Everyday thousands of children are being sexually abused. You can stop the abuse of at least one child by simply praying. You can possibly stop the abuse of thousands of children by forwarding the link in First Time Visitor? by email, Twitter or Facebook to every Christian you know. Save a child or lots of children!!!! Do Something, please!

3:15 PM prayer in brief:
Pray for God to stop 1 child from being molested today.
Pray for God to stop 1 child molestation happening now.
Pray for God to rescue 1 child from sexual slavery.
Pray for God to save 1 girl from genital circumcision.
Pray for God to stop 1 girl from becoming a child-bride.
If you have the faith pray for 100 children rather than one.
Give Thanks. There is more to this prayer here

Please note: All my writings and comments appear in bold italics in this colour

Showing posts with label sex-ed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex-ed. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 April 2021

Positive Stories in the War on Child Sexual Abuse > 2 Stories from Alabama and One from Arkansas - Banning PP from Sex-Ed

..
Teaching Kids to Prevent Abuse: Children’s Teams Up With Schools
on Virtual Child Abuse Prevention Lessons
April 21, 2021

The staff at the CHIPS Center has adapted their child sexual abuse prevention program to a virtual format in order to continue to serve local schools. Photo courtesy Children’s of Alabama.

By Emily Williams-Robertshaw

April is National Child Abuse Prevention Month.

It’s an issue that is closer to home than anyone wants to think and, according to the Children’s Hospital Intervention and Prevention Services Center at Children’s of Alabama, the pandemic may be making it worse.

Research shows that increased stress levels among parents is a significant predictor for physical abuse and child neglect. With COVID-19 resulting in financial and health-related stress, an abusive parent may place the brunt of their aggression on their children, who have been at home more often than in a typical school year.

The CHIPS center has served as an outpatient clinic where children who have experienced abuse and their families could seek refuge since 1995. But their work goes beyond their clinic walls.

When it comes to identifying the characteristics that signify abuse, teachers and fellow classmates often are the sources who point to potential problems. Sometimes that abuse is of a sexual nature.

In 2016, the Legislature passed Erin’s Law, which requires schools to provide age-appropriate lessons to educate kids on child sexual abuse prevention.

“We’ve been working with Homewood City Schools since Erin’s Law was passed,” said Deb Schneider, director of the CHIPS Center. “Homewood was our first school that we went into after the law was passed.”

Schneider has a long history of working with many schools in the area, especially as students have been found to be in distress.

Homewood City Schools Prevention and Development Coordinator Carissa Anthony notes that the CHIPS team always has been professional when it came to teaching kids hard subjects in an interactive and appropriate way.

“Their lessons are always so interactive and well-received by the students,” Anthony said. “They are well-received by teachers, and I have even heard from some parents who said that the lessons sparked great conversations at home.”

Adapting During a Pandemic

When the pandemic hit, the CHIPS staff was unable to visit schools and provide their essential lessons. They had to adapt.

“Our IT department helped us do a Zoom presentation to a school in Pickens County, and then they saw the need for us to be able to keep doing this in the future,” Schneider said.

So, the staff reached out to Anthony and began working on a standard for virtual presentations.

“I could not be more pleased, especially at the elementary level,” Anthony said. “You know, in a normal classroom setting, only one or two kids will respond, but all of the kids were getting involved and every child was having their voice heard.”

The students responded very well, with the CHIPS representatives allowing them to interact through the screen with hand signals, Anthony said. The CHIPS team also is well versed in making the subject approachable in a way that isn’t overly frightening to kids.

“It can be scary,” Anthony said. “It can be two things: it can be so scary and it can be silly, because you are talking about body parts and it’s funny. It elicits strong emotions either way.”

Anthony has sat in on multiple lessons and found that the format has allowed teachers to take on a more active role in the lesson. “This gives teachers the same language that the CHIPS representatives use,” Anthony said. “Now they have a common way of talking about this.”

It’s not an easy subject to discuss in the home, Schneider said. “Parents can’t just say something to their child one time and think that they have understood it,” Schneider said.

“We have an entire facility here at Children’s that is dedicated to this issue and treating children who are victims of abuse,” Schneider said.

It’s a hard reality, but a reality, nonetheless, that child abuse is not alien or uncommon.

“The best thing we can do for children is help them understand that that is wrong, number one; and that that adult is the one that’s wrong,” Anthony said. “The child is never wrong. To understand that and to equip them with a plan of what they can do if someone tries to hurt them in some way or someone does hurt them in some way, how they can find their voice and get help,” is the mission, she said.

Taking the Work Home

For Anthony, helping the CHIPS team is something that goes beyond her desk.

Her daughters have been getting involved, helping put together packets to be sent to schools in preparation for CHIPS lessons.

“It started out because I needed help for Homewood schools,” Anthony said. “I knew Deb and her team were overrun and I knew I needed kits to be put together for Homewood, so I wanted to help.

