..
Evil paedophile who raped a toddler to death
set to be released from jail in NSW
..
Because he didn't rape or murder any babies in prison
By JACKSON BARRON FOR DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA
PUBLISHED: 14 December 2020 | UPDATED: 19:33 EST
A man who brutally raped and murdered a baby is set to be released from jail because of parole legislation that takes into account the amount of time since an inmate's last offence.
Douglas Wade raped and beat a 20-month-old baby girl he was babysitting in Tumut in central New South Wales in 1988.
The 57-year-old was jailed for life for the heinous crime before his sentence was redetermined to 36 years in 2013.
Wade's new sentence has a 26-year non-parole period, and since he has spent 32 years behind bars, he will be released from jail on Tuesday.
Paedophile Douglas Wade (pictured right) is set to be released from Long Bay Jail on Tuesday
Wade's impending release has sparked outrage in the community and highlighted a strange legislation requirement by the New South Wales State Parole Authority that stipulates officers must consider how long it has been since an inmate committed a serious offence in their application for release.
'I mean duh. How many 20-month-old babies are there in Long Bay Jail?' victims' advocate Howard Brown told The Daily Telegraph.
'What kind of offences could he commit?'
Certainly, not the kind that got him put in there. I have never heard of such spectacular stupidity in all my life!
Wade's victim suffered internal bleeding and died from a haemorrhage after her duodenum, liver and colon were ruptured in the attack.
Mr Brown said the release was a failure of legislation that had left the victim's mother inconsolable. '(The mother) is at her wits' end. She's too fraught,' he said.
As part of his bail conditions Wade will not be allowed to go to Tumut, where the mother of his victim lives.
He still denies raping the infant.
Factors for and against Wade's bail were considered by the State Parole Authority, including the fact the offence was Wade's first adult incarceration.
He tore the girl apart! How many chances does he deserve to get to do that?
However, parole officers were concerned with the seriousness of his crime and the fact Wade had failed to acknowledge the offence.
'Nowhere is there any suggestion that the offender is likely to change,' the SPA said. 'The present state of affairs seems likely to remain until the offender is released, whether that happens on expiry of the sentence or at some earlier time.'
Wade will wear an electronic monitor to prevent him from making any incidental contact with the victim's family.
Wade raped and beat a 20-month-old baby girl (pictured) he was babysitting in Tumut in 1988
GMP confirm investigations will 'progress' into Oldham
child sex abuse allegations ahead of review publication
Greater Manchester Police have established an operation
to work alongside the independent review
Greater Manchester Police has confirmed it will ‘progress’ investigations into child sexual exploitation in Oldham ahead of the publication of an independent review.
In November last year Oldham council and the Oldham Safeguarding Partnership commissioned a review from the Mayor of Greater Manchester into allegations circulating online about abuse in the borough.
These chiefly concern ‘shisha bars, taxi companies and children’s homes’, according to the terms of reference for the investigation.
At a council meeting last month it was confirmed the review is examining evidence from as far back as 2006 and as recently as 2017.
Malcolm Newsam, a former commissioner for social care in Rotherham and Gary Ridgway, a former Detective Superintendent of Cambridgeshire Police, were appointed to head up the review team and they are now working to finalise their report.
They were the duo behind the blistering report into Operation Augusta, published at the beginning of the year, which looked at the handling of child sexual exploitation (CSE) by the police and social services in Manchester.
An email exchange between Liberal Democrat opposition group leader Councillor Howard Sykes and Assistant Chief Constable (ACC) Mabs Hussain, seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, states that a police operation has already been set up to look at the allegations in Oldham.
Coun Sykes had written to ACC Hussain asking for confirmation that if evidence of CSE was identified in the review that the force would ‘relentlessly investigate’ any allegations, either historical or contemporaneous.
ACC Hussain confirmed that GMP has established Operation Hexagon under the command of Assistant Chief Constable Nick Bailey as gold commander to work with the review into the historic allegations.
