..
Very Disturbing new advertising trends in Europe and Asia
Personne Fantome
26 August 2020
Facebook, xlated by Google
·
The little girl in panties surrounded by birds is to promote the Venice exhibition in the photo we see write the title (he festival é donna) which means: ′′The festival is a woman"‼
Before car commercials it used to be with pretty sexy and limit women in their underwear, but today for an Audi commercial you don't put a little girl with a banana in her hands and title (lest your beat fan in every aspect) ) which means: ′′ Let your heart beat faster in every aspect ′′, and bikini ′′ mini-models ′′ are presented for Wuhan's car exhibition!! ️
Is the world in the hands of a pedophile clique?? Trying to normalize pedophilia?? But of course not, it's just coincidence!! ️
I'm not a Qanon follower but have been a conspiracy theorist for many years. I do believe there are godless people pulling the strings that move and shake the world. That they may be paedophiles is a possibility, but I'm not convinced! This, however, gives me cause for concern. What about you?
=====================================================================================
‘Beyond farce’: CNN states there’s ‘no consensus criteria’
to determine a child’s sex at birth
31 Mar, 2021 14:29
Doctors the world over can take a glance and know a newborn baby’s sex, but CNN doesn’t seem to believe the science. In an article discussing a ban on transgender women in women’s sport, the liberal news site went full woke.
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem issued two executive orders on Tuesday, banning young transgender women from competing in high school and college sports with biological women, declaring that “only girls should play girls’ sports.” Noem’s orders came after she declined to sign a bill on the issue for fear of litigation – a move that angered her conservative voters.
CNN took a dim view of Noem’s orders, calling them “transphobic.” In the same article, reporter Devan Cole stated matter-of-factly that “it’s not possible to know a person’s gender identity at birth, and there is no consensus criteria for assigning sex at birth.”
Come again? While gender identity is a thorny issue, and there is indeed no way of knowing what a child will grow up to identify as, assigning a baby’s sex at birth is not a complex process, and takes only a quick peek. While some super-woke activists want to change this and do away with the idea of labeling children male or female altogether, the overwhelming majority of medical professionals assign sex this way, except in the 0.018 percent of births that are intersex.
Commenters online ripped into CNN. “This is beyond farce,” conservative talk show host Jason Rantz tweeted. “This is CNN.”
“10 years ago, you would never have been allowed to write something so nuts at CNN,” another Twitter user chimed in, accusing the news network of denying “reality” itself.
CNN is far from the only news outlet embracing the rhetoric of the woke gender theorists, but it has embraced it with gusto. With Wednesday marking International Transgender Day of Visibility, the site published articles advising readers “how to be a good ally,” and which books to read to help defy “outdated rules of gender.”
On the other side of the aisle, Noem is not the only Republican to ban transgender athletes from female sports. The governors of Tennessee, Mississippi, and Arkansas all signed similar bills into law this month. Arkansas’ Republican-controlled legislature has also passed a bill that would forbid minors from receiving gender transition procedures.
CNN described these procedures as “life-saving medical care,” seemingly ignoring the research that most children “grow out” of their transgender identity, as well as some studies that indicate that those who transition have a higher likelihood of suicide afterwards.
These numbers are not trivial - 70-80% of gender-confused children normalize after puberty. What's really frightening is that 51% of girls who transition to boys will attempt suicide while still in their youth. I suspect that percentage will increase as 21st-century xgenders age.
Former Episcopal bishop punished for not allowing gay marriages in diocese leaves denomination
By Michael Gryboski, Christian Post Reporter
Wednesday, March 31, 2021
The Rt. Rev. William Love, IX Bishop of Albany, gives his address at the 152nd annual Diocesan Convention on Oct. 24, 2020. | YouTube/Episcopal Diocese of Albany
A bishop of The Episcopal Church who was punished for refusing to allow the blessing of same-sex marriages in his diocese has decided to leave the mainline Protestant denomination.
William H. Love, former bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Albany, was disciplined last year for refusing to enforce a church resolution mandating the blessing of gay marriages in every diocese, including those previously opposed to the practice.
In a statement released Wednesday, Love explained that he was leaving the Episcopal Church effective April 2 and planning to join the Anglican Church in North America, a more theologically conservative denomination.
That's a statement that may not be well supported with facts. The Anglican Church in N America and Europe has been struggling with these concepts for decades. It is only the African Anglican Church that is truly conservative.
“As a cradle Episcopalian (with nearly 30 years of ordained ministry as a deacon, priest and bishop), that was not an easy decision, but given all that has transpired these past couple of years and the constraints placed upon me as a theologically conservative and orthodox bishop within TEC, I believe it is the right decision,” wrote Love.
“It is my hope and plan to be received into the Anglican Church in North America in the very near future, at which time all the details of what I will be doing and where I will be serving will be shared in a separate announcement.”
Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Michael Curry, leader of the denomination, released a statement in response to the announcement, explaining that he had granted Love's request.