“If they are spending time putting kits together, they aren’t spending that time helping children. So, we can take this on.”

Anthony’s Berry Middle School seventh grader, Morgan, and Spain Park freshman, Maddie, have set up an assembly line at home to help get the job done. It’s also a bit nostalgic for her daughters.

They didn’t get the same lessons in elementary school, but Anthony used to read them the books the facility provided for her Homewood lessons.

“They would say, ‘We remember you reading these books to us,” and it grew from there and sparked good conversations with them,” Anthony said. “They have both had situations where their friends told them some things and they had to help them. They knew what to do from us reading those little books and talking.”




Arkansas Legislature Passes Bill Banning Planned Parenthood From Providing Sex Ed Programs to Schools
April 21, 2021

On Monday, the Arkansas state Senate passed a measure prohibiting Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers from providing sex ed programs to public schools.


The bill now heads to Republican Governor Asa Hutchinson’s desk. His office has not yet indicated if he will sign it either way, as of this writing, and declined to comment to the AP.

The Associated Press reports that the Senate voted 27-5 to prohibit schools from entering into transactions with any entity that performs, induces, or provides abortions.

“If the entity does that, I think the state of Arkansas has no business in any form…contracting with them to do anything,” said Republican Sen. Bob Ballinger, one of the bill’s sponsors.

Many Americans may not realize that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in the United States, also has extensive influence in the public school system by way of providing sexual education curricula heavily favoring their ideological agenda.

The abortion giant uses the controversial Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), which introduces children to a wide variety of sexual identities, lifestyles, acts, fetishes, as well as perspectives on gender identity heavily promoting gender theory (gender fluidity).

Earlier this year, the deeply culturally conservative state passed a near-total ban on abortion, which Hutchinson signed. Arkansas’ legislature has also passed a number of bills preserving conservative values, such as a ban on the enforcement of federal gun laws, a ban on biological males participating in transgender sports, and a ban on gender identity-affirming treatments for minors (which Hutchinson vetoed despite the legislature having the votes to override).

Planned Parenthood was certainly not pleased with the legislation, which would prohibit them from entering into contracts with Arkansas’ public schools.

“Our students’ basic education should not be jeopardized because of the Legislature’s misguided political agenda,” Gloria Pedro, the regional manager on public policy and organizing for Arkansas and Oklahoma for Planned Parenthood Great Plains Votes, according to AP.

Many might argue that “basic education” need not involve highly ideological and X-rated sexual content produced by a for-profit provider of abortion and that there is a wealth of alternate educational material to choose from elsewhere, of course.




Transphobic or a victory for common sense? Alabama bans ‘biological males’ from playing on female school sports teams
25 Apr, 2021 12:56

©  Getty Images/AFP/Butch Dill

Alabama has adopted a new law that bars public schools from allowing transgender girls to participate in female sports, rekindling debate about the controversial measure, which has been embraced by other conservative states.

The bill, HB 391, states that public K-12 schools “may never allow a biological male to participate on a female team.” Sponsored by Republican state Rep. Scott Stadthagen, the law passed both houses of the legislature without difficulty before being signed off by Governor Kay Ivey on Friday.

In a statement, Stadthagen thanked the governor for “protecting the rights of Alabama’s female athletes,” adding that “standing up for what is right is not always easy, but it is always the right thing to do.”

Proponents of the legislation argue that transgender girls have physiological advantages in competition, making their participation in female sports unfair. State lawmakers who backed the bill said it was necessary to maintain the “integrity” of female athletic programs. 

But critics insisted that the law was exclusionary and addresses a problem that doesn’t exist. LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign said the law was “politically motivated” and “designed to discriminate against an already vulnerable population.”

The group’s Alabama state director, Carmarion D. Harvey-Anderson, claimed the bill was based on “lies and misinformation,” adding that transgender youth have been playing sports “consistent with their gender identity for years without incident on the collegiate and professional level.” The rule will result in expensive taxpayer-funded legal battles and harm the state’s reputation, the organization predicted.

Reactions were also split on social media. Many seemed to view the law as uncontroversial and necessary. One commenter argued that those who were upset over the rule didn’t understand that biological males have attributes that give them an unfair edge over female athletes. 

Girls have a right to “fair competition,” and transgender athletes should form their own teams, said another supporter of the measure. 

“There are no restrictions. Everyone can play sports according to their actual genders. No restrictions,” wrote one person who seemed frustrated over the controversy. 

But there were plenty of others who saw the issue differently. Twitter users accused Republicans of spreading “hate and fear,” with one commenter wondering if the GOP was holding a contest to see “who can alienate the most voters.”

Republican legislators across the country have introduced bills that would restrict transgender girls from playing on female sports teams. Last month, Mississippi’s Republican governor, Jonathon Tate Reeves, signed a bill that bars trans athletes from competing on girls’ or women’s sports teams. Idaho last year became the first state to institute such restrictions, but the law is currently being challenged in court. 