“The safeguarding of vulnerable victims was treated as a priority, and this involved ensuring that any criminality that was identified, past or present was investigated and where the evidence allowed these have been placed before the Crown Prosecution Service for consideration,” he wrote.
“The GMP investigations have not been limited by parameters and have increased throughout the duration of our enquiries. Clearly, we will need to wait for the publication of the report to fully understand any wider implications and will ensure the appropriate organisational response to matters disclosed is put in place.
“I hope you will be reassured through the Operation which has already been established by ACC Bailey that any matters which are disclosed as part of the independent review are being progressed by Greater Manchester Police prior to any formal publication.”
The assurance review will specifically consider allegations of historic abuse that have been made on social media involving shisha bars, taxi companies and children’s homes.
This will include the ‘nature and extent to which adults had inappropriate access to children and young people resident in children’s homes in Oldham putting them at risk of harm’.
It will also look at the extent to which historical actions and employment records have been ‘adequately investigated’ in the case of ‘known offenders’ previously employed within Oldham public services.
It is understood this relates to jailed Rochdale grooming leader Shabir Ahmed, who worked at Oldham council until the mid-2000s.
The framework of the review says ‘particular reference’ will be made to concerns that statutory agencies were ‘aware of this abuse, failed to respond appropriately to safeguard the children and subsequently covered up these failings’.
Once the review team’s report is completed it will be published by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority.
Following publication of this story, GMP released a further statement.
ACC Nick Bailey said: "Following reports of correspondence between Councillor Howard Sykes and ACC Hussain, I would like to make further comment, which may help to clarify certain points and prevent inaccurate speculation.
"In August 2019 Op Hexagon was established by Greater Manchester Police, as the policing response to work already on-going between Greater Manchester Police and Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council, and has acted as the joint Gold Group for both police and council activity. This related to allegations that had been made on social media, concerning a range of issues involving named individuals.
"Those initial allegations did involve concerns of child welfare and safeguarding, but also a number of other allegations of criminal activities. Due to this, GMP, therefore, broadened the scope of the investigation to include any and all allegations of criminality.
"As the Gold lead for the operation I have been keen to ensure that any and all allegations of criminal activity are investigated - primarily to ensure that potential victims immediately receive the appropriate support, but also recognising the wider public interest. I can say that Op Hexagon remains on-going, where the evidence threshold for identified criminal offences has been met they have been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service, to date this has not included any offences relating CSE or the safeguarding of any children.
"As part of Operation Hexagon we have been supportive of the independent inquiry requested by Oldham Council, managed by the Deputy Mayor."
St Petersburg cops investigating after transgender prostitutes beat up 'transphobic' man who refused to pay for services rendered
11 Dec, 2020 17:30
© vk.com / Ekaterina Noskova
A Saint Petersburg man who refused to pay two transgender prostitutes for intimate services received complained to cops after the sex workers beat him up. 'Maxim' says they robbed him, despite his own alleged refusal to cough up.
Some might call it Karma, as his transphobia and greed finished with a stolen phone and egg on his face.
According to local news website ‘Fontanka,’ on Friday morning a Saint Petersburg resident named Maxim called cops in the city’s Primorsky District, claiming that he had been beaten up and thrown out of his rented apartment, where the two prostitutes remained.
Reports also state that the assault even included pepper spray to the face.
As told by local media, citing law enforcement sources, the man was thrown onto the street after an intimate encounter finished with the two sex workers revealing that they were transgender. Maxim refused to pay.
Outraged by the man’s transphobia, the two women demanded they be paid for services rendered and beat him up.
Once on the street, the man borrowed a passerby’s mobile phone, informing the police that he had been kicked out of his apartment by two prostitutes. The two women were reportedly detained.
Devon theatre worker facing jail over child sex abuse admission
By Ted Davenport
Devon Live
A former theatre worker has been warned to expect a long jail sentence after he admitted filming himself as he abused a 14-year-old boy.
