency."

Heather Barr, associate director of the Women's Rights Division at Human Rights Watch, said that digital sex crimes in South Korea are causing lingering trauma for victims, even driving some to suicide.



TikTok faces lawsuit over ‘blackout challenge’ death of 10-year-old girl


By Maryclaire Dale 

 2 min read

A U.S. appeals court revived on Tuesday a lawsuit filed by the mother of a 10-year-old Pennsylvania girl who died attempting a viral challenge she allegedly saw on TikTok that dared people to choke themselves until they lost consciousness.

While federal law generally protects online publishers from liability for content posted by others, the court said TikTok could potentially be found liable for promoting the content or using an algorithm to steer it to children.

“TikTok makes choices about the content recommended and promoted to specific users, and by doing so, is engaged in its own first-party speech,” Judge Patty Shwartz of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court in Philadelphia wrote in the opinion issued Tuesday.

Lawyers for TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, did not immediately return phone and email messages seeking comment.

Lawyers for the mother, Tawainna Anderson, had argued that the so-called “blackout challenge,” which was popular in 2021, appeared on Nylah Anderson’s “For You” feed after TikTok determined that she might watch it — even after other children had died trying it.

Tawainna Anderson holds a photo of her daughter Nylah, in a meeting to urge Congress to pass legislation to keep kids safe online on Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2022 in Washington. Eric Kayne/AP Images for ParentsTogether Action

Nylah Anderson’s mother found her unresponsive in the closet of their home in Chester, near Philadelphia, and tried to resuscitate her. The girl, described by her family as a fun-loving “butterfly,” died five days later.

“I cannot stop replaying that day in my head,” her mother said at a news conference in 2022, when she filed the lawsuit. “It is time that these dangerous challenges come to an end so that other families don’t experience the heartbreak we live every day.”

A district judge initially dismissed the lawsuit, citing Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which is often used to protect internet companies from liability for things posted on their sites.

Nylah Anderson, who died attempting the viral TikTok "blackout challenge."
Nylah Anderson, who died attempting the viral TikTok “blackout challenge.” Tawainna Anderson (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA)


The three-judge appeals court panel partially reversed that decision Tuesday, sending the case back to the lower court for trial.

“Nylah, still in the first year of her adolescence, likely had no idea what she was doing or that following along with the images on her screen would kill her. But TikTok knew that Nylah would watch because the company’s customized algorithm placed the videos on her ‘For You Page,’” Judge Paul Matey wrote in a partial concurrence to the opinion.

Jeffrey Goodman, a lawyer for the family, said it’s “inevitable” that courts give Section 230 more scrutiny as technology reaches into all facets of our lives. He said the family hopes the ruling will help protect others, even if it doesn’t bring Nylah Anderson back.

“Today’s opinion is the clearest statement to date that Section 230 does not provide this catchall protection that the social media companies have been claiming it does,” Goodman said.