At the same time, there are also states that have rejected the move. On Thursday, Kansas’ Democratic governor, Laura Kelly, vetoed a similar bill, claiming it would harm children. 

The Republican governors of North and South Dakota have also shot down legislation that bars transgender youth from joining female sports teams.



Friday, 16 April 2021

Positive Stories in the War on Rape and Child Sex Abuse - Pakistan's New Laws; EU's New 5-Year Plan; France - Age of Consent; Arizona Sex-Ed

..
Prime Minister Imran Khan’s government’s Anti-Rape Ordinance 2020
..
I am inspired by Imran Khan’s consistent stance on the rule of law: Bokhari

Published:  April 11, 2021 10:14
Mehr Tarar, Special to Gulf News

Minister Farogh Naseem and Barrister Maleeka Bokhari

In January 2018, the rape and murder of the six-year-old Zainab Ansari unleashed waves of grief, horror and anger across Pakistan. Reports of more rapes and murders of children continued to appear. The helpless pain and rage continued to simmer.

Zainab Ansari

In March 2020, the Zainab Alert, Recovery and Response Bill was passed in the National Assembly.

The September 2020 gang rape of a woman stranded on Sialkot-Lahore motorway shook Pakistan from its apathetic stance on sexual violence against women. The woman who was beaten and raped in front of her children became the tragic rallying sign for the imperativeness of steps for prevention of rape and certainty of punishment.

In December 2020, Prime Minister Imran Khan’s government’s landmark bill for protection of rights of victims and survivors of sexual violence, sexual abuse and rape and the certainty of punishment titled the Anti-Rape (Investigation & Trial) Ordinance, 2020 was approved by President of Pakistan Dr Arif Alvi. Also approved was an amendment in the Pakistan Penal Code, titled Criminal law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020.

The Anti-Rape (Investigation & Trial) Ordinance, 2020, and Criminal law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, when implemented in their true letter and spirit, will be the game-changing legislation for dispensation of justice to all victims of sexual violence or rape.

Barrister Maleeka Bokhari is the chairperson for the Special Committee on Implementation of the Anti-Rape (Investigation & Trial) Ordinance, 2020.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s Member of National Assembly Barrister Maleeka Bokhari is known for her articulate and fiery defence of her government on prime time talk shows. What Bokhari, as visible in her tweets, is also known for is her constant stance of equality and equal opportunities for women.

Bokhari since 2012 has given legal advice to her party. She is also part of the team of lawyers in some key PTI cases, including the Panama case, and the Judicial Commission on General Elections 2013. Bokhari says, “I am inspired by Imran Khan’s consistent stance on the rule of law, in particular, his stance of equal application of the law irrespective of social status and class.”

As the Parliamentary Secretary for Law and Justice, Bokhari represents the Ministry of Law and Justice in parliament; her principal responsibility is to respond to all questions and legislative business in parliament. Bokhari in a question about her work says, “I was responsible for the passage of the Islamabad High Court Amendment Bill, and I was part of the team that got the FATF laws passed in September 2020. I have also been part of the team that drafted the Legal Aid and Justice Authority Act 2019, Enforcement of Women’s Property Rights Act 2019, and the Letters of Administration and Succession certificates Act 2019.”

An interview with Maleeka Bokhari follows on Gulf News...




EU unveils 5-year plan to fight human trafficking, fraud, online predators
By Clyde Hughes

The EU strategy includes criminalizing services that take advantage of trafficking victims, eliminate ways criminals use the Internet to make money for those services and improve assistance to potential victims. File Photo by symbiot/Shutterstock/UPI

April 14 (UPI) -- The European Union on Wednesday announced a five-year plan to expand policing and fight organized crime that's involved with human trafficking, fraud and cybercrime.

The European Commission outlined the plan, which seeks to nab high-level offenders for crimes like human trafficking, money laundering and fraud related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The commission said human trafficking nets about $35 billion per year and the coronavirus pandemic and more sophistication online has made it more difficult to fight.

"Fighting trafficking in human beings is part of our work toward building a Europe that protects," Margaritis Schinas, vice president of Promoting Our European Way of Life, said in a statement.

"We are taking a three-pronged approach, using legislation, policy and operational support and funding in tandem to reduce demand, break the criminal business and empower victims of this abominable crime."

The report said 60% of repatriated victims of human trafficking in the EU in 2017 and 2018 were involved in sexual exploitation. Another 15% involved labor exploitation. It also noted that women and girls made up 72% of exploited victims.

The new strategy includes criminalizing services that take advantage of trafficking victims, eliminate ways criminals use the Internet to make money for those services and improve assistance to potential victims.

"Trafficking in human beings is a crime that should have no place in our societies," EU Home Affairs Commissioner Ylva Johansson said.

"We owe the victims protection, and we need to bring to justice the perpetrators who treat human beings as a commodity."

And will you be working with the various web-hosting services and social media platforms, or against them?