He moved to Devon after being convicted of taking and distributing images of teenage boys in Sussex in 2012 and volunteered to help with a theatre group without telling them about his past.
He has worked in theatre all his life as a stage manager, including on tours with internationally famous performers. By the time he moved to Devon, he was banned from any contact with children by a Sexual Offences Prevention Order which was made when he was jailed in 2012.
He was arrested this summer and police found evidence on his phone and other devices of him committing serious sexual offences with the 14-year-old boy. There were also messages to another man in which he discussed his abuse of the child and spoke about making an introduction.
Weeks admitted meeting a child following grooming between October 1 and October 20, 2018 and sexual activity on November 19, 2018 and dates between then and June 1, 2019.
Weeks had already pleaded guilty to making an indecent photograph of the same boy on November 7, 2018, taking an indecent photograph of him on November 19, 2018, and distributing an indecent photograph of him on June 15, 2019.
The photographs which he admitted taking and distributing were in category A, which is the most serious type of photograph.
Weeks also admitted causing or inciting the same child to engage in penetrative sexual activity between November 19, 2018 and June 1, 2019 and arranging or facilitating a child sex offence between June 13 and 19, 2019.
He also pleaded guilty to breaching a Sexual Offences Prevention Order which was made at Chichester Crown Court on May 9, 2012.
Judge Timothy Rose remanded him in custody and told him he considers him to be a dangerous offender. He warned him he faces a jail term of at least 10 years.
On Dec. 8th he was jailed for 15 years with a six year extended licence and certified as a dangerous offender by Judge Timothy Rose at Exeter Crown Court.
Paedophile who travelled to Hampshire to pay for child sex abuse is jailed
By Kieran Davey
Sunday, 6th December 2020, 12:53 pm
Matthew Millen, of Hall Park Avenue, Westcliff-on-sea in Essex, was snared by police after two weeks of online communication between March 1 and 14, 2019.
The 44-year-old was charged in June 2019, following the investigation by the South East Regional Crime Unit (Serocu).
In this case, there was never a real life victim and no children were in any danger.
Investigating officer, Detective Constable Colin Haynes of Serocu, said: ‘This was a particularly distressing case where Millen thought he was paying for the sexual services of a child that was only 11 years old.
‘During the trial, Millen said he was attempting to expose other people involved in sexual exploitation, this was seen as a fabrication by the jury and he has been found guilty of these offences himself.
“This shows the lengths of depravity that Millen would go to in an attempt to conduct child sex abuse.
“This was a successful pro-active operation led by South East Regional Crime Unit officers, who have worked tirelessly to ensure Millen would be brought to justice.
On Friday December 4, Millen was sentenced to three years in prison.
Child sex offender jailed for 25 years after 'harrowing' police investigation into historic crimes
An elderly sex offender has been locked up for 25 years after a "harrowing" police investigation uncovered his sick crimes.
Joseph Telford’s offending spanned three decades, taking place in the 1950s, 60s and 70s. His crimes came to light in 2017 when one of his victims reported what had happened to police.
An investigation was launched, which uncovered the scale of his offending and identified three further victims who Telford repeatedly abused over several years when they were children.
He assaulted one of them on no less than 60 occasions over a period of four years, while another suffered six years of abuse, which began when they were just eight.
Telford, who is now 76, was charged with 12 counts of indecent assault and six counts of rape.
He denied the charges, but was found guilty following a trial.
Jailing Telford, of Major Street, in Darlington, at Teesside Crown Court on Friday Judge Howard Crowson praised the police investigation.
In a victim impact statement read out in court, one of his victims said: “This man not only took away from me my childhood innocence, and the enjoyment of growing up without fear of further abuse, he also took away my dignity and belief in myself.
“He created fear and nightmares that have remained with me throughout my life. He made me feel dirty and, at the age I am, I still feel dirty.