Without specifically mentioning the issue of same-sex marriage, Curry went on to argue that his belief was that “as a church we are called, as Jesus once said, to be ‘a house of prayer for all people,’ where, as my slave ancestors used to sing, ‘there is plenty good room for all of God’s children.’”
Perhaps a re-defining of the term 'God's Children' is what is needed here.
“That conviction is not based on a social theory or capitulation to the ways of the culture. Rather, it is born of my belief that the outstretched arms of Jesus on the cross are the ultimate sign of the very love of God reaching out to embrace and welcome us all,” stated Curry.
“To believe that is to commit to God’s work of creating what some have called the beloved community. It is to pray not only with our lips but with our lives, as Jesus taught when he said, ‘thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.’”
In July 2018, the Episcopal Church General Convention passed Resolution B012, which mandated that all dioceses must bless same-sex unions — despite being in conflict with the biblical standard of marriage — even ones where leadership objects.
While the resolution allowed clergy to refuse to perform same-sex weddings, it also required bishops who oppose gay marriage rites to let another bishop provide pastoral support for the same-sex couple as well as clergy for the ceremony.
In addition to the Diocese of Albany, the resolution impacted the dioceses of Dallas, Texas, North Dakota, Springfield, Illinois, Tennessee, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Diocese of Florida, and the Diocese of Central Florida.
That November, Love released an open letter stating that he was not going to enforce the resolution in his diocese, stating that he believed Jesus Christ “is calling the Church to have the courage to speak His Truth in love about homosexual behavior – even though it isn't politically correct.”
“Sexual relations between two men or two women was never part of God's plan and is a distortion of His design in creation and as such is to be avoided,” stated Love in the 2018 letter.
“To engage in sexual intimacy outside of marriage between a man and women, is against God's will and therefore sinful and needs to be repented of, NOT encouraged or told it is ok.”
And certainly not blessed! Can people practicing what God calls 'an abomination' possibly be called 'His children'?
In January 2019, Presiding Bishop Curry officially restricted Love’s ministry and last October, a disciplinary panel concluded that Love had violated canon law by opposing the resolution.
The Title IV Hearing Panel, created to focus on issues of ecclesiastical discipline when a member of clergy is accused of misconduct, released a unanimous opinion at the time finding Love guilty.
“Love’s actions in issuing a Pastoral Direction to his clergy that they refrain from performing same-sex marriages violated the Discipline and Worship of the Church as Bishop Love promised in his ordinal vows. His actions, therefore, constitute a breach of Canon IV.3.2(a),” ruled the panel last October.
The panel added that Resolution B012 allowed for bishops and clergy who oppose same-sex marriage to be exempted from blessing such unions, as long as a replacement could be found.
“Importantly, an accommodation is offered to diocesan bishops who oppose same-sex marriage to invite another bishop into the diocese to provide pastoral support for same-sex couples who seek to be able to utilize the rites in their local congregation or worshipping community,” continued the panel.
So, a Bishop can call another Bishop and get him to commit the abomination in his church. Sounds very immature and godless.
US military’s new transgender policy will pay troops’ transition bills
31 Mar, 2021 17:36 / Updated 1 hour ago
FILE PHOTO: A US Army soldier participates in a training exercise at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, August 27, 2019 © Reuters / Bryan Woolston
After President Biden lifted Donald Trump’s ban on transgender people joining the military, the Pentagon is set to unveil its new transgender policy. The military will now reportedly handle the medical bills of trans personnel.
Biden overturned Trump’s ban in January, with a White House statement at the time saying that “gender identity should not be a bar to military service.” Trump announced a ban on new transgender recruits in 2017, citing “tremendous medical costs” and “disruption.” After two years of legal wrangling, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the ban in 2019, which, by that stage, had been watered down from a blanket ban to a requirement for troops to serve as their birth gender, and a prohibition on transitioning while in service.
However, two months after Biden lifted the restrictions, the Pentagon is due to publish its updated transgender policy later on Wednesday.
The new policy will allow transgender people to enlist and serve openly as their preferred gender, an AP report revealed. Citing anonymous Pentagon officials, the report stated that, under the new rules, transgender service personnel will be entitled to “medically necessary transition-related care.”
What level of “transition-related care” would be deemed medically necessary is still unclear. Fully transitioning can cost upwards of $100,000, while individual procedures can also come with shocking price tags. Breast surgery for male-to-female patients can cost $9,000, and genital surgery – a six-hour procedure – can cost more than $25,000. Doctors do not always recommend such drastic procedures, however, and hormone therapy typically costs a more modest $50 to $250 a month.
Transgender people had been barred from military service in the US since the 1960s, until Barack Obama lifted that restriction in 2016.
Estimates on the number of transgender people serving in the military vary greatly. Though some studies place the figure as high as 15,000, the findings of a 2016 study by the RAND Corporation global policy think tank are most commonly cited. It estimated that, at the time, between 1,320 and 6,630 transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals were on active duty, and between 830 and 4,160 on reserve duty.
Of course, those numbers will climb significantly if the military are going to pay all the costs of transitioning. I suspect they will need to limit the number of people transitioning at one time in order to keep the military functional.
No comments:
Post a Comment