France finally outlaws sex with children under 15 after Duhamel-Kouchner incest scandal reignites age-of-consent debate
16 Apr, 2021 05:36 

FILE PHOTO ©  Reuters / Pascal Rossignol

French lawmakers have adopted a law cracking down on sex with children and incest, following a social media firestorm touched off by allegations of incestuous abuse against a prominent intellectual earlier this year.

The Assemblee Nationale voted unanimously on Thursday to set the age of consent at 15, classifying sex with children under that age – as well as incestuous sex with anyone under 18 – as rape, punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

“This is a historic law for our children and our society,” Justice Minister Eric Dupond-Moretti told lawmakers, adding that it sends a clear message that “children are off-limits.”

The law also includes tougher penalties on internet pedophilia, with anyone caught grooming children under 15 online facing 10 years in prison and a €150,000 (approximately $180,000) fine. Previously, French prosecutors could only bring charges of rape or sexual assault if they could prove an adult forced, threatened or tricked a minor into sex.  

The new law did carve out an exemption for consensual relations between a minor and a young adult up to five years older – a so-called 'Romeo and Juliet' clause, named after the teens in William Shakespeare’s famous tragedy. Dupond-Moretti defended its inclusion, saying he did not want “to put a youth of 18 on trial because he had consensual sex with a girl aged fourteen-and-a-half.”

A previous attempt by French lawmakers to set the age of consent floundered in 2018. It was inspired by the case of a 28-year-old who was caught having sex with an 11-year-old girl, but was initially not charged with rape. The new law was driven in part by a book published in January this year, however.

In ‘La Familia Grande’, Camille Kouchner accused her stepfather Olivier Duhamel of having abused her twin brother for years, starting when he was 14. She also claimed her mother’s “leftist intellectual friends” – as France24 put it – knew about the abuse, but kept it quiet. The conspiracy of silence apparently included her own father, former foreign minister and Doctors Without Borders (MSF) co-founder Bernard Kouchner. 


Duhamel, a prominent political scientist and TV pundit, has since resigned from public life. Earlier this week, French media reported he had confessed to the abuse to police.

Kouchner’s book prompted a Twitter user to publish their own accusation of incestuous abuse with a hashtag #MeTooInceste, which has since gone viral in France.




Several Republican states have been pushing back against the LGBTQ influence in school systems which attempt to cut parents' authority in deciding what is healthy education for their children.


Controversial bill in Arizona may give control of sex-ed
back into the hands of parents
16 Apr, 2021 15:31

FILE PHOTO © Reuters / Gleb Garanich

Arizona Governor Doug Ducey is deciding whether to sign a bill requiring parents to opt in to classes teaching their children about “gender identity” and “sexual orientation.” Opponents say the bill is anti-LGBT.

Protesters gathered outside the Heard Museum in Phoenix, Arizona, on Thursday, demanding Ducey veto a controversial sex education bill passed this week by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature. SB 1456 would allow parents to review the state’s sex education curriculum and opt out of having their children learn about “gender identity or gender expression,” HIV and AIDS or “sexual orientation.” 

The opt-in would extend beyond sex education classes and into any subject touching on these issues – for example a history class discussing homosexuality in ancient Greece, or the 1969 Stonewall Riots, considered the start of the ‘gay liberation’ movement.

Liberal parents at the protest told Fox 10 that the bill would “harm” LGBT kids and make them feel unwelcome in school. Democrats in the state have vocally opposed the bill too, with the Democratic minority in the state Senate claiming it would “further push already marginalized people from resources,” and progressive activist Alison Macklin describing it to AP as “a subliminal way of trying to get anti-homosexual legislation put in, by saying you can’t speak or talk about it in schools.”

Yet, like all hot-button culture-war issues in the US, opposition is split along ideological lines. Proponents of the Republican-sponsored bill argue that it gives parents oversight over what liberal teachers tell their children in the classroom. 

“It is the parent, not the school, that has the ultimate responsibility for guarding the education, health, safety and well-being of their child,” state Senator Nancy Bardo (R) told Fox 10. “[The bill] solely protects a parent’s right to decide when their child is ready for and what their child is exposed to regarding sexual materials at school.”

Arizona is one of five states that already requires parents’ permission before their child attends sex education classes. The new bill would give parents an extra brake, and would require them to opt in twice for their children to receive the full, “gender identity” and all, sex education suite.

Debate over the bill is fierce in a purple state like Arizona, which in 2019 struck down a law that banned any sex education teaching that portrayed homosexuality in a positive light. While Arizona was since the late 1990s a reliable Republican stronghold (no Democrat won a single statewide election there between 2008 and 2018, from gubernatorial races to education board battles), the state narrowly elected Joe Biden in 2020, and a combination of demographic change and suburban voters drifting left has made it more difficult to pass conservative laws in Arizona.