“The reason it took me so long to report it was because I have been conditioned by him to believe that no one would ever believe me.
“I know that at the age I am now, this may sound silly or unbelievable to someone who has not been the victim of prolonged sexual abuse, but it is as a direct consequence of the years of horrendous and painful sexual abuse that he exerted control over me and put me in unbelievably immense fear of him. He conditioned me to believe that I was so worthless, no one would ever believe me.
“I would like to express my thanks to the court and in particular, I would like to express my thanks and gratitude to Heidi Weir for her support and excellent investigation, and the bringing to justice of this evil man.”
Investigative Officer Heidi Weir, from Darlington Safeguarding Team, led the investigation. She said: “This has been a harrowing investigation, which has had the most haunting and devastating impact on the victims.
“Two of the victims have had their childhood taken away from them and have suffered a lifelong battle to survive. I hope now that they find the strength to survive, knowing that justice has finally been served and this serial predator will serve the rest of his life in prison.
Bermuda child sex offender fails in bid to quash damages judgment
Owain Johnston-Barnes, Royal Gazette
Created: Dec 11, 2020 08:00 AM
A convicted child sex offender has lost an attempt to overturn a civil court ruling against him for the damage done to his victims.
Jonathan Cumberbatch, 58, argued he was not responsible for the lasting psychological harm suffered by his victims and their mother.
Mr Justice Hargun wrote: “There is no reason to doubt that each minor plaintiff received extensive psychological treatment with psychotropic medications and counselling. In the circumstances, it is difficult to sustain the argument that the actions of the defendant complained of did not ’materially contribute’ to the harm suffered by the plaintiffs.”
Cumberbatch was sentenced to 12 years behind bars in 2010 after he admitted one count of sexual assault and three counts of the sexual exploitation of a young person while in a position of trust.
All of the offences took place in his home in 2008 and all three victims were under the age of 14 at the time.
The victims and their mother, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, filed a civil action against Cumberbatch in 2014. The family told the Supreme Court that they had suffered injury, loss and damage and the three children needed extensive psychological treatment.
Cumberbatch, who was released in 2018, was still behind bars at Westgate when the civil suit was filed. He received a writ of summons, but did not attend the Supreme Court hearing.
Then-Chief Justice Ian Kawaley granted a judgment in the victim’s favour, without Cumberbatch’s presence, with damages to be assessed. The Supreme Court heard Cumberbatch did not know about the default judgment against him and that he believed the case would not go ahead without his presence in court.
He was told of the judgment when he was released, and launched an appeal to overturn it. Cumberbatch claimed the decision should be quashed because his actions “did not cause or materially contribute to the damage which the plaintiffs have claimed they suffered”.
Mr Justice Hargun said: “The primary argument advanced by the defendant is that whatever psychological damage the plaintiffs complain of in the statement of claim, it was not caused by the defendant’s actions and behaviour.
“Counsel for the defendant submits that the minor plaintiffs were already so damaged that the defendant’s actions did not materially contribute to the damage set out in the statement of claim.”
Elizabeth Christopher, who represented Cumberbatch at the hearing, highlighted psychological reports that said the victims had suffered other abuse which did not involve Cumberbatch. But they said in affidavits that they continued to suffer “emotional and psychological stress” because of the sexual abuse by Cumberbatch.
Mr Hargun said it was not uncommon for the victims of abuse to have underlying vulnerabilities and that there may be other contributory factors. But he added it was reasonably clear that the abuse caused a “complete fracture of the family unit” and the children were sent to specialist centres.
Mr Hargun said: “It seems to me that the defendant’s reliance upon any pre-existing vulnerability of the minor plaintiffs to the harm complained of and the other facts relied upon are relevant, if at all, to the issue of apportionment of damages. Without expressing a concluded view, it may well be open to the defendant to raise those issues in the context of determination of damages.”