In more reliably red states, legislatures are busy passing similar laws to SB 1456. Idaho passed an almost identical bill last month, which now awaits Governor Brad Little’s signature. Tennessee passed a similar bill this week, which is now making its way to Governor Bill Lee for approval. Montana passed a bill this month that was amended from an opt-in to an opt-out system after complaints from teachers, and Missouri too is considering the opt-in system.

All of these legislative actions fit into a broader Republican pushback against the perceived encroachment of LGBT and transgender ideology in schools. Numerous states have passed laws preventing transgender women from competing against biological women in school and college athletics, while others have moved to forbid doctors from helping minors change their gender.




Thursday, 17 March 2016

Teachers Abuse 100 Times More Than Priests, But We Trust Them with Sex Ed?

Are teachers more trustworthy sex educators than parents? 

Featured Image


TORONTO, ONTARIO - (LifeSiteNews)
Though governments argue that teaching sex ed in schools is about student safety, one leading anti-sex-ed activist recently warned parents that it can actually put kids’ safety at risk. Many parents strongly object to government schools stepping in on such an intimate and personal matter. But is there also good reason for parents to distrust teachers’ motives in the classroom?

“As the sex-ed lessons start to be rolled out in classrooms across Ontario, parents need to critically evaluate the claim, repeatedly made by Premier Kathleen Wynne, that teachers are more trustworthy than parents to give sex education lessons,” Jack Fonseca of Campaign Life Coalition told LifeSiteNews.

Fonseca laid out his concerns about teachers providing students with explicit sex-ed in a meeting with concerned parents last September at the Thorncliffe Park Library Community Centre in East York.

“If you read the papers, there are just so many cases of teachers having inappropriate sexual contact with children. How are parents to know which teachers are the sexual predators? I'm not saying that all teachers are sexual predators by any means, but there is a problem in the education industry,” he said.

“If the teacher is attracted to children, won't these explicit [sex-ed] lessons risk arousing the teacher sexually?” he added.

A brief search through the news of sexual assaults by Ontario teachers in 2016 alone brings up disturbing results:

London, On, January 06 – Teacher Roger Reid is charged and arrested for inappropriately touching a female student. 
Stirling, February 15 – Teacher Jaclyn McLaren, 36, is charged and arrested for 36 counts of sexual abuse with children, including sexual assault, sexual touching, and making child pornography. 
Toronto, February 18 – 30-year-old teacher Anthony Cuccione is charged and arrested with five counts of sexual assault after several students came forward to report “inappropriate sexual touching.”
Niagara Falls, March 7 – Teacher Michael J. Molnar faces numerous sex-related charges from incidents involving two female students, including  two counts of sexual assault, sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching, and sexual exploitation.

The sex-ed curriculum has discussions of genitalia and sexual consent in Grade 1, homosexuality and gender theory in Grade 3, masturbation in Grade 6, oral and anal penetration in Grade 7, and making a personal sexual plan by Grade 8. 

Unbelievable! 

An active Catholic teacher in Ontario told LifeSiteNews, under condition of anonymity, that student sexual abuse by teachers is more rampant than parents realize. 

“We get a monthly magazine from the College of Teachers called “Professionally Speaking.” In the magazine there is a section that everyone calls the “Blue Pages” in which are published the reports of teachers who have been disciplined or convicted of various crimes.” 

“Almost every case that is discussed in the Blue Pages is about sexual assault or sexual deviancy. You see cases of female teachers assaulting male students, and sometimes female students. And you see male teachers assaulting female students, and sometimes male students. It’s unbelievable what is in there. It’s disgusting,” the teacher said.

In the March issue alone there were four cases of teachers convicted of being involved sexually with students, included teachers who possessed child pornography, and one male teacher who was convicted for the “sexual touching of four girls.”

“We all turn to it. It’s the first thing teachers go to when the magazine comes in. It’s like the ‘National Enquirer’ of teachers,” the teacher added.

The teacher said that there should be little doubt in the minds of parents that the sex-ed curriculum will become an occasion for more teachers to “act out sexually with students.” 

Sunday, 13 September 2015

Ontario School's Social Engineering Part of LGBTQ War on Christianity

In China, when you rebel against the Communist Party line, you may be re-orientated into communist ideology. Re-orientation means you are tortured and brainwashed until you either accept the party line or you are mentally destroyed. The 'party line' comes from communist paranoia that all religion is a form of western invasion intended to destroy China.

Ontario's Ministry of Education is pushing its party line onto school children, and in so doing is undermining the role of Christianity in the lives of Ontario children. This experiment in social engineering is no less than a war against Christian interpretations of sin, and indeed, against Christianity itself.

Ontario's lesbian Premier, Kathleen Wynne, is one of the motivating forces behind this agenda. Gays seem to need to justify their homosexuality, or, at least to remove the guilt and shame of thumbing their noses at God by eliminating God. So the idea is to undermine the basic principles of sin and thereby set Christian children against their parents, the consequence of which should be the complete destruction of the Christian faith.

That this is an exercise in social engineering rather than an exercise in improving the lives of school children and the next generation of adults is obvious. Perhaps one in one hundred children in schools may be bullied because of their sexual orientation. But we know that one in 4 or one in 5 girls and one in 10-12 boys will be sexually abused before they turn 18 - a problem that is exponentially more prevalent than sexual orientation discrimination. 

The consequences of child sex abuse are extraordinary and profound, and for a high percentage of victims - last a lifetime. Pedophilia is an immense problem in every society and the schools in Ontario are not even addressing the issue. And it is so easy to address: teach elementary school children what is safe and unsafe touch; teach them what are good and bad secrets; teach them who to tell and how to tell someone about violations of touch and secrecy. 

Teaching children from the earliest grades age-appropriate methods of identifying and reporting pedophilia could easily save thousands of children from sexual abuse or further sexual abuse and the devastating consequences thereof. But instead of doing that, Ontario teachers are busy making comfortable those who wish to experiment with gender fluidity and other unfortunate adventures.

For more on saving children from pedophilia see Erin's Law.

Ontario schools face a potential logistical nightmare over sex-ed protests
By Aleksandra Sagan, 
CBC News 
Hundreds of parents protested outside Toronto's Thorncliffe Park Public School
to express their opposition to Ontario's new sex-ed curriculum. (CBC)
It may have been back to school for many students this week, but some Ontario classrooms were a little emptier than usual.

The dispute between the Ontario Ministry of Education and parents over the new sex-education curriculum is keeping some students out of class, and teachers and principals are caught in the middle.

About half of Toronto's Thorncliffe Park Public school's students sat at desks in their classrooms on Tuesday morning. Meanwhile, roughly half of their classmates remained home as their parents protest a controversial new sex-ed curriculum.

Most of the disputed parts of Ontario's revised health and physical education curriculum — like Grade 1 students correctly identifying genitalia or  Grade 8 students learning about gender identity and sexual orientation — make up only a handful of lessons.

Still, numerous concerned parents have formed coalitions and some have threatened to remove their children from school permanently.

Some want the government to revert to its previous 1998 curriculum, which experts deem outdated; while others say they could accept a new version if certain aspects are omitted and others tweaked.

Who are these experts? Are they like former government official and university professor Benjamin Levin, who is currently sitting in prison because of child pornography charges?

"We're not even against sex ed in schools," says John Himanen, the director of communications for Parents Alliance of Ontario. "I'm all for it, actually. But I want it to be done right."

The alliance argues the revised curriculum has some age-inappropriate material and factual errors, and says the government did not properly consult with parents.

Himanen has three daughters at a Markham elementary school. He hopes Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and the province's Minister of Education Liz Sandals will work with parents to adjust the curriculum. At the very least, he and his wife plan to meet with their daughters' teachers to learn how they intend to deliver the material before deciding if their daughters need to miss any of those lessons.

If none of these strategies work, he's willing to consider alternatives, like home or private school — similar to tactics other opponents have suggested and even used.

Opponents of the new Ontario sex-ed curriculum have held protests, such as
this Feb. 24 demonstration at Queen's Park in Toronto.
(Darren Calabrese/Canadian Press)
Belief-based exemptions possible

This conflict could create a logistical nightmare for Ontario schools. They are obligated to teach students about the birds and the bees, but want to avoid a mass student exodus as part of a prolonged protest or on the days teachers devote class time to sex education.

In many Ontario schools, parents can request special treatment for religious or personal convictions, including missing class for holidays. Parents can also make a request to the school that their child miss certain parts of the new sex-ed curriculum, wrote Gary Wheeler, the Ontario Ministry of Education's senior media relations co-ordinator.

The ministry has instructed boards to "respectfully and sensitively" deal with parental concerns, he said.

"School boards are expected to consider requests for accommodation on a case-by-case basis within the board's existing policies."

We cannot — we will not — by action or inaction endorse discrimination.
- Tony Pontes, PDSB director of education

Wheeler did not say whether the ministry provides boards with guidance with regard to shaping those policies. However, Peel District School Board (PDSB) asked the ministry for clarification on the opt out process and "they are not providing it," wrote the board's director of communications and community relations Brian Woodland in an email.

Some school administrators have expressed concern that many parents in their communities will request permission for their kids to miss sex-ed classes, which could pose problems in terms of supervision.

In Halton District School Board (HDSB), most schools reported few absences during parent protests in the spring, according to the district's superintendent of education, Patricia Dyson. But a handful of larger schools had more than 100 students absent, she said.

Human rights trumps religious beliefs

Applications for exemptions could also create administrative overhead and friction between parents and school officials. Generally, schools require parents to write a letter to the principal and then attend a meeting before administrators determine if a student can miss the class without penalty.

Certain boards have already decided they will not allow students to opt out of classes that focus on inclusion and anti-discrimination.

Parental rights be damned

The PDSB won't grant accommodation requests for class work about inclusion and any of the 11 grounds that are protected from discrimination by the Canadian Human Rights Act.

"We cannot — we will not — by action or inaction endorse discrimination," wrote Tony Pontes, the district's director of education, in a letter sent home to parents on the first day of school.

The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) won't entertain any requests to have student miss classes about sexual orientation, gender identity or similar topics, said the district's spokesman Ryan Bird.

Quebec's no-exemption policy

Ontario is not the only province changing its approach to sex education. This academic year, Quebec started a pilot project under which roughly 8,200 students in about 15 schools will have mandatory sex-ed — but it won't allow exemptions. 

The course material will help students value gender equality and respect differences, as well as prevent relationship violence and unwanted pregnancies, wrote Pascal Ouellet, the Quebec Ministry of Education's media relations manager, in an email.

"In this context, we have no provisions for any exemptions," Ouellet wrote.

The project is scheduled to last two years and could be extended to all schools in the province in 2017-18.

Currently, the Ontario Ministry of Education is not considering a similar move, said spokesman Wheeler.

Few penalties for absences

Even if schools implement a no-exemption rule or refuse exemptions for subject matter protected by the human rights code, parents can still choose to keep kids home. The consequences of missing a class without an official accommodation are vague or non-existent.

People who support Ontario's new sex education curriculum have held
demonstrations of their own, including this February rally at
Queen's Park in Toronto. (Darren Calabrese/Canadian Press)
Well that's certainly overwhelming support - 3 people. Do they seriously deserve a photo, or even being mentioned? Of course they do - this is a CBC report!

"It is a handful of classes," wrote PDSB's Woodland when asked if parents or students would face any consequences. "Not an issue."

Threats used to teach anti-discrimination

The TDSB seems to take a tougher, if more vague, stance. Students would be responsible for making up any missed work, says spokesman Bird.

He did not elaborate on how that would be possible if the work itself is part of what the student's parents don't want their child exposed to.

The HDSB's site explains that it may be difficult for students to "achieve a mark they are happy with" if they miss classes. District superintendant Dyson said, "students are expected to attend class."

Combating misinformation

A few days into the new school year, the general hope seems to be that Ontario schools will be able to win over most parents who currently oppose the new curriculum by clearing up misconceptions.

The PDSB has created numerous documents debunking some widespread myths, for example, such as rumours that Grade 1 students will be exposed to graphic flash cards and children will be encouraged to engage in sexual or homosexual activity.

The district's elementary schools won't teach the health sexuality components until spring "to provide time for parents to build an understanding of the curriculum," according to a letter sent home to parents.

The TDSB is also encouraging parents to seek out factual information from the Ontario Ministry of Education's website before making any decisions about keeping their children out of school.

The HDSB has also made documents and information sessions, including a recorded webcast, widely available to soften parental concerns, which Dyson says are usually about the prompts and examples in the curriculum and not the subject matter.

But she acknowledges that won't always work.

"At the end of the day, the parent will have to make a choice." Indeed, the parent may have to make a rather draconian choice or surrender their right to raise their child to the state.

Saturday, 29 August 2015

US Psychiatrist Tells Ontario Parents “Stand Firm” Against Dangerous Sex-ed

Ontario set to launch controversial sex-ed program in all schools

TORONTO, Ontario, August 26, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – American psychiatrist Dr Miriam Grossman pulled no punches when describing how the Ontario Liberal government’s controversial sex-ed curriculum is not science – as the government claims – but is instead an ideology intent on indoctrinating kids with a dangerous sexual agenda.

The upwards of 1,000 opponents to the sex-ed curriculum – which the Liberal government will roll into all publicly funded schools in about two weeks – responded to Grossman’s fact-packed, hour-long presentation with frequent outbursts of sustained applause, and a standing ovation at the end.

Grossman’s presentation, in which she made good on her promise to give parents “ammunition in your battle,” is hugely significant, noted Canadian Families Alliance (CFA) representatives, and equally significant are the two LifeSiteNews videos of the seminar. CFA and CFA affiliate HOWA (the main organizer of the event) hope the videos will be used as a major resource for concerned parents and others.

“The priority” of the Ontario curriculum “is not your child’s health,” the New York-based psychiatrist, sex-ed critic, writer and international speaker told her standing-room-only audience August 18.

Watch 1-hour video here
“The priority is to mould your child’s thinking and attitudes so that they respect and affirm and are comfortable with all sexual choices and lifestyles.”

Furthermore, there is no attempt in this curriculum to teach children how to recognize and deal with child sex abuse - a far, far, far bigger problem than discrimination against gays and lesbians.

Grossman commended the parents for their “phenomenal grassroots campaign” that sprang up after openly lesbian Premier Kathleen Wynne’s Liberal government introduced the radical sex-ed curriculum last February.

Within three months, outraged and concerned parents had formed the Canadian Families Alliance (CFA), a coalition of more than 25 parents’ rights organizations, associations and social media groups representing over 200,000 parents from a broad range of ethnic, faith and cultural backgrounds.