Mr Hargun added that to set aside the default judgment against him, Cumberbatch had to prove he had a realistic chance of success, but had failed to do so.
He said: “The burden is ordinarily discharged by the defendant filing credible affidavit evidence demonstrating a real likelihood that he will succeed in his defence. In all the circumstances, I have come to the view that the defendant has not discharged the burden of proof of establishing that he has a realistic prospect of success on the issue of liability.“
Astonishing conclusion by research into gang-related grooming
and child rape in UK
UK government report: ‘Research has found group-based child sexual exploitation
offenders are most commonly white’
DEC 15, 2020 1:00 PM
BY ROBERT SPENCER, Jihad Watch
The whole inquiry was wrongly focused, as it should not have been an investigation of the question of whether one particular ethnicity was solely involved, but whether the rape gangs were and are motivated by Islamic doctrine.
There is good reason to think so: a survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK has previously said that her rapists would quote Quran to her, and believed their actions justified by Islam. Thus it came as no surprise when Muslim migrants in France raped a girl and videoed the rape while praising Allah and invoking the Qur’an. In India, a Muslim gave a Qur’an and a prayer rug to the woman he was holding captive and repeatedly raping. And the victim of an Islamic State jihadi rapist recalled: “He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God…He said that raping me is his prayer to God.” In India, a Muslim kidnapped and raped a 14-year-old Hindu girl, and forced her to read the Qur’an and Islamic prayers.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
In light of that, there needs to be a further inquiry into what percentage of the British, American, Bangladeshi, Bulgarian, Dutch, Eritrean, Indian, Jamaican, Lithuanian, Pakistani, Portuguese and Somali members of rape gangs were Muslims. But there won’t be. That would be “Islamophobic.”
“Grooming gangs come from ‘diverse backgrounds’, says Home Office as review finally published,” by Lizzie Dearden, Independent, December 15, 2020:
Grooming gangs come from “diverse backgrounds”, a Home Office review has concluded.
The research, originally promised by Sajid Javid in 2018, was published on Tuesday following a government U-turn.
I wonder what Javid's response to this whitewashed wall is? Is that why he was moved from Home Secretary, so they could derail the inquiry and continue to pretend that there is no problem with Pakistani, Muslim men and little, white British girls.
The Home Office previously said releasing the paper would not be in the “public interest”, in response to a Freedom of Information request by The Independent, but committed to making it public after a petition signed by more than 130,000 people.
The paper said that although a number of high-profile grooming cases, including Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford mainly involved men of Pakistani ethnicity, “links between ethnicity and this form of offending” could not be proven.
That's astonishing! There are several more cities than those three mentioned where Pakistani gangs groomed young, white girls - never black, brown, or yellow girls, just white. The inquiry, apparently, didn't notice that. The inquiry seems happy to leave little, white, British girls at the mercy of the ever-forgiving and merciful Allah and his followers.
I hope that whoever derailed this inquiry, and whoever wrote this report, realizes that when they stand before Jesus Christ that there will be blood dripping from their hands, and it won't be theirs.
“Research has found that group-based child sexual exploitation (CSE) offenders are most commonly white,” it added.
They had to have included historical CSE as a result of Catholic and Anglican paedophile priests, etc. In the eight years I have been doing this blog, I think there was one group of white thugs that made this blog for CSE in the UK. How many dozens of stories are there about Pakistani Muslims and CSE? Far too many.
“Some studies suggest an over-representation of black and Asian offenders relative to the demographics of national populations. However, it is not possible to conclude that this is representative of all group-based CSE offending.”…
The nationalities and ethnicities of suspects in current investigations “varied considerably”, the report said, including British, American, Bangladeshi, Bulgarian, Dutch, Eritrean, Indian, Jamaican, Lithuanian, Pakistani, Portuguese and Somali.