And their “amazing” mobilization – which included protests at the Ontario Legislature building at Queens Park, Facebook assemblies, large-scale use of Internet messaging to rapidly mobilize supporters when needed, car rallies, petitions and a “strike” in May where 35,000 (Grossman mentioned 20,000, but the actual number was greater) children were kept home from school – convinced Grossman to come to Toronto despite a hectic schedule. “I’ve never seen anything like this,” she marveled.

As part of this grassroots campaign, Jotvinder Sodhi’s Mississauga-based HOWA Voice for Change, a member of CFA, sponsored and organized Grossman’s seminar with the support of CFA affiliated organizations and leaders.

Sodhi said that Premier Kathleen Wynne has “labeled” the parents opposed to the sex-ed curriculum as “homophobes,” and “some of the so-called experts” have dismissed them as “illiterates.”

Moreover, the Liberals “wasted” $1.8 million to “advertise the government agenda,” Sodhi told LifeSiteNews, leaving parents having to “educate fellow parents” about what’s really going on in the controversial curriculum.

That’s why HOWA sought out sex-ed expert Grossman to speak at this event: “We wanted someone who knows the subject and who can speak the facts without fear – without fear, that’s very important.”

Commenting on the videos, Jack Fonseca, project manager for Campaign Life Coalition, stated that they “will completely debunk the myths and lies about the Liberal sex education curriculum that have been put out by Premier Wynne and her allies in the media”.

Watch 12 Minute video here
“With unassailable logic, and simple, down-to-earth language, Dr. Grossman has proven without a shadow of a doubt, that the Ontario sex-ed curriculum is not about protecting the health and safety of children, but rather, pushing an agenda of sexual revolution which make children more unhealthy and more unsafe.”

“In this dynamite lecture Grossman has set fire to the Liberal house of cards which claims that the updated curriculum is necessary to help students ‘develop healthy relationships’,” he added. “To the contrary, you will learn why this curriculum will lead children to developing very unhealthy relationships, not to mention a lot more sexually transmitted diseases.”

Lou Iacobelli, retired teacher, author of the Everyday For Life Canada blog and a leader in CFA, says the same, lauding Grossman’s presentation as “an incredible resource” that backs up, using documentation from the sex-ed curriculum, “what parents have been saying all along, that this curriculum is age-inappropriate and puts children at risk.”

He pointed out that Grossman has the credibility to make these claims because, as she told the crowd, she has seen for herself the consequences of such sex-ed agendas.

Indeed, Grossman’s campaign started when, as a physician at a clinic at UCLA for 12 years, she saw “thousands and thousands” of students, many of them women, who were suffering because of their “sexual choices.” That led to her research and two books: “Unprotected,” followed by: “You’re teaching my child WHAT?”

Grossman’s sex-ed critique is essential information not just for Ontario parents, but for parents everywhere, because the sex-ed agenda crosses all borders and is part of an aggressive worldwide push for “sexual rights” by International Planned Parenthood Federation and its allies, points out Matt Wojciechowski, CLC’s representative at the United Nations.

“What Wynne is bringing to Ontario is just scratching the surface of a larger global agenda,” he told LifeSiteNews. “Parents need to continue opposing her radical sex-ed curriculum for the well-being and safety of their children, but at the same time, they need to be made aware that this will not be the final assault.”

Wojciechowski explained that there is “a growing international ‘sexual rights’ movement that is very visible especially at the United Nations. It is championed by the International Planned Parenthood Federation and other like-minded organizations which are determined to expand their radical views to every corner of the planet.”

IPPF and its allies, Wojciechowski stressed, “are obsessed with exporting abortion on demand, redefining gender, altering the traditional family, and imposing sex-education programs on every culture, race and faith group.”

That’s why it’s imperative that parents protect their children.

Grossman urges them to “stand firm” even though “the creators and supporters of this curriculum see themselves as noble and compassionate” and that “you’re the problem,” and even though the mainstream media ignores them and that “the underlying message is that anyone who disagrees with this curriculum must be uneducated or a bigot.”

But Grossman’s critique was understood by her listeners to prove that these charges are false, and that the critique is an invaluable resource to convince skeptics who can’t or won’t see the dangers of the sex-ed agenda.

“Let’s set fire to the whole Liberal curriculum,” urged CLC’s Fonseca. “Share this powerful, evidence-based, science-backed lecture with teachers, school trustees, parents, politicians and everyone you know. It’s time for the Liberal lie to die.”

Or as Grossman told parents: “Your voices matter… Science is in your corner. Parents know what’s best for their children – not educator activists.”

See the LifeSiteNews feature page on the Ontario sex-ed curriculum containing nearly 100 LifeSite articles related to the issue.

Ontario readers may sign up for the September 2 province-wide protests at MPPs offices, go here. So far, there are protests planned at 90 of Ontario’s 107 constituencies. The parents’ movement seeking removal of the curriculum is urging all concerned citizens to join this special effort to influence individual Ontario legislators.