This is pure BS! British governments at all levels are still sacrificing young, Brit girls on the altar of political correctness, just as the police and council at Rotherham did for decades, as 1500 victims were abused as police and council looked the other way.
Israel backs extradition of Malka Leifer after 6 years of stalling
The Canadian Press -
Dec 15, 2020 / 10:50 am |
Israel’s Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected an appeal challenging the extradition of a former teacher wanted in Australia on charges of child sex abuse, clearing the way for her to stand trial after a six-year legal saga.
Malka Leifer, a former educator accused of sexually abusing several former students at a Jewish school in Melbourne, has been fighting extradition from Israel since 2014. Leifer maintains her innocence and the six-year legal battle surrounding her extradition has strained relations between Israel and Australia.
The Supreme Court justices said that the ruling finalizes “the decision of the appellant as extraditable” to stand trial in Australia.
The Justice Ministry said in a statement that the ruling “brings us one significant step closer to Malka Leifer’s extradition to Australia” and that the ministry “will continue to make every effort to expedite Malka Leifer’s extradition to Australia so that she may stand trial for the crimes she is accused of committing.”
Israeli Justice Minister Avi Nissenkorn praised the court’s decision and said he would be signing the extradition order immediately. “After long and tormenting years, the time has come to do justice with Leifer’s victims,” he wrote on Twitter.
Critics, including Leifer’s alleged victims, have accused Israeli authorities of dragging out the legal process for far too long.
In September, a Jerusalem court approved Leifer’s extradition to Australia after the country’s highest court had upheld a ruling that she was mentally fit to stand trial.
Earlier this year an Israeli psychiatric panel determined that Leifer lied about suffering a mental condition that allegedly made her unfit to stand trial. As a result of the findings, Israel’s Justice Ministry said it would move to expedite her extradition to face 74 charges of child sex abuse.
Three sisters — Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper — have accused Leifer of abusing them while they were students at a Melbourne ultra-Orthodox school. There are said to be other victims.
“We have a very long journey ahead of us, a journey that truthfully should have begun nine years ago," Meyer said. “If I could give a message to all survivors, it’s reach out, find support, share your story and let’s get these abusers off the street.”
As accusations began surfacing in 2008, Israeli-born Leifer left the school and returned to Israel, where she has lived since.
Her attorney, Nick Kaufman, appeared to acknowledge his client has exhausted her legal options in fighting the extradition but expressed hope that, should she be convicted, she might be able to serve her prison sentence in Israel.
Pornhub removes a majority of its videos after investigation
reveals child abuse images/videos
Pornhub has removed a majority of its content — millions of explicit videos — uploaded from unverified users as part of a series of changes following allegations that the site showed videos of child abuse and nonconsensual sexual behavior.
In a blog post, Monday, the website said it had “enacted the most comprehensive safeguards in user-generated platform history,” including barring unverified uploaders from adding new content, eliminating the ability to download most videos and has removed all previously uploaded content that was not created by Pornhub’s verified content partners or members of its adult performer network.
The changes took the number of videos on the website from 13.5 million videos down to a little under 3 million. Going forward, content creators must become verified using Pornhub’s process that involves uploading a picture of themselves with their username.
The Canadian-based website jabbed other social media websites, writing that “every piece of Pornhub content is from verified uploaders, a requirement that platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat and Twitter have yet to institute.”
“In today’s world, all social media platforms share the responsibility to combat illegal material.,” Pornhub stated. “Solutions must be driven by real facts and real experts. We hope we have demonstrated our dedication to leading by example.”
I think you did, since you did absolutely nothing until you were forced to and threatened with further restrictions. Your 'dedication' is still to make money and that's all.
Pornhub was the target of a New York Times report earlier this month that led to large credit card companies to block customers from using their credit cards to make purchases on the website. Mastercard, Visa and Discover all terminated their cards from being used on it.
PayPal did so a long time ago, before they were forced to by publicity. Cudos to PayPal.
No comments:
Post a